Wood, Pellets, or Pucks? Let's put a discussion on the fire.

Evening gentlemen,

Just curious as to which heating method you prefer. A decent-sized woodstove, a Pellet/Puck Stove, or a wood-fired Cookstove with the oven/heating compartment/water heater on the side.

 

Personally, I prefer a nice woodstove or a cookstove as you can toss a couple pieces of hardwood in them and shut them down for the night, as well as having a wood pile the size of all outdoors as opposed to having to stock up on pellets or pucks from the store. (not saying you can't buy firewood, but if you can get your hands on a decent-sized tree, you'll have wood for 2 seasons depending on how much you burn.

 

What say you, men?

Views: 300

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I second a wood stove.  The way I look at it, you can pretty much throw anything in it to burn

I used to work in a shop that would cut up old tractor tires and burn them.  The stove would actually glow red.  Wouldnt get away with that today. 

Anyway, I live in a rural area with plenty of trees.  Wood stove is the way to go. 

Exactly! Old newspapers, paper plates and cups, boxes from stores....It's great being able to use whatever flammable items are on hand, instead of just one type of fuel.

 

Claude, you might, in a very rural area...Away from anyone who would smell the smoke and realize it is burning rubber.  I've never seen a stove get hot enough to glow red, but I know the big stove we have at the cottage can force you outside during a Canadian winter from the heat it puts out.

I like wood stoves for simplicity and atmosphere but they take up room and you need to live where you can get wood and store it correctly.   I enjoy the exercise - when I have time. 

I have a friend here who is pleased with his pellet stove. 

RSS

Latest Activity

Taz updated their profile
21 minutes ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"At least I'm acknowledging them instead of pointing to words on a printed page, provided without context, and demanding my interpretation be accepted without question, investigation, or independent thought. Who was Moses' father-in-law?"
23 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"Anyone who thinks that subtleties of verbal tone, which are by no means cut and dry, especially in an informal telephone recording makes the case a slam dunk for your interpretation - needs to reconsider how their own bias might be at play. "
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion Polarization, "violent rhetoric" in the group The Great Debate
"Another overreach and rejection of it (overreach by the dude, rejection by the Dem. Party): http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/23/caught-on-tape-dem-official-says-hes-glad-scalise-got-shot.html Some walked back, not sure if…"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"You forgot the emoji ":/". For someone so concerned with Trump's tone, you're sure ignoring it here. Anyone who thinks that was an endorsement deserves mocking, and nothing more."
2 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
""Yeah, I guess so - I wish the first time it was done better.""
2 hours ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"So you didn't listen to the interview. Got it."
2 hours ago
Jay D replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"Stop making shit up. The link above provides the sound piece. Also what is about all the other lies he told? Are you fine with your president being a liar or do you just pretend none of it is a lie?"
2 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service