As Professor Kirk in the first Narnia book said -- appalled that these young children weren't thinking logically enough -- "I wonder what they do teach them in these schools."

We were just talking on another thread about rhetoric -- something they didn't teach me back when and aren't teaching now. I'd like to see it: sound thinking, reasoned analysis of argument.

They *were* teaching geometry when I was in school, that is, Euclidean proofs. In my home state, at least, they've stopped doing that. Geometry is now descriptive -- "that's a square; that's a circle" -- and proofs are gone. (Possibly as a result of this trend, a math prof at a local college admitted to me he thinks some of his majors graduate without understanding how to do proofs. That's sort of like graduating an English major who can't read.)

I started thinking of this when a preacher I heard commented that whereas in the past, most people knew (or thought they did) the basics of the Judaic and Christian world view, the modern school system has inculcated ignorance of such things, and it's worked beautifully -- more people know next to nothing of this than ever before! But it occurs to me that although this was a special focus, our school system has also eliminated an understanding of how to think logically (by removing proofs). We don't get the basics of philosophy even in college (at least, I didn't, and I did take two philosophy classes).

To a sometimes partisan but less sweeping degree, parts of history have disappeared (and some have been disappeared for a long time). That can be fixed by better textbooks.

Geography also disappeared entirely from the curriculum while I was in school, which explains why we kept hearing about people who thought New Mexico was a foreign country.

What else is missing? What parts are worth fixing?

What will you do with your own children, if you have any, so they won't miss out on what our schools won't teach?

...and if you think this far, what materials will you be using?

Views: 77

Reply to This

Latest Activity

Edward Longshanks commented on Ian Wilson's group Out to Build Bridges
"Physically I feel a lot better having ,finally found the courage to come out of the closet to people. First night on AofM I outed myself in my status, and I am glad I finally outed myself to my best friend and my high school classmates"
28 minutes ago
J. R. Thompson replied to Nick's discussion Howdy from the Desert!
"Welcome to AOM."
1 hour ago
Nathanael replied to Will's discussion The red pill
"Poor Will, with his illusions of being happily married."
2 hours ago
Jeremy posted a photo
2 hours ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Joshua Wolf's discussion Fraternal orders for young men?
"boy scouts, 4H, FFA, Orderof Demolay, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc,"
2 hours ago
John White replied to Will's discussion The red pill
"because illusions are more important. "
2 hours ago
Tony Wolf replied to Joshua Wolf's discussion Fraternal orders for young men?
"I don't mean to harp on the meetup idea, but I know that there are quite a few successful meetups that do the sort of thing you're talking about - getting a taster of a different skill or trying a new activity (including charity/community…"
2 hours ago
Will replied to Will's discussion The red pill
"I think I'll take your word for it and not listen to those videos! I see the red pill's back on the main page again!  I see that it's for those that have the guts to face reality. Think I'll go face the reality of the lady…"
2 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service