Mine was a 1993 Mazda MX-6. Dark green 2-dr coupe with a V6 making 164 hp. Pretty quick for it's day. Got it when I was 17, September of '05. Had leather seats, cruise control, sunroof, I absolutely loved it.

Lasted me through the rest of high school, and after I moved to east Texas. Had my first "backseat lovin" experience in it one night at a rest stop, was cramped as hell but something I'll never forget. She ended up quitting on me (both the car and the girl) at 148,000 miles. Don't remember what exactly ended her life, but had problems with the speedometer not working until it got going a bit, the cruise went out towards the end, and was hit from behind by a lady on her phone. I sold it not too long after that. 

Views: 2160

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

A 1986 Ford Tempo.  I drove it for about 9 months, at which time I drove it over the side of a mountain.  I rolled the car, and that was the end of that....
A ten year old (at the time) 1973 Land Rover 88" Station Wagon. Drove it everywhere for two years, then replaced it with a 1959 Mercedes-Benz 190. I rather miss both of those vehicles.
1974 Ford Maverick.  Bought it for $500 from my grandfather in 1991.  Never had a more reliable car.  Didn't have any bells or whistles...AM radio with a single speaker in the dash, straight-six engine, no AC, no power steering or brakes - just a very simple, basic mode of transportation.  Traded it after a few years for a sporty little black Pontiac Sunbird that gave me nothing but trouble.  There are many days I wish I had my Maverick back.  Did a lot of cruising the town in that old car.  Picked up a few first dates in that car, and racked up thousands of miles going to visit a college girlfriend about 400 miles away.  Now, I drive a nice, well-equiped Chevy Silverado truck, and while I love my truck, the Old Mavvy will always have a special place in my hear.
1970 Ford LTD 2-door with a 390 four-barrel. Thousand wonders I didn't get killed in that car.
1978 Jeep CJ-7  bright red with Black hard top.  My dad bought it new.  It was a 4-speed and I learned to drive a stick shift on it.  Five years after he bought it, he handed the keys over to me. Like the '74 Maverick described by Gary, it was plain and simple and very reliable....... both on and off road.  Wish I still had it.

Mine was a faded blue 1966 Belair 4 door with the inline 6 and a the 2 speed automatic that was designed to go behind the big block. It had something north of 120,000 miles on it when I bought it for $200.00. It was a great first car. I was amazed that that little 250 motor would pin the speedometer on that big car especially with just that 2 speed trans.

 

Best Regards,

David

 

 

1977 Ford

Great truck.  Hand me down, and I was last in line.

Nice.  I had a 1978 F350 4x4 in college.  Similar to yours, but with square headlights.  Weird college kid car, but definitely scored some man points with a 460 bored .030 over, and 38 inch mud tires.  I drive a Toyota Tacoma now.  Less testosterone, more practical for my current lifestyle. 

Nice

 

1996 Toyota Supra TT 6 Speed. 

1992 Ford F-150 with the I-6 stick shift. Beat to hell but ran great. Still got her out back. Need Battery.

1980 Monte Carlo (I was 16 in 1996)

smallblock V8

metallic dark green paint, with pea green vinyl interior

bought it for $1200, still have the bill of sale from the car lot

RSS

Latest Activity

Steve Dallas replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"Per your last paragraph. No, misreading does not make one smart. I am saying that you are attempting to make an intelligent argument by doing the very same thing. You are trying to lump everyone into a tidy entity in order to make an over-arching…"
15 minutes ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Secret Lives of Men in the group The Great Debate
"It probably was a snake which frightened your sister. And you probably killed a rat. Philosophers. You recall a time you couldn't read?"
17 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"No, I think it just continues to show that your word choice sucks and that your arguments fall flat when we actually look at them. Just because you have repeated yourself, you haven't actually defended  your argument that historians are…"
26 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Shane's discussion Secret Lives of Men in the group The Great Debate
"For someone who claims to want to help "broken" or "split" men, she does a really crappy job by calling all emotions the feminine and insist that men find the feminine. She shows she actually doesn't understand men at all by…"
30 minutes ago
Lucius Artorius Castus replied to Regular Joe's discussion How To Spot An AoM Noob
"I skipped the wine and went straight to the 100 proof."
40 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Shane's discussion Secret Lives of Men in the group The Great Debate
"The definition of manliness relies upon the social sciences, which are inherently much harder to work as they deal with societies, cultures, and human individuals.  Therefore it's harder to develop an all encompassing theory to fit the…"
43 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"That seems just silly, why the hell aren't historians capable of dealing with current events? Also, understanding current events is completely different than (accurately) predicting their outcomes, but I'm beginning to notice that this is…"
47 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Shane's discussion Secret Lives of Men in the group The Great Debate
"I agree with you Titus.  Stoicism has its use in manly endeavors and to ensure that one can be stoic in the face of such endeavors practice is required."
48 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service