I'm really glad that the recent Bond movies seem to be going back to basics and are moving away from the campy stuff of previous Bond incarnations. 

Bond is still high tech, but it's his wits and skills that get him out of most situations, and that's great. 

But I have to admit, I miss the gadgets and the scenes in Q branch that show them testing weapons and gadgets that are borderline absurd.  And I miss Bond being issued a gadget that is meant for one purpose, only to have him find a completely different use for it. 

Anyone with me on this or am I just grasping on to something from the Bond movies of my youth that really needed to go away? 

Views: 32

Replies to This Discussion

I like the gadgets but it got to be a bit much for me in the Brosnan era.  Too much of a focus on the gadgets and too out there (invisible car).  I wouldn't mind seeing a few in the next movie though as long as it was done well and served a limited purpose.

RSS

Latest Activity

Regular Joe replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"Handout implies charity. I wouldn't call making an auto or home insurance claim a request for charity, so I don't see why I'd call making a claim on employment insurance a request for a handout."
6 minutes ago
John Muir replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"I think he IS talking about people who paid their taxes, because he said "Taking short-term handouts ('benefits' is such a bullshit term) isn't entitlement. " What's short-term if it's not someone who…"
6 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"There is.  Currently, and since Clinton, it has been 3 years but it is easy to get back on it after a short period of time.  There have been programs for job training for welfare recipients and child-care provided during training.…"
7 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"I'd deserve to be beaten bloody for calling it a 'handout'.  Good grief.  Union gun thugs still running things in your neck of the woods?  I've taken unemployment before.  It's a handout. …"
14 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Stephen Jashub Comstock's discussion Pajama recommendations.
"It's nice for what it is but I doubt I'd ever get one; they just fancy bath robes. "
20 minutes ago
John Muir replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"Handouts is the bullshit term. If you pay taxes and pay into an unemployment insurance system, and your employer does as well, you're receiving a "Benefit" of that insurance.  You'd get your ass kicked around here if you…"
21 minutes ago
John Muir replied to John Muir's discussion The End of Quantitative Easing As We Know It in the group The Great Debate
"Nah. The shutdown in the fall of 95 was like 21 days, there weren't any shutdowns before 1976, and only a handful between 1976 and 1995 - all for just a few days. I stand by the shut-down during the Clinton Administration being the first major…"
25 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"Taking short-term handouts ('benefits' is such a bullshit term) isn't entitlement.  By 'entitled', I mean habitual welfare recipients, unemployment recipients, unnecessary disability recipients, etc. JB"
27 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service