There is a young boy that lives across the road from me that lives with his grandmother , I see his father on the odd occasion once or twice a year and I am pretty sure he has no imput in his life .
Of late there has been a police car visit the house at least twice a week , there have been car break ins a house that was recently sold and left vacant has had holes put in the plaster walls graffitied , the criminal activity is escalating . One of my neighbours is friends with a policeman from our local cop shop and as the boy is only 14 there is not much they can do so his advice was to beat the shit out of him but I don't think it is the most productive way to fix the situation .
Last night I was talking to another neighbour about a plan of action and we thought some kind of intervention , a big group of us front up tell him we will not tolerate the thefts and vandalism any longer he is to go back to school stick to the curfew the police placed on him , his accomplices are no longer welcome in the street , if he does not comply maybe then he would get a serious beating .
How should this situation be dealt with ? , is the threat of violence the only solution ? We always say that it takes a village to raise a child but how far do you go to put someone on the right path .

Views: 1494

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

At fourteen this kid is about to enter a stage of pre adulthood. The choices he makes will influence the person he becomes as a young adult. I'm guessing a group of people who he might not know that well threatening him might not be the best way. The only advice I can offer right now is that to get a person to agree to someone elses terms takes knowledge and understanding that people don't always exhibit.

I like the intervention idea. If you do it, speak with his grandmother first so she's not left in the dark. Even if she objects I would recommend going through with it anyway.

I don't think the threat of violence, even after the intervention, is the best course of action. Leave it in the hands of law enforcement. If he keeps doing what he's doing he'll have to learn the consequences that the law set out for him.

It sounds to me that he needs a strong, guiding force in his life, and his grandmother isn't (and can't) provide that. You and your neighbors can be his mentors and guide him back to the right side, in place of his father. Maybe that will set him straight. 

Out of curiosity, where are you from? 

D J I'm from Melbourne , Australia
My thoughts were to talk to the grandmother as well .

Who is this "we " that always says it takes a village? 

 Let me help you out;

  Put your hands on the kid, you go to jail. 

  hold an intervention and the kid just has something new to rebel against. 

 There is nothing you can do about it until he does something strong enough to have him incarcerated.

Somehow, I can only see that approach leading to even more strife. 

I does take a village, but as someone who works with teens, I know that confrontation won't work. If his grandmother is raising him, he probably harbors lots of resentment towards his parents, not to mention the grandparent who, in his mind, screwed up his parent. Someone needs to help him understand that people care about him, but do not approve of the choices he's making. Both grandma and the teen need some professional intervention, like a social worker or psychologist. Remember-- teens have underdeveloped brains. Support this family, don't threaten them. This approach might not succeed either, but it's worth a try.

 

It does not take a village. It takes two parents. 

 There is nothing functionally practical that can be done from outside of the family unit. 

 

 Unless of course the O.P. is considering adopting the boy. 

While that is the ideal, in this situation getting involved as a mentor/friend can have some impact. No guarantee, but a lot of kids without an ideal family have benefited from a family friend, relative, boy's and girl's club mentor, or other adult that was willing to stick around and be a role model.

It just can't be a one time thing. You have to be willing to get involved for the long term, even when the kid is being difficult or it seems to be going nowhere.

It just can't be a one time thing. You have to be willing to get involved for the long term, even when the kid is being difficult or it seems to be going nowhere.

Kinda what I was getting at. 

"We" , the people of my village .
The police were the ones that gave the advice to beat him senseless .

The kid probably deserves it.

But

think for a second, he's got no guidance from any blokes, his dad who's not around is clearly a dropkick who can't set an example (maybe he's already copped a ton of beatings in the home from his dad), and suddenly he gets the crap kicked out of him by all the other guys in the neighbourhood where he lives...what part of that scenario ends well for anyone?

No 14yr then dusts himself off and thinks they must be good guys and I better follow their good example. You'd think, screw those guys they just bashed me, it's war.

My younger brother went through the same thing when our dad left. It started with just a little bit of anger and getting in trouble in school but everyone just came down on him hard rather than working out what the problem was, it escelated. Schools, cops and other people in the area. He was singled out, targeted and as a young kid it gave him more to have to fight against and added to his anger and anxiety. It simply meant he was ready to fight.

He's never recovered from those years, the anger is just part of him now.

I don't know the answer, but bashing kids isn't it.

There'll be two different approaches depending on what the real question is that you're asking.

Do you and your neighbours want to help the young fella get back on track?

Are you just wanting to protect you stuff?

RSS

Latest Activity

Kit the Odd replied to Xenias Latin's discussion New Leadership Question
"I agree that this sounds more like a management issue than a leadership issue.  I don't really have any good suggestions for management training books. As for leadership, look up the US Army leadership manuals.  ADP 6-22 and ADRP…"
46 minutes ago
David R. added a discussion to the group Comedy!
Thumbnail

I know, I know...

I know, I know, I've got a dirty mind sometimes.  But here goes anyway.I passed by the sign in front of a local gym that was promoting how much weight their members had lost.  I saw "Congratulations, Bob Smith!  He lost 75 pounds and 19 inches!"How many men would like to lose "19 inches"?!  Comments?See More
2 hours ago
Jay D replied to J. Exalto's discussion Globalism in the group The Great Debate
"We are discussing two things here. 1. Globalism actually brought as huge relative wealth since the average western household now can afford things that were liited to the aristocracy just 100 years ago. Have you laundry done, babysitters, maids,…"
3 hours ago
Jay D replied to J. Exalto's discussion Globalism in the group The Great Debate
"I agree and being able to patent f.e. new drug recipes is very important for innovation, since there is a lot of money invested. But there are also many areas were patents kill innovation and competition, since they grant a quasi monopoly for…"
3 hours ago
Dal updated their profile
3 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to Nature of a Man's discussion A bizarre dating trend I see
"I wouldn't call it "bizarre", though I think 'shared interests' can be over-emphasized. Shared values are far more important.  Shared goals.  Friendship ... which is different from merely liking the same…"
4 hours ago
Chip replied to Kochak's discussion E AEEEEEEEEE !!!! Kochak here.....
"Welcome, Kochak"
4 hours ago
Lumberjoe replied to Nature of a Man's discussion A bizarre dating trend I see
""To me this just seems... weird, and doesn't seem to jive with history; romantic relationships to me are primarily about attraction and love, and the specific 'activities' you do together aren't really that important,…"
6 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service