Jon Quincy Adams once said,

“From all that I have read of history and government of human life and manners, I have drawn this conclusion, that the manners of women were the most infallible barometer to ascertain the degree of morality and virtue of a nation.”


To get the thread rolling or spinning I would say he is right to a very high degree. What say yous guys.

Views: 660

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Assumption to a very high degree and a subjective statement based on the viewpoint of an upper-class white male almost two and a half centuries ago.

It's the product of a certain place and time, and it's interesting as a statement on men's view of women at that particular time and place, and surely we can analyze the context for clues as to the origins of the idea that womenfolk are the keeper of morals.

But it's not an absolute and doesn't really tell us anything about today. Even in colonial times you could find plenty of examples of morally "bad" women. Men as well. To use it as a measure of national morality is pure tripe.

Adam's assertion doesn't require analyzing how a nation treats it's women.  Granted treating women appropriately ought be expected of any civilized nation just as treating any person appropriately is.

Adam's assertion requires analyzing how a nation's women treats others.

It's supposed to be enlightened and flattering towards women - look how important they are - but with 0 context, why does he choose that half (or quarter, if you separate children) of the nation? What's irrelevant about men's manners? Also, using manners to discern morality and virtue is suspect. Manners vary; morality and virtue are derived from self-evident truths.

Tocqueville has similar comments about American women, but there I know the context. He particularly remarks on women traveling alone. To him, this shows both how law-abiding the nation is (weaker citizens protected by general order and stronger citizens) and how egalitarian (women not constantly under a man's authority).

I don't think it is saying that males manners are irrelevant, but just that if manners or morals swung in one direction for the worse then there would be balance or an origin. 

That's why I think the word barometer is pretty useful because it's not to say that men alone can't sway the moral high ground. But if as a group all agreed on acting a certain way and there was no contrast, then anything they do would appear to be right. Also taking my own life as an example, my Dad swears like  sailor. My mom never liked it or always stopped me if I did it, and now I rarely swear.

I would disagree about manners.

Manners are a subset of ethics, therefore ultimately morals and virtues will come into play.

I disagree that ethics necessarily reflect morals. Virtues, maybe. But manners and ethics are social constructs, not moral ones. Morals *may* come into play, but are not necessarily part of the equation. 

Perhaps so, I included morals to cover my bases, there are areas between the two that get cloudy.

It could possibly be during the time he wrote it there may have been a tighter correlation between manners and morals, virtues. 

I'm not seeing it.  Also not sure what the practical outcome would be if I adopted that perspective.

And this is bad for what reason?

Also, scantily-dressed women are not original to the 20th century!

RSS

Latest Activity

Lucius Artorius Castus replied to Brandon's discussion Admiring aspects of times of oppression
"Alot of things decide sentence severity. One of those is previous record. I could be wrong but my understanding of most of the statistics only include severity of the single crime, not previous offenses."
11 minutes ago
Izzy joined Tyler Wainright's group
Thumbnail

Manly Dads

This group is for men out there who have children and are looking for a better way to balance manhood with fatherhood
12 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Brandon's discussion Admiring aspects of times of oppression
"and so there is a good argument to be made that the differences in sentences were motivated by racial animus, rather than a desire to punish trafficking in more dangerous substances more severely. My instincts would be that the differences in…"
12 minutes ago
Izzy joined JonEdanger's group
Thumbnail

Wet Shaving (No Spam!)

A group to discuss anything and everything concerning straight, SE or DE razor shaving.Spam will not be tolerated. Any member who spams the group will be uninvited.See More
21 minutes ago
Adam Parker joined Todd Serveto's group
Thumbnail

Growing in Manliness

Men who want to grow in masculinity, develop stronger manly traits, and be more confident in manhood.
21 minutes ago
Chuck Knight replied to Brandon's discussion Admiring aspects of times of oppression
"There is documented evidence that, for otherwise identical crimes, whites routinely receive a significantly lighter sentence than people of color.  So, yes, it does appear that a racial bias does exist.   Whether this is an institutional…"
22 minutes ago
Rebekah replied to Brandon's discussion Admiring aspects of times of oppression
"It's definitely the case that most people, and most blacks, in prison are there for non-violent crimes.  It's also definitely the case that different forms of cocaine are treated differently by the sentencing statutes.  It is my…"
26 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Brandon's discussion Admiring aspects of times of oppression
"Unless you think blacks are locked up for usually victimless, definitely non-violent, crimes, and that the sentencing provisions either explicitly or implicitly discriminate on the basis of race through meaningless distinctions regarding…"
37 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service