How do you deal with disrespectful people at your workplace?

 

There is a woman I work with. I have a normal relation with her, but she is a political fanatic and rabidly anti-Catholic. Every lunch time or coffe break she starts a tirade on party politics. She spends part of her working day reading partisan political blogs and then she spews it all out undigested at lunch time. For her politics is like sports, an excuse to root for her team and let off steam.

 

I try to make her understand she can’t see the philosophical forest for the trees of party politics and try myself to reconduct the debate from petty politics to a philosophical perspective, but she’s so fired up the message doesn’t get through.

 

I normally have the policy of not talking politics at work, so I could be the bigger man and politely ignore her, but I would be a bad Catholic if I kept quiet while I hear such profanities.

 

I could use a tu quoque and be offensive to things she holds dear (God knows I’m good at that), but that would be childish.

 

I could avoid her altogether, but it’s not worth it cutting social ties with my co-workers.

 

I could tell her to stop it, but it would only add unnecessary tension and melodrama.

 

How do you deal with people like that?

 

Views: 194

Replies to This Discussion

Sometimes you have to set boundaries.

She sounds closed minded, so any logical argument you make will be dismissed. I suggest you tell her to cut the crap, at least with the anti-Catholic rhetoric. Admonish her in private though; no one likes to be chewed out in front of other people. Be firm as well. I wouldn't bother addressing her political views unless they're intertwined with her anti-Catholic thoughts. If she doesn't cut it out report her to your boss or HR.

Normally I would say just ignore it all together. It's like feeding a troll on the internet- they go away if you ignore them. But in this situation its scandal because other people are only hearing one side and their thoughts could be turned. Sometimes you have to take a stand, and I'd say this is one of those times.

This looks like good advice:

http://management.fortune.cnn.com/2012/04/06/workplace-political-talk/

I don't think you have to counter every rant. When a heretic appears in Christian Men, I try to counter only to display the heresy, I'm not really arguing, I'm trying to put forth other ideas for those reading. I'll let a great falsehood be the last word if the person has already shown he's unreasonable, etc. [or this is what I'm trying to learn to do] Same with work. I will quietly say, "I feel differently" or "Actually, _I_ believe or do that "crazy" thing." The point is to let others know that intelligent, sincere religious people exist, indeed, work at this office, not to directly convince my co-workers of anything.

I had a relative on Facebook who was ranting -- at me, not generally -- about how I obviously did not care one iota about anybody who was a woman or a child, because I didn't think Planned Parenthood needed federal funding.  Yeah, go figure.  My response was,

I'm surprised to hear that from you.  Surely you know me better than that.

She:  It's fine for me to give my opinions.  I don't try to stop anybody else, either.  

Me:  Maybe it would be better to give those views without saying hurtful things about those who love you.

She deleted the thread.

So, I'd say:  handled.

You don't have a family relationship, but I think a similar approach could work.  Keeping in mind that it is a work situation, and if someone says something that will be reported to the boss as a civil rights issue, it should be her.

Thanks a lot for your replies.

 

I work in a big company. I don’t know if there is a corporate policy on political/religious talk, but reporting her for something that’s outside the realm of work is a line a strongly refuse to cross.

 

It’s not my feelings I care about – I'm thick skinned. It’s the fact that her poisonous propaganda should be left unchallenged. To refute her means getting involved in a debate, and that's a big effort on my part, such is the unsophisticated nature of her thinking, and frankly the last thing I want to do in my breaks is exhausting myself in heated debates.

First thought.

Every time you have to listen to the rant, do the Trappist thing.  Think or mutter, "This for Jesus."

Second thought.

Google "Workplace Harrassment".  Go to the EEOC page.  If the ranter knows you're Catholic and does repeated hostile anti-Catholic rants in your presence, that could literally make her behavior a federal offense. (Creating a hostile work environment.)  Could also be that the boss doesn't know about the religious rants.  (Don't bring up accusation about the web-surfing!)  Document your meeting.  If the boss knows about the lunch room rants, and they continues, that makes any formal complaint you may a more serious matter.

 

 

 

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion 3,100 People a Week-- Will Our Next President Change This? in the group The Great Debate
"Roadsigns aren't in KPH for one."
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion 3,100 People a Week-- Will Our Next President Change This? in the group The Great Debate
"Why wouldn't bad people want to come here as well as good? Also, what is it about living pretty far north? Administration's been busing/flying them all over."
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion After Chattanooga in the group The Great Debate
"He said it needed doing immediately, so it was released around 5:30 am and passed 10 in the House, in violation of his promise (which he couldn't implement, but still) that on his watch legislation would be available on Internet for days so…"
1 hour ago
manInTheMaking replied to Pale Horse's discussion 3,100 People a Week-- Will Our Next President Change This? in the group The Great Debate
"I dunno, I live pretty far north so this issue is really not that big a deal to me.  I'm more concerned that a blowhard like Trump is gaining any traction in a presidential race.  I guess I'd be far more concerned about the bad…"
1 hour ago
Joshua replied to Josh T's discussion devotional in the group Christian Men
1 hour ago
Liam Strain replied to Pale Horse's discussion After Chattanooga in the group The Great Debate
"Four days passed between the Senate finally signing off on the 2009 Stimulus, and it getting signed by Obama.  He didn't have the authority to allow foreign ships operating permission on his own.  Not making excuses, the man has his…"
1 hour ago
Bob Saget replied to Pale Horse's discussion Backsliding in the group Christian Men
"I'd say the answer lies in the parable of the Sower (Mark 4:3-8). Note how some sprang up (got saved) but withered away ("backslid") later on, and Jesus purposefully sets those seeds apart from the seeds which increased thirtyfold,…"
1 hour ago
ClubmanPinaud replied to Sir's discussion Is it manly to own a cat?
"Stewardship and the healthy raising of any animal can be manly and a good hobby of sorts in my opinion. It's just a matter of the approach. A general compassion and appreciation for all creatures is a value my father taught me. I think having a…"
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service