Ok i hope i'm formulating his right.

I wondered how good chatting is, like not chatting with people from the internet, but chatting with people you know in real life. Is it a manly thing to chat with girls? I have the feeling it is not. But i wonder why that is? 

Or do you see this different? I just would like to hear your opinions! 

And very important: If you have no other chance to chat with a girl, for example on a long distance relationship (which of course is an exception) how do you chat manly? Because i haven't seen this asked somewhere.

Tags: Chatting, Networks, Social

Views: 432

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It depends on how you talk and act. I think it's probably manly to be yourself and comfortable with that. Talk to whoever you want. I chat to loads of girls as friends but I treat them as though they are one of the lads (men/ boys) but then i chat to loads of lads as well. 

I would disagree with one point. It is manly to chat with girls, but treat them like girls. Its perfectly acceptable to carry on intelligent conversation with girls, but I never talk to them like one of the guys. But then again, I was raised not to even cuss around a girl...

Yeah i'm agreeing with you, if i talk to a girl like i do to a guy, it never works.

"But then again, I was raised not to even cuss around a girl..."

Glad that people like you still exist.

I behave different as well. But in general, I'm at least slightly formal to everyone at least close friends.

I was raised not to even cuss. :P

I am basically the same here, but with one exception.... as a rugby player, I will talk to the female ruggers the same way as I do men. I learned very quickly that they will talk to you the same way, and expect it in return, and are not offended by any "enhanced vocabulary"

Yeah, these are the girls that are in the friendzone anyway and they know it. I guess I don't talk to them as if they were guys but I treat them equally and I don't joke with them in the same way either haha.

Thats intresting to know. For me this almost never works, but in real life its totally different. Maybe its jsut that some people can chat well and some don't?

I would rather speak in person myself.

I wish there would be only this...

Then there would be two possibilities:

1.  "ASSIMILATE" -The Borg

2.  "EXTERMINATE" -The Daleks

What do you mean by "chatting"?  I've never been big on talking just for the sake of talking.  If that's what you mean by "chatting", I'd vote "no".  But, honestly, I just suck at small talk.  I'm not much of a people person, anyway.

 

Say something when you have something to say.  Don't say something just to fill the silence. 


JB

RSS

Latest Activity

Nathanael replied to Nathanael's discussion Common-sense gun laws, what would they look like for you? in the group The Great Debate
"Yeah, because there's no way I could have seen it in one of the national media reports, and my opinions should change because of an emotionally-charged visual."
26 seconds ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Nathanael's discussion Common-sense gun laws, what would they look like for you? in the group The Great Debate
"Yea, like "Why couldn't my kid fight back?"A gun gives an unfair advantage to an attacker. Guns have been proven to lay down a fair field.  "
5 minutes ago
Walter B. Pewen replied to Nathanael's discussion Common-sense gun laws, what would they look like for you? in the group The Great Debate
"You might think twice about all of your firearm stuff if you were here in Santa Barbara and saw the photo of the father of one of the slain kids in Isla Vista."
19 minutes ago
Bryan updated their profile photo
22 minutes ago
Nathanael replied to Nathanael's discussion Common-sense gun laws, what would they look like for you? in the group The Great Debate
"It's certainly frustrating when driving in NoVA.  Miss a freeway exit while carrying and I'm suddenly a felon (one who is unlikely to be caught, of course, but still)."
25 minutes ago
Brett McKay replied to Regular Joe's discussion To circumcise or not to circumcise . . .
"The community rules exist as a general standard. But to enforce them very strictly in every case would be both impossible and undesirable. The way people break the rules is not the same, nor is the likability of the person breaking them. There are…"
27 minutes ago
Nathanael replied to Nathanael's discussion Common-sense gun laws, what would they look like for you? in the group The Great Debate
"A few points. 1.  People with mental health problems aren't the cause of most gun violence (or violence by any other means).  Most shootings are committed for the standard criminal reasons: money, drugs, sex, gang affiliation,…"
27 minutes ago
Will replied to Nathanael's discussion Common-sense gun laws, what would they look like for you? in the group The Great Debate
"We talked abt it in chat, but:  Obamacare was meant to "improve health care," and it didn't involve hiring doctors, nurses, orderlies, or even janitors.  Instead, it involved hiring hordes of IRS agents and HHS staff.…"
37 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service