Ok i hope i'm formulating his right.

I wondered how good chatting is, like not chatting with people from the internet, but chatting with people you know in real life. Is it a manly thing to chat with girls? I have the feeling it is not. But i wonder why that is? 

Or do you see this different? I just would like to hear your opinions! 

And very important: If you have no other chance to chat with a girl, for example on a long distance relationship (which of course is an exception) how do you chat manly? Because i haven't seen this asked somewhere.

Tags: Chatting, Networks, Social

Views: 465

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It depends on how you talk and act. I think it's probably manly to be yourself and comfortable with that. Talk to whoever you want. I chat to loads of girls as friends but I treat them as though they are one of the lads (men/ boys) but then i chat to loads of lads as well. 

I would disagree with one point. It is manly to chat with girls, but treat them like girls. Its perfectly acceptable to carry on intelligent conversation with girls, but I never talk to them like one of the guys. But then again, I was raised not to even cuss around a girl...

Yeah i'm agreeing with you, if i talk to a girl like i do to a guy, it never works.

"But then again, I was raised not to even cuss around a girl..."

Glad that people like you still exist.

I behave different as well. But in general, I'm at least slightly formal to everyone at least close friends.

I was raised not to even cuss. :P

I am basically the same here, but with one exception.... as a rugby player, I will talk to the female ruggers the same way as I do men. I learned very quickly that they will talk to you the same way, and expect it in return, and are not offended by any "enhanced vocabulary"

Yeah, these are the girls that are in the friendzone anyway and they know it. I guess I don't talk to them as if they were guys but I treat them equally and I don't joke with them in the same way either haha.

Thats intresting to know. For me this almost never works, but in real life its totally different. Maybe its jsut that some people can chat well and some don't?

I would rather speak in person myself.

I wish there would be only this...

Then there would be two possibilities:

1.  "ASSIMILATE" -The Borg

2.  "EXTERMINATE" -The Daleks

What do you mean by "chatting"?  I've never been big on talking just for the sake of talking.  If that's what you mean by "chatting", I'd vote "no".  But, honestly, I just suck at small talk.  I'm not much of a people person, anyway.

 

Say something when you have something to say.  Don't say something just to fill the silence. 


JB

RSS

Latest Activity

Sam K replied to David R.'s discussion Profanity and Vulgarity
"Fair enough then Jack - fact is I don't do it intentionally, it requires background information to make sense. If someone disagrees point blank, then I feel the need to flesh it out by explaining it in more detail.But when it becomes this…"
26 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to David R.'s discussion Profanity and Vulgarity
"I don't know that I've ever been mistaken for "coy" before.  Nor have I been mistaken for somebody that can't follow complicated trains of thought. I am fine with theories.  I'm fine with complicated theories…"
40 minutes ago
Sam K replied to David R.'s discussion Profanity and Vulgarity
"Could be a combination of factors.However I've noticed similarities between words of similar sounds.For example the "f-" word rhymes with "muck, yuck, and uck" which while not considered obscenties also refer to…"
41 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to David R.'s discussion Profanity and Vulgarity
"As the guy that brought it up here, and as the guy that loves to bring it up to new women, it has absolutely dick to do with the sound. It is an extremely sexual word that they almost never made a connection with, and when they finally do, they can…"
1 hour ago
Sir Edmund left a comment for Juan Gabriel
"Just approved your request, can chat anytime"
1 hour ago
Mìchael H. replied to Greg Michael Shafer's discussion Public Fight
"You did the right thing. It's natural to wonder about "the road not taken," and if you were to retaliate physically, you would probably be wishing you had tried to talk him down instead. If he had continued to push you around after…"
3 hours ago
Sam K replied to David R.'s discussion Profanity and Vulgarity
"that you missed the simple observation that women aren't bothered by the same sound in the word "hoist". So -- it's a lousy, overcomplicated theory that is so deep down the rabbit hole that it's borderline meaningless"
3 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to David R.'s discussion Profanity and Vulgarity
"I don't see that any of this dissertation on comparative linguistics, ancient languages, or primal ancestral sounds helps anyone figure why chicks are averse to the word "moist".  Which was the original question. There are three…"
3 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service