Is it just me, or is it pretty messed up that people are legally required to pay for car insurance? I mean, insurance is supposed to be a service that someone pays for because they want to have it for sense of security or whatever, but what is up with having to be forced into buying it by state mandate or law?

Anyone have a good rationale for why a society will force you to pay insurance on your car, even though you do not want to?

Views: 509

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Cars are dangerous, but our society is literally built around the assumption that hundreds of millions of people will own hundreds of millions of private automobiles. For this to work, the real costs of our car culture must be spread very thin.

Real costs = cars themselves, roads, pollution, foreign policy dominated by petroleum policy, costs of accidents (not just repairs, but medical care, lost productivity while recovering from injuries, etc.). It's a very long tally.

Part of this cost spreading is to require everyone to have insurance. Insurance spreads the costs of accidents from accident victims, to drivers, to corporations, to stockholders. The smallest car accident, which can be caused by even the best drivers, can lead to hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills. Without insurance, whose paying those bills?

The victim - not fair

The driver - possibly fair, but not efficient to wipe out someone's assets for a small accident; also, unlikely, given our bankruptcy laws, which would put the cost back on the victim

The government, with public healthcare - not as fair as putting some cost to the person who caused the accident

The risks are different with first-party insurance. If your home burns down, only you are financially ruined, and no stranger third-party is hurt. Likewise with your choice to carry health insurance.

And mandatory liability insurance isn't all that rare. Most businesses, in order to operate, are required to carry insurance, either by the government or a customer or a supplier. And home owner's insurance, necessary for a mortgage, includes liability coverage.

Good grief that was a messy answer.



Tried to condense 80 pages of Prof. Abraham's case book into one post, as well as my own distaste for automobiles.

At least I didn't bring up how the minimum insurance mandated by the government doesn't fully cover even a small injury accident. Insurance law hasn't kept pace with the cost of medical care (and even automobiles).

You're not forced to insure your car.  Nobody gives a damn if you fix your car.  We just want you to fix ours if you screw-up.  You're forced to insure for damage you do with your car.  Its liability insurance, not collision and comprehensive insurance (which is elective).  State-mandated insurance won't fix your car ... it will fix the other guy's car, or house, or body, etc. if/when you make a mistake.

It is reasonable to require you to take financial responsibility in exchange for the privilege of driving.


It is reasonable to require you to take financial responsibility in exchange for the privilege of driving.

Perfectly said!

So you guys must completely and fully agree with being legally required to pay for healthcare, life, and home insurance, eh? Alongside every "privilege" that a person has where there is insurance available for it. I wish I was as rich as you dudes...

That is not what he said.

On house insurance, that is enforced from the banks to cover the risk of their asset you are inhabiting as you slowly buy it from them.  
Regarding areas where the state covers the insurance cost, that is to allow the communities to rebuild and keep society stable.  I personally don't think we should pay house site lost twice to the same natural disaster from federal funds.


On health insurance are you saying you think people should have to prove ability to pay before ambulances are dispatched or people are admitted?

Good grief.  Do you understand the difference between liability insurance and comprehensive, homeowners, life, health, etc.?

Auto liability insurance laws require you to be able to pay for damage you cause to somebody else.  Health insurance, homeowners insurance, comprehensive insurance, life insurance, etc. pay for damage to yourself (actually, life pays your family if you croak, but it doesn't really matter for this conversation).

I don't think you should be forced to buy any insurance to repair your own body, or house, or car, or whatever.  If you wreck your car, or burn down your house, or break your arm ... and you can't afford to fix it ... I don't care.  Do without.  Your problem.  If you damage my car, and can't afford to fix it ... I care.  Liability insurance pays for the damage to my car, not yours.

Auto liability insurance is pretty cheap.


Well said.  It shifts the costs of damages from the state to the person causing it.

Would you prefer debtors prison or debt bondage? Auto insurance is a condition of you taking on the privilege of driving. You can easily avoid paying it if you decide not to drive. I do wish there was some way you could self insure like with a savings account equal to the amount that liability would cover, a portion of that or some other set amount. You could then be saving that money and earning interest.

Actually, Texas (California, too) allows you to post a bond rather than pay for insurance.

Page 21, towards the bottom:


Latest Activity

Kevin Collier replied to Sen's discussion Most Cost Effective Rifle in the group Riflemen
"J.R. has a very good point about buying used. I am so used to it, I forget that."
16 minutes ago
J. R. Thompson replied to Sen's discussion Most Cost Effective Rifle in the group Riflemen
"While there's nothing at all wrong with buying used, I generally wouldn't suggest it to a first time gun buyer, especially someone with little previous firearms experience. Yes, you can buy one in "like new" condition, but at…"
1 hour ago
Jason Padenson posted a photo
1 hour ago
Pale Horse replied to John Muir's discussion How to avoid a speeding ticket
"Eh, it's best to go with the flow within reason. Just make sure you're slower than the other guy. Unless it's a bloody speed trap. Then don't give those jerks an opportunity to gouge you."
1 hour ago
Daniel replied to John Muir's discussion How to avoid a speeding ticket
"I say it's better to go the speed limit that "go with the flow of traffic" at 90mph. My daily commute is similar, but I go the speed limit, and I've never had anyone crash into the back of me, or felt like a rock in a river. The…"
4 hours ago
John Smith replied to John Smith's discussion Creating an Online Freelance Business?
"Craig, do you think it's worth paying the extra yearly fee ($89 vs. $69) to Divi for the "Premium plugins"? I honestly don't even know what that is."
4 hours ago
Joseph Mcallen left a comment for Tarquin Anstruther
"Hi. Just wanted to apologize for not answering your chat invite. I was at school and had the website running on the back, So I didn't see your mssg until it was time for class to start and I started shutting down all other apps. I'm sorry…"
5 hours ago
Joseph Mcallen left a comment for Chip
"Hey, Chip. Thanks for the invite. I saw you a while ago but as soon as I sent you a mssg it said you had logged out. I guess you are about 7 hours ahead so maybe getting late. Maybe wil meet some other time. Have a good one."
5 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service