"http://www.nationalservice.gov/programs/americorps/segal-americorps-education-award"
what finger do you wear a ring on and what ring is manlier
im trieing to figure out what finger is the manliest to where a ring on i would definently where it on the right so middle? right ring? pinky? i think either the pinky or the right ring finger but can figure it out and witch of these rings is the manliest?
http://www.claddaghsilver.com/silver-celtic-ring-mens-with-emerald/
or
http://www.claddaghsilver.com/celtic-rings/sterling-silver-celtic-m...
is the emerald in the middle not manly and tell so im just going to ask you guys btw im new here just got my membership approved i think im going to like this site
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Native Son on -
Neither ring is my "style", so I can't help there. Historically, men's rings are worn on the ring finger, the one next to the pinkie. Class rings (mostly Service Academies these days) and wedding bands on the left hand. Signet rings tend to go on the pinkie, a hold over from the days when letters and documents were sealed with hot wax.
The left hand preference is likely due to most men being right-handed and back in the day of routinely bearing arms, one wouldn't want anything interfering with your sword hand's grip.
-
Permalink Reply by L De Guzmán on -
I agree with Native Son on where you should wear your ring - the ring finger.
Given a choice between the two rings you showed, the first one is more masculine; it being more bulky.
-
Permalink Reply by Will on -
I like the second one, as it looks more Celtic and less like the Death Star. Don't know what's manlier.
I'm no expert, but to me a pinky ring seems effete.
-
Permalink Reply by Marty on -
Will...Don't tell that (effete) to Tony Soprano or you will be eating his ring
-
Permalink Reply by Will on
-
It's like football players slapping each other on the ass. When you're that tough, you could wear a tutu.
-
Permalink Reply by Rich T on -
I have to agree with Will the second ring on ring finger. However, you should try to get a ring that goes well with the size of your hand. Large hand larger ring small hand smaller ring. Go to a jewelry store and try on a few rings to see what looks best. The Celtic design looks great with the emerald colored stone.
-
Permalink Reply by Cisco Carson on
-
Not to be offensive, but both rings look cheap. Think simple for a ring, the ring shouldn't wear you.
http://www.amazon.com/Sterling-Silver-Mens-Celtic-Black/dp/B005OQJFJW
-
Permalink Reply by Chuck Knight on -
I like this ring. Nice choice, Cisco.
I also have a penchant for 4-8 strand puzzle rings. http://www.amazon.com/Sterling-Silver-Celtic-Puzzle-Sizes/dp/B00023...
-
Permalink Reply by Cisco Carson on
-
My personal choice is this number.
-
Permalink Reply by Jon Murphy on
-
that shield ring is so nice i would get that over the other two i posted if i had the $800 to spend on a ring
-
Permalink Reply by Shahan on -
Rings can be worn on almost any finger you like. Traditionally on the ring-finger, obviously, or on the pinkie-finger (although this last, is usually reserved for signet-rings).
-
Permalink Reply by Chuck Knight on
-
For a general ring, not a specific one like a wedding ring, it's common to wear it on your right hand. And, most commonly they're worn on the "ring finger" which is the 4th digit.
But, depending on the ring, and a sense of scale, they can be worn on any finger.
My own preference for vintage turquoise means that some of my rings are huge, and I wear the huge rings on my middle finger. It gives a better sense of balance. This is my most recent acquisition, and it is a beautiful piece.
There are also, if you're in to that sort of thing, specific meanings for rings worn on specific fingers.
Latest Activity
Slacker replied to Slacker's discussion Taking credit for community projects? in the group Freemasonry
Vytautas replied to Vytautas's discussion Favorite Author in the group Latin"Ah but it's a damn good poem! But no wonder it was never translated until the late 1900s. Nearly 20 centuries of censorship!
But despite some prudishness, it's very important for discussing the relationship between poet, persona, and…"
"Nowhere in the Bible does it say we are to tell someone we love them. Words can be said, but the intent of one's heart may not line up with them. And that can be deliberate or unintentional.
One's actions normally…"
Harbinger of Naughtforge commented on Leif Gunnar Selberg's blog post should I help younger brother become smoker?"It is never too late to destroy yourself yet if you wish to build yourself you ought to refrain from useless and negative activities. Does he want to have a badly functioning body?"
Dallas the Phallus replied to Dallas the Phallus's discussion Tamar Gendler: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Politics and Economics in the group Autodidacts"I thought it was a good lecture, too. Though this was my first introduction to Rawls and Nozick (I knew of Hobbs). I have no education in any economic theories, nor have I read any of the classics of economics, though I have read a little about…"
© 2013 Created by Brett McKay.
Powered by
