The jacket is dark brown with barely visible light greenish-blue checks.

Would a plain-white shirt go with it? What about deep oxford blue? What about a white shirt with thin widely strapped black straps? What about a light blue stripe shirt? Stripes though, probably don't go with checks, do they?

Would a white plain (think mad men, Don Draper) pocket square go with it? If not - what would?


Since it's a sports jacket, I think no tie should be worn with it, and the top shirt button unbuttoned.

I'd be wearing black shoes (no patterns) and either dark blue jeans or one of these trousers (which ones would go with it, and which are more versatile, by the way?):

1) http://statics.suitsupply.com/images/products/Trousers/zoom/Trouser...

2) http://statics.suitsupply.com/images/products/Trousers/zoom/Trouser...

Appreciate any advice!

Views: 213

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'd probably try to emphasize the greenish-blue in the jacket and choose a very pale green or blue button-down shirt with no stripes.  It sounds like all your surrounding components are neutral, so most colors would work as long as they're not too strong.

Look to nature when combining colors.  God did a great job with color palettes.

 

Brown reminds me of bark, like a tree.  So, think colors you would find on a tree...green is obvious, but also blue, pink, yellow, lavender, etc.

 

Though you identified it as being subtle, checkers can be thought of as a strong pattern. I would stick with neutrals, which for you means solids, when coordinating.  Extremely subtle patterns, ones which when viewed at arms length while squinting appear solid, might also work, but be careful.

RSS

Latest Activity

Lumpy52403 replied to Mark Sanderson's discussion My story in the group The Shirtless Man
"That sounds awesome!"
1 hour ago
Jack Bauer replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"I'd like to see a citation on that case. JB"
1 hour ago
Liam Strain replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
""...And have also made other incorrect statements, such as that rape is an issue of force, not consent..." I recognize the flaw in my hurried statements in the chat. I am not making the Schafly argument. Nor have I stated such a position…"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"By your definition of "consent", I never sold my house."
1 hour ago
Nature of a Man replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"You have self defined the only type of consent that is valid, as consent given, individual to individual, in person.  I believe this definition ties in with objective realities, whether biological, psychological or otherwise.Your…"
2 hours ago
Nature of a Man replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
"1. Yes, they would, but you're free to provide a citation as to why they wouldn't. 2. That statement is meaningless if you're unable to rectify the misunderstanding, as opposed to just assert it.3. I'm understanding correctly,…"
3 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
""I'd venture that the Founding Fathers would disagree with you on that, and wouldn't agree with your assertion that objective reality is defined by the state"1. They wouldn't.  2. That's not his argument -…"
3 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to Nature of a Man's discussion Pornography and property in the group The Great Debate
""On the contrary, the argument is that the objective reality is that consent is impossible to give to begin with."You have self defined the only type of consent that is valid, as consent given, individual to individual, in person. But you…"
3 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service