Ok i hope i'm formulating his right.

I wondered how good chatting is, like not chatting with people from the internet, but chatting with people you know in real life. Is it a manly thing to chat with girls? I have the feeling it is not. But i wonder why that is? 

Or do you see this different? I just would like to hear your opinions! 

And very important: If you have no other chance to chat with a girl, for example on a long distance relationship (which of course is an exception) how do you chat manly? Because i haven't seen this asked somewhere.

Tags: Chatting, Networks, Social

Views: 456

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It depends on how you talk and act. I think it's probably manly to be yourself and comfortable with that. Talk to whoever you want. I chat to loads of girls as friends but I treat them as though they are one of the lads (men/ boys) but then i chat to loads of lads as well. 

I would disagree with one point. It is manly to chat with girls, but treat them like girls. Its perfectly acceptable to carry on intelligent conversation with girls, but I never talk to them like one of the guys. But then again, I was raised not to even cuss around a girl...

Yeah i'm agreeing with you, if i talk to a girl like i do to a guy, it never works.

"But then again, I was raised not to even cuss around a girl..."

Glad that people like you still exist.

I behave different as well. But in general, I'm at least slightly formal to everyone at least close friends.

I was raised not to even cuss. :P

I am basically the same here, but with one exception.... as a rugby player, I will talk to the female ruggers the same way as I do men. I learned very quickly that they will talk to you the same way, and expect it in return, and are not offended by any "enhanced vocabulary"

Yeah, these are the girls that are in the friendzone anyway and they know it. I guess I don't talk to them as if they were guys but I treat them equally and I don't joke with them in the same way either haha.

Thats intresting to know. For me this almost never works, but in real life its totally different. Maybe its jsut that some people can chat well and some don't?

I would rather speak in person myself.

I wish there would be only this...

Then there would be two possibilities:

1.  "ASSIMILATE" -The Borg

2.  "EXTERMINATE" -The Daleks

What do you mean by "chatting"?  I've never been big on talking just for the sake of talking.  If that's what you mean by "chatting", I'd vote "no".  But, honestly, I just suck at small talk.  I'm not much of a people person, anyway.

 

Say something when you have something to say.  Don't say something just to fill the silence. 


JB

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Joshua's discussion Democratic presidential nomination in the group The Great Debate
"He is much more inline, doctrinally speaking, with many Scandinavian countries. Free enterprise, but socialized medicine and education. Perfect reason not to vote for him then."
4 minutes ago
Shane replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"She needs punched in the face."
8 minutes ago
Travis Spuhler replied to Joshua's discussion Democratic presidential nomination in the group The Great Debate
"There is honest to make-believe-god NO republican candidate who has a snowballs chance in hell of beating a Democrat presidential nominee, again. Seriously, every single current candidate has some major mark against them that means they will not…"
9 minutes ago
Shane replied to Joshua's discussion Democratic presidential nomination in the group The Great Debate
"easier for them to access birth control and their right to choose to get an abortion Lip service.  It can't get any easier, and even if it could, there's nothing the office of the President can do on the issue. He also has supported…"
15 minutes ago
Travis Spuhler replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Firstly, this crap has been seriously trumped up by anti-abortion and pro-life groups. http://skepchick.org/2015/07/planned-parenthood-is-not-selling-baby-parts-you-fucking-idiots/ This really is much ado about nothing."
17 minutes ago
Thomas Wayne replied to Joshua's discussion Democratic presidential nomination in the group The Great Debate
"He has a lot of ideas about internal affairs that I like, such as assisting women in making it easier for them to access birth control and their right to choose to get an abortion- both of which in my opinion help women be healthier mentally and…"
34 minutes ago
Shane replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"I'm pretty sure the negotiation is done before hand."
42 minutes ago
Joe W replied to Regular Joe's discussion What's a brutha gotta do to get some soap on a rope around here?
"Uh, we weren't supposed to talk about that"
46 minutes ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service