Why are boots the work footwear? What are some classic quality brands?

Hi, I work outside in the field. I wear boots because it's what I think of as work wear, but they aren't very comfortable after long hours and when I go hiking I wear sneakers, which got me to thinking why are boots the work foot wear? Are they supposed to be more comfortable then shoes if you buy a quality pair? Does anyone have suggestions for me?

I would like comfortable quality foot wear with these preferences:

above the ankle for support

good for long hours

quality brand (I would like to buy a great pair and get them resoled as needed rather than buy new ones)

can go from work to dinner

good for riding a motorcycle

and would really like an old classic brand from before the 70s that would be a good 2nd hand find (I like old things, I'm an archaeology student)

I have been thinking red wings, doc martens, timberlands, or alden's if I get lucky. Am I thinking in the right direction?

Views: 2300

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think you're looking in the right direction. I'd recommend Field and Stream Gore-tex boots. That is the boot I wear for hunting/working. They are comfortable and I can't say anything bad about them. I would also recommend a pair of combat boots, they are light weight and designed for extreme work. The combat boots I've tried on have been very comfortable as well.

I prefer Timberlands and Wolverines (both are American-made as supposed to another brand manufactured in a "Red" country...

as to the combat boots thing, I was a Soldier from '02 thru '05/'06, as much as I LOVED my Tanker Boots, I found that even the "desert boots" were hard on my feet.

So I discourage wearing combat boots in place of work boots.

Tim's and Wolverines are well-made and whenever I replace my footwear it's with either of these 2 brands.

To the original Poster:

As a sidenote both manufacturers as well as others. produce Hiking boots and "Athletic" footwear. Give those a shot?

Check again on your Wolverines, many are made elsewhere. I had to stop wearing them,quality had severely dropped

Actually these days combat boots are getting pretty decent; Vibram has made some gear that, although I was originally issued for work, I now where out and about. Probably not the most fashionable choice, but they are multifunctional. 

You know it bro, also the Bates 922s are super light weight and flexible, but not as protective I think

I prefer cowboy boots.  More comfortable than once they're broken in.  Ariat is good for cowboy boots.  All purpose ... work boots, dress boots.  I always preferred Sketchers for lace-up boots.

JB

Caterpillar's "Second Shift"

I've had a pair of these for a few years now.  They've been on my feet just about every day, all over the world; from Mexico, to the Rockies to Europe, to Afghanistan.  Learn how to polish them and you will be able to go from "work to dinner" in them as well.

Boots are work wear because they can protect you and take a beating, or at least good pairs will.  Sneakers are all soft rubber and cloth, with some plastic thrown in.  Comfortable, but not as sturdy.

Another brand to consider is Allen Edmonds.  They're quality, cheaper than Alden, and usually made in the US.  They mostly make dress shoes, but they have some good boots.

Are you talking laceup boots or pull on boots?

Lace ups. I think engineer boots look great, I tried a pair once but they made my feet feel like they were on fire after a few steps and I never went back.

I red that if you get stiched leather you can keep them your whole life and get them resoled, but finding classic brands has been a bit difficult, and I don't really have older men in my family I could ask.

Thanks everyone for responding.

They are there as a second barrier to moisture and grass seeds , if you are not comfortable in you masculinity you could always cut it to a straight edge rather the perforated edge .

I have, I guess, about 9 pairs of boots. Some for hiking, some for bad weather, some specifically for snow, some for dress, and a pair just for Cowboy Action Shooting. This is one of those boots shown in the photo below. This boot design is a replica of a common 1870's style used generally west of the Mississippi. I found that I didn't care for the mule ear pulls, so I had them shortened and sown into loops that tuck inside the upper. Boots this tall are worn with your pants tucked in, like riding boots or range boots.

RSS

Latest Activity

Northumbrian replied to James's discussion When can a kid pick his own damn hairstyle?!
"If I had a kid, I'd let them pick their own hairstyle, just as long as it isn't the mullet, the Afro, or a huge beehive hairstyle"
2 hours ago
Ricky replied to Stephen Larsen's discussion My Experience with PIT Training in the group New Warriors
"My Dear Brother, I just watched the video - like you I turned to Church Social Services, sound like the outcomes were different for us but keep in mind that I did it 1980 - yet I understand - how you felt on your mission - every…"
3 hours ago
Sir replied to James's discussion When can a kid pick his own damn hairstyle?!
"IDK how to resolve the disagreement in the marriage, but yes, I'd totally let the boy pick his hairstyle."
3 hours ago
Johann S. replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"Listen Hesse, You need to let go of all your expectations.  You should only being thinking about how to have fun on the date with the other person.  If you don't have fun, start looking for another person.  That is IT. I went on…"
3 hours ago
Native Son replied to James's discussion When can a kid pick his own damn hairstyle?!
"I was stuck with "Flat top, no grease" until I was a high school freshman.  "
4 hours ago
John Muir replied to James's discussion When can a kid pick his own damn hairstyle?!
"So long as my son is productive, and does what I tell him to (chores), I'd let him be as queer as he wants to be with his hair. "
4 hours ago
James posted a discussion

When can a kid pick his own damn hairstyle?!

     If there is one thing my wife and I disagree on, it's when our two boys(ages 7 and 4) can have some independence. Now, I'm not saying I let my 4-year old walk to the gas station around the block for his own cigarettes or some such nonsense, but when they're allowed to play in the yard or go next door or pick their own clothes without constant supervision.     My wife is the controlling one in this area, and I, according to her, am far too easy-going. Both those facts are due to how we were…See More
5 hours ago
Sir replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"Yes."
5 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service