I often wonder why a lot of people get offended at various things that come up during conversation, in the news, on television or elsewhere. Personally, it takes me a lot to get offended. Im able to laugh at jokes about everyone and everything, even the highly controversial. Shows like South Park and Family Guy make fun of everyting: politics, sex, religion, women, minorities, mentally and physically challenged and those shows are celebrated and accepted. The UFC glorifies violence and that doesnt bother me in the least. Then again, lots of people got offended seeing Janet Jacksons nipple during the SuperBowl. I never quite understood why violence, especially with Americans, is praised while sexuality is to be treated like something shameful and terrible. My question is this: what does it take to offend you?

Views: 299

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I tend to be, as stupid/cliche as it sounds, offended by anyone demeaning someone else and being honest about it.

Men who can honestly say they think women belong in the kitchen get to me quite quickly. Likewise for honestly implying
that any group has a lower social worth
Does that annoy you more than someone feeling that way but lying to be socially accepted? As repulsive as those thoughts are, and I agree that they're horrible, isn't it at least good that they're being honest?
Hate
lol..think that's the shortest response I've ever posted...
Soooo... You're saying you hate hate:-?
Nah, I work very hard not to hate anything but try to understand.
Hate has a purpose sometimes. I wouldn"t condemn it outright. There are times when hate can just as, if not be more important than love
"Do I not hate those who hate you, O LORD, and abhor those who rise up against you?" Psalm 129:31
"But love your enemies [...] for He Himself is kind to ungrateful and evil men." ( Luke 6:35)

So who do you follow, David or Jesus?

The atheist in me finds it just delicious that you're using religion to justify hate, though. Not trying to offend, just being honest.
The atheist in me finds it just delicious that you're using religion to justify hate, though. Not trying to offend, just being honest.


I'm annoyed/offended by comments like that.

In addition to that, I also take great offense to intentional/conscious ignorance, disrespect, and arrogance. The idea that anyone is in any way shape or form superior to another. Just general wrong usually offends me, but those things prior stated particularly make me cringe.
Do you have an example of this?
Intentional ignorance.
Also my emotionally and comically inept college friends who seem to never get tired of rude and stupid jokes about my mother or my religious heritage.....sometimes I wonder about the fate of mankind.

RSS

Latest Activity

Profile IconPortnoy, Cutting Moulton and Vendetta joined Herb Munson's group
Thumbnail

The Great Debate

"Iron sharpens iron." A place for men to impact each other by debate and exchange of ideas. This is a group where no ideas are off limits. If your motto is, "I never talk about politics or religion," this group is probably not for you. A "gym" for thinkers.See More
12 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"He's just our resident... Idk what he is. Don't worry about it."
37 minutes ago
Vendetta replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/jilted-john-acquitted-texas-prostitute-death-article-1.1365975 He was acquitted because she essentially stole $150. And apparently there is a law in Texas that allows you to use deadly force during a night time…"
1 hour ago
Lumberjoe replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"The very act of signing up for and participating in the AOM forums is a criminal act! Have you met Brett (the owner/operator) personally to obtain his face-to-face permission to use this site? Nature of Man, turn yourself in!"
1 hour ago
Lumberjoe replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"And/or "deliberately obtuse", to quote one of our regulars."
1 hour ago
Lumberjoe replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"Every electronic internet purchase of anything ever is therefore illegal because, in every case, the buyer and seller do not consent, face-to-face, person-to-person, in the flesh, to exchange the goods for the money. Amazon, eBay, Alibaba (etc.):…"
1 hour ago
Vendetta replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"Battle of semantics.This guy is arguing for the sake of arguing."
1 hour ago
Vendetta replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"As one can't actually interact with 'anomymous strangers' and give consent in the flesh, the argument is that consent is therefore illegitimate and so is the contract. So I post a video on youtube. You believe I need to give "in…"
1 hour ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service