Jon Quincy Adams once said,

“From all that I have read of history and government of human life and manners, I have drawn this conclusion, that the manners of women were the most infallible barometer to ascertain the degree of morality and virtue of a nation.”


To get the thread rolling or spinning I would say he is right to a very high degree. What say yous guys.

Views: 690

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Assumption to a very high degree and a subjective statement based on the viewpoint of an upper-class white male almost two and a half centuries ago.

It's the product of a certain place and time, and it's interesting as a statement on men's view of women at that particular time and place, and surely we can analyze the context for clues as to the origins of the idea that womenfolk are the keeper of morals.

But it's not an absolute and doesn't really tell us anything about today. Even in colonial times you could find plenty of examples of morally "bad" women. Men as well. To use it as a measure of national morality is pure tripe.

Adam's assertion doesn't require analyzing how a nation treats it's women.  Granted treating women appropriately ought be expected of any civilized nation just as treating any person appropriately is.

Adam's assertion requires analyzing how a nation's women treats others.

It's supposed to be enlightened and flattering towards women - look how important they are - but with 0 context, why does he choose that half (or quarter, if you separate children) of the nation? What's irrelevant about men's manners? Also, using manners to discern morality and virtue is suspect. Manners vary; morality and virtue are derived from self-evident truths.

Tocqueville has similar comments about American women, but there I know the context. He particularly remarks on women traveling alone. To him, this shows both how law-abiding the nation is (weaker citizens protected by general order and stronger citizens) and how egalitarian (women not constantly under a man's authority).

I don't think it is saying that males manners are irrelevant, but just that if manners or morals swung in one direction for the worse then there would be balance or an origin. 

That's why I think the word barometer is pretty useful because it's not to say that men alone can't sway the moral high ground. But if as a group all agreed on acting a certain way and there was no contrast, then anything they do would appear to be right. Also taking my own life as an example, my Dad swears like  sailor. My mom never liked it or always stopped me if I did it, and now I rarely swear.

I would disagree about manners.

Manners are a subset of ethics, therefore ultimately morals and virtues will come into play.

I disagree that ethics necessarily reflect morals. Virtues, maybe. But manners and ethics are social constructs, not moral ones. Morals *may* come into play, but are not necessarily part of the equation. 

Perhaps so, I included morals to cover my bases, there are areas between the two that get cloudy.

It could possibly be during the time he wrote it there may have been a tighter correlation between manners and morals, virtues. 

I'm not seeing it.  Also not sure what the practical outcome would be if I adopted that perspective.

And this is bad for what reason?

Also, scantily-dressed women are not original to the 20th century!

RSS

Latest Activity

Jack Bauer replied to Joshua's discussion Any advice for selling a collection?
"If you don't care all that much about the money ... just pile up the stuff, take it to a comic book store, and sell it as a single lot.  If there's anything good in it, they'll probably buy it.  Won't give you top…"
2 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Joshua's discussion Any advice for selling a collection?
"From what time period do most of your pieces come from? IMO that's a big factor in determine whether or not they're worth anything and what you should do with them.  You could also do what I've done in the past: create one ad,…"
6 minutes ago
Will replied to whiskyjack's discussion Did anyone else get a "group email" from Gnostic Bishop? in the group Christian Men
"I'm not getting into this argument -- I think you're being hard on each other -- but it does remind me of what I have read about Islam. The version of theology established by al-Ghazali (though there were definitely precursors) is that to…"
20 minutes ago
Rusty Rogers replied to Tim Buck's discussion Who should you get a professional massage from: male or female?
"I've had both. I have noticed one difference: guys tend to have larger hands and use more muscles (rougher massage). Therefore, from my experience, the guys gave deeper massages but the ladies gave gentle/relaxing massages. Of course, if I give…"
21 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Belmin Bratic's discussion Martial Arts
"She.  And yes.  But most others don't. I do judo now so it's more likely that I'll come into work limping rather than with a black eye, but I still get funny looks from the people who don't know me. "
22 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Regular Joe's discussion Learn a new language for free!
"It would definitely be confusing. I started with Danish just for fun and worked exclusively on that for a month or two. Them when I found out I'd be taking another trip to Cuba, I gave Danish a break and started with Spanish. I already had a…"
23 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Tim Buck's discussion Who should you get a professional massage from: male or female?
"If you're going for legit massage therapy, there's no difference between a man or a woman except that most men could theoretically put more pressure. "
26 minutes ago
WVUGent updated their profile
32 minutes ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service