Pardon my lack of knowledge on the subject, but isn't freemasonry simply derived from stone masons who didn't work for any lord or whatever?

I don't see why a lot of people spread conspiracy theories and whatnot about them. The things they include in these conspiracy theories don't even seem human. It reminds me of how rumors spread about certain cliques in high school, just because people didn't know them.

I read the "Simple Wikipedia" entry on Freemasonry... it described that it's basically just a group who is committed to helping others. I don't see any reason why this correlates to meaning "group who is secretly running the world".

Maybe I'm missing something here and someone more knowledgeable on the subject can clue me in?

Views: 2547

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They started as stonemasons.  They're not anymore.

 

They have secrets, and have listed some powerful people among their members.  That's enough to set off Alex Jones and his ilk.  Same with Skull & Bones, etc.  When paranoid people don't know anything, they assume the worst.

 

JB

Because, they're part of a secret cabal running the world.  And generally doing a shitty job at it.  If they were running the world AND competent, they wouldn't receive so much rage.

How do you know it's not running exactly as we intend? 

Because it's running like a Swiss...car.

You mean a Yugoslavian car?

While the individuals don't wear masks the group as a whole does. Some just find that a little fishy.

They let Jews in, and the friend of your enemy is your enemy

The Pope had some not-nice things to say about them, so people following him won't like them

They don't let in women

Their architecture doesn't live up to their ideals

They're key to some hokey and/or racist novels that at least led to a movie with one of the nicer singing scenes in cinema

They didn't prevent the Red Revolution

Not everyone will be attracted to the way Masons do things - with a lot of structure and hierarchy; there are critiques of the Masons that parallel critiques of more public organizations like the House of Windsor and the Catholic Church

People in the Freemasonry AoM group may know more history.

I don't know anybody who hates Freemasons.  I do know of some that disapprove or disapproved.

Roman Catholic Church says Freemasonry incorporates some religious views incompatible with Catholic Christianity, and is bothered by strong oaths that might, so it says, contravene religious or civil obligations.

Some Protestants think Freemasonry has (secret from most of its membership) anti-Christian beliefs.

The Nazis didn't like anybody keeping secrets from the government.  I think Communists were the same.

Back around the 1830's there was a US political party called "Anti-Masonic."  But at that time that meant more or less "Anti-Drinking-Club."

Recommended reading:  Manhood and Ritual in Victorian America, mostly about Freemasons and similar fraternal organizations.  Won't tell you much about opposition to Freemasonry, but it will tell a good bit about Freemasonry itself.

Masonic lodges are dry.  Which is why the Shriners exist. Thirty fourth degree Masons like to have a nip while planning the subjection of humanity.

That's why I joined the KoC.

I don't think there are any dry lodges in Canada.

Yea, most all (but not all) lodges are dry (and that has not always been the case). 

 The anti-masonry party came about after the only known time that Freemasons killed one of our own, a guy named Morgan who was kicked out of the lodge for being naughty and he threatened to publish a tell all. Some of the local brothers got together, burned the publishing house down, had Morgan arrested for failing to repay a debt, made his bail, took him out into the woods and he was never seen again.  The local sheriff, the judge, the bailiff, magistrate, everyone involved was a Freemason. 

RSS

Latest Activity

UrbaNick6 joined Ben's group
30 minutes ago
UrbaNick6 replied to UrbaNick6's discussion Tiny House Living
"I know off hand that Noblesville, Indiana has a minimum 1 acre lot for R-1, which is suburban indeed. Even if the minimum is set at that 5-7,000 mark, how often do you think that occurs in an area that has little physical barriers to building…"
59 minutes ago
Nick H replied to Steve Dallas's discussion Am I a sexist? in the group The Great Debate
"Could be worse. They could have just got the women from sex and the city"
1 hour ago
Native Son replied to UrbaNick6's discussion Tiny House Living
"A half-acre urban residential lot?  Where?  Specifically where? Suburban lots have routinely been more like 5,000 to 7,000 sq. ft. for decades."
1 hour ago
Naveen replied to Naveen's discussion Information needed for proper Sandbaglifting technique
"I may overcomplicate again, but anyway.  A: I don`t even know the basics man. Like that the feeds have to be placed shoulderwith, the shoulders tucked in etc. So I my teach myself bad form,  and I don`t want to correct me all the time,…"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Cory Ross's discussion Promoting Facial Hair Growth
"Squats and prenatal vitamins."
1 hour ago
Native Son replied to Steve Dallas's discussion Am I a sexist? in the group The Great Debate
"I know this really, really belongs in the "Film" group, but this sounds like yet another movie I'll won't see until it hits cable "On Demand", and costs $3 instead of $60 for the family to see some evening."
1 hour ago
Cory Ross posted a discussion

Promoting Facial Hair Growth

As a man that is required to remain clean shaven, I often find myself envious of those manly mustaches and beards rocked by manly men. However, even when vacationing I fail to grow even as much as a respectable mustache.My question then is whether or not anything can be done to promote facial hair growth (I am 30 now, and hair seems to be showing up everywhere except there lol)Thank you, and have a great weekend!See More
2 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service