I was writing a thank you note last night and when I was finished with the note, I was extremely satisfied with the end product and the experience of writing it.  Although I don't do it as much as I should, I have always enjoyed writing notes to friends and family.

 

I try to integrate some nice touches into writing and personalizing my notes, and I always like to finish it off by using sealing wax on the envelope with a stamp that has my initials on it. 

 

Then, the thought occurred to me as to whether anyone else chooses to do this.  I know that in the day and age of self sealing envelopes a wax seal has little value, but I think that it adds a level of sophistication that makes receiving the letter even more special.  

 

So, what are your thoughts on wax sealing?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Views: 790

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Well, I was against it, but now I'm nearly converted.
If you are in fact converted to seals and sealing-wax, it may be helpful to know that you may carve your own seals from soapstone- it is quite easy to do, and is also rewarding.
Interesting. I have 14 soapstone pawns on which to practice.
The base of a soapstone chess pawn would make an ideal seal, sir- and such a carving would not interfere with its continued use as a pawn...
Does anyone have any recommendations of good places to purchase quality seals? I've done google searches and come up with several options, but some of which I don't really like the fonts they offer, and about none of which do I know their reputations for quality. Any ideas here?
This site www.ghh.com/glf has some interesting ideas for ways to fold letters in different ways.

I was advised by one who knows more about this than I that Atelier Gargoyle wax holds up well in the mail.
I've never used a wax seal for a letter, but I like the idea.
And here I was just going to start a post!  I'm thinking about getting into it.  Manly because it's old fashioned.

RSS

Latest Activity

Jack Bauer replied to David Johns's discussion Male insecurity?
"  It may not be entirely symmetric ... but its probably moreso than that makes it sound.  Pants are a unisex article of clothing.  Like t-shirts.  They make pants specifically for girls.  Dresses aren't at all…"
8 minutes ago
Lex Goretoy replied to Morgan Land's discussion Firearms for the unfamiliar
"YouTube University. You can find a lot of videos explaining safety, shooting technique, and how to properly clean a firearm after use."
8 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Jack Brenner's discussion Interim Bill
"Damn you can't even understand simple English.  I gave examples of why someone would do this, I didn't judge them based on some damn ass-upmtion I made about their situation, you all did.  If you can't tell the difference…"
24 minutes ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to Jack Brenner's discussion Interim Bill
"You've been speculating. You've been making all manner of assumptions. You've been making excuses for why someone would do this. Then you deride others for speculating and making assumptions. Can't have it both ways."
38 minutes ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to Jack Brenner's discussion Interim Bill
"This."
42 minutes ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to Jack Brenner's discussion Interim Bill
"<insert dragging this out further self-identification text here>"
43 minutes ago
Will replied to David Johns's discussion Male insecurity?
"It's not symmetric. A boy wearing a dress is a freak, but a girl wearing pants is, well, a girl. Same for makeup. Same for a backpack with Hot Pink Princess Barbie v. Transformers.  Although the girl might get a raised eyebrow on that…"
46 minutes ago
Richard G. Krueger updated their profile
53 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service