Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jamie Q on November 5, 2009 at 4:10pm

""This site is all about rescuing that baby."

Nice extension of the analogy. It works!

I absolutely believe that manliness has made some progress, especially in the area you mentioned. It's great to see men really talking to their fathers, sharing the emotional ups and downs of marriage with their guy friends. Most of that probably wouldn't have come about without some sort of identity crisis on the part of men; now that we're trying to reclaim "masculinity," we're taking a harder look at what that word really means. It's a great opportunity to make sure that the dirty bathwater stays out.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on November 5, 2009 at 8:21pm

I think it is important to consider that if men were being completely perfect examples of men then there wouldn't have been this sociatal bent towards un-manliness we have been experiencing over the last 40-50 years. I realize that is a bold statement but let be try to back that up:

-If men had been less oppressive of their wives, they wouldn't have had the femminist movement. A man SHOULD be the king in his castle but the wife should be the queen, not the handmaiden. It is important for a man to cater to his wife's needs while still being the "man".

-Feelings have a time and a place. When men didn't show any feelings at any time, societies response was "men" who were controlled by feelings.

-There is a philisophical explanation for this, called the correcting rod "or something like that". What it says if when a rmetal rod is bent, you must bend it beyond the desired amount of straightness in order to make it straight. That is to say, you much over-correct. This related to virtues. If one wanted to be patient but was very impatient, he must become extremely patient to a fault, then he will fall into the pattern of virtue.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Andrew Barbour on November 5, 2009 at 11:18pm

I totally agree with your comment "If men had been less oppressive of their wives, they wouldn't have had the femminist movement."

While we can all bemoan the decline of manliness over the past few decades, thankfully, many negative aspects of the old "male-centered" society have been severely weakened. The sexual, racial, and religious prejudices of our ancestors have mostly faded away.

We have an image of the "classic man" we aspire to be, but in reality, he was probably much more fallible than we think. There are exceptions, of course-- the best "classic men" really did stand up in the face of injustice and prejudice and led others toward righteousness, public opinion be damned. But in 1940's America, were all men like that? Not by a long shot.

But still, society demanded much more responsibility, chivalry, and sacrifice from its males. That, unfortunately, has faded too.

If we do take it upon ourselves to be a Man, there's no longer any pressure to subscribe to the BS of yesteryear. We can be that much closer to our best role models.

But then why doesn't everyone do this? Why is it so hard to be a Man? Because no one asks it of us anymore.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Peter O'Reilly on November 5, 2009 at 9:22pm

Great question. I'm with James in that we've made society more friendly towards women and that we can now be more open about our feelings. In addition, men of our grandfathers day were known for being at the very least slightly racist and homophobic. Most modern men don't hold those prejudices anymore either. Parenting has changed. Corporal punishment isnt what it used to be. That can be viewed either way depending on your views.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Yankee Cowboy Bob on November 5, 2009 at 10:38pm

It seems that we had a wild pendulum swinging for a while. Extreme feminism emasculated men, men wanted to please women by being like them and instead became more confused, then tried to go back again through extreme measures of "manliness" (like various "sporting" ways of proving themselves). So we get men that mix, say, American football and then "expressing their emotions" like girls.

Now the pendulum is settling down. I believe some of the effort of regaining (what, classic? traditional?) manliness involves nostalgia. Shaving like the old days (even though our fathers abandoned the safety razor for what they considered to be more efficient and less painful), old after shaves and colognes, using antiques or items that are traditionally made — you get the idea.

Fortunately, there are men that want to get back true manliness through character and not just looking and acting like men from a generation or three back. I suspect that one reason sites like AoM attract men that are spiritual or religiously minded is that manliness in character is a spiritual quest in part.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brett McKay on November 5, 2009 at 11:25pm

Obviously I would agree that character is at the center of manliness but what we wear, use, and shave with can play an underrated part in feeling like a man. People dismiss those things as merely "cultural," but I would argue that culture has been very devalued. A part of manliness is cultural and the reason that men of previous generations felt like men was both because of their character traits but also because they had a distinctive set of clothing, rituals, products, and other cultural artifacts that gave them enjoyment, confidence, and the feeling of manliness.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Yankee Cowboy Bob on November 6, 2009 at 5:37am

And if we don't have the culture and feel like a man, there's a good chance we won't act like real men. Yes, I do believe that. Physical things are powerful reminders of what you are.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Preston on November 6, 2009 at 10:38am

Well said. Looking and acting like a man is part of being a man. The external is the result of the internal, and they reinforce each other.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brett McKay on November 5, 2009 at 11:16pm

Excellent question, Daniel.

I think the progress we've made includes:

-being able to express our feelings without being called a sissy
-being able to pursue more "feminine" pursuits without being called a sissy
-being a stay at home dad has become a legitimate option
-we can have relationships with women who are our intellectual equals and have interests and a mind of their own
-men are expected to have a bigger role in raising children

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on November 7, 2009 at 2:52pm

Good point, we can't be run by our motions we should be able to control them. Control doesn't mean destroy, though. There is something to be said of a man who has no feelings... Teddy Roosevelt and all other great men were men of passion, but they didn't let that passion control them. It isn't about being an emotional sissy, its about being a human with passion and substance.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jamie Q on November 9, 2009 at 2:41pm

"Being emotional is overrated."

Ah, but we're all emotional. The key is to understand and correctly process those emotions so that you control (and use) them, rather than the other way around. Being able to talk about our emotions enables us to better control them down the road, thus enabling us "to have a good strong view thats not warped by my emotions at the time."

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Yankee Cowboy Bob on November 7, 2009 at 1:04pm

Waitaminnit...manly progress in the last fifty years? Why, that's me! I'm fifty.
(crickets)

• ▶ Reply