What is a man when you think about it? What qualities make someone a man? 

Views: 1113

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The Y-chromosome springs to mind...or does that make him only male?

I'll go with the definition researcher David Gilmore gleaned by looking at cultures around the world:  a (manly) man is brave, economically successful, responsible, generous, sexually capable, procreative, and sociable with other men.

http://artofmanliness.com/2009/02/12/is-manliness-obsolete/

So there is being simply a man, and then there's being a Manly man?

I would add to that the parameters of dignified, protective, resilient, charitable, traditional, and owning a full and manly beard. 

If you're serious, Carl, I'll say:  yes -- there's often a difference between being something and being the ideal version of it.

I say a man is an adult male who takes repsonsibility for his life.  According to your definition, Will, I'm not a man. 

It wouldn't be politic to ask why not!

because I can't procreate, am not economically successful, or sociable with other men.

 

We all have our limits.  I'm not very sociable.  I'm not rich, but surely we should all aspire to have enough to support our lives' missions, whatever that is.  Take what fits, and set priorities.  

I'll agree with the basic answer of the y-chromosome. After that there are only qualified states: manly man, sportsman, the gentleman, a good man, ladies man, and so on each with their +/-connotations and stereotypes.

What qualities make someone a man?

A formidable stash of the best porn.

In just seven days?

RSS

Latest Activity

John Muir replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"I can speak for my family - which contained at least 4 confederate soldiers in my immediate lineage.  I know they were opposed to slavery because they were buried in cemeteries in the Wesleyan Methodist churches they were baptized before the…"
26 minutes ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Moq"
2 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Whom are you replying to?"
2 hours ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"All I do know, is that the motivations of government are often very different then the motivations of the common man. And very different from the what the propagandists would have you believe."
6 hours ago
derick bean posted a status
7 hours ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"I don't want this to descend into a debate about the civil war. All I'm saying is I don't know what the common soldier was fighting for/thought they were fighting for, or what their family thought they were fighting for. In an age…"
7 hours ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"His history is extremely one sided. He completely ignores the fact that 4.5 slave states remained in the Union, 4.5 left the Union only after the attack on Fort Sumter, the same economic warfare England had used on the American colonies the North…"
7 hours ago
Dominic replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"I think the thing about when neo-confederates pull out the "ordinary soldier didn't fight for slavery" argument is that few, if any, ever cite actual soldiers' words in support of this argument. Surely there are CSA soldier…"
8 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service