Ok i hope i'm formulating his right.

I wondered how good chatting is, like not chatting with people from the internet, but chatting with people you know in real life. Is it a manly thing to chat with girls? I have the feeling it is not. But i wonder why that is? 

Or do you see this different? I just would like to hear your opinions! 

And very important: If you have no other chance to chat with a girl, for example on a long distance relationship (which of course is an exception) how do you chat manly? Because i haven't seen this asked somewhere.

Views: 467

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It depends on how you talk and act. I think it's probably manly to be yourself and comfortable with that. Talk to whoever you want. I chat to loads of girls as friends but I treat them as though they are one of the lads (men/ boys) but then i chat to loads of lads as well. 

I would disagree with one point. It is manly to chat with girls, but treat them like girls. Its perfectly acceptable to carry on intelligent conversation with girls, but I never talk to them like one of the guys. But then again, I was raised not to even cuss around a girl...

Yeah i'm agreeing with you, if i talk to a girl like i do to a guy, it never works.

"But then again, I was raised not to even cuss around a girl..."

Glad that people like you still exist.

I behave different as well. But in general, I'm at least slightly formal to everyone at least close friends.

I was raised not to even cuss. :P

I am basically the same here, but with one exception.... as a rugby player, I will talk to the female ruggers the same way as I do men. I learned very quickly that they will talk to you the same way, and expect it in return, and are not offended by any "enhanced vocabulary"

Yeah, these are the girls that are in the friendzone anyway and they know it. I guess I don't talk to them as if they were guys but I treat them equally and I don't joke with them in the same way either haha.

Thats intresting to know. For me this almost never works, but in real life its totally different. Maybe its jsut that some people can chat well and some don't?

I would rather speak in person myself.

I wish there would be only this...

Then there would be two possibilities:

1.  "ASSIMILATE" -The Borg

2.  "EXTERMINATE" -The Daleks

What do you mean by "chatting"?  I've never been big on talking just for the sake of talking.  If that's what you mean by "chatting", I'd vote "no".  But, honestly, I just suck at small talk.  I'm not much of a people person, anyway.

 

Say something when you have something to say.  Don't say something just to fill the silence. 


JB

RSS

Latest Activity

Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Here's a point that Trump supporters should think about.  Everyone knows you love to hear him talk like "Trump".  The goal in a general is broaden your support.  Not pander to your base. Trump didn't answer any…"
1 minute ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/780597941979480064 4-D Chess. And here I was doubting him, wondering why he held back. Taking a rook is worth losing a pawn."
20 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Sir's discussion Are you better off? in the group The Great Debate
"Reducing the answer to that question to a single statistic is moronic.  Using one that is easily manipulated, absent any context or critical thought, is worse.  That answer is either intellectually dishonest, intellectually vacant ... or…"
51 minutes ago
G Cooper updated their profile
1 hour ago
Dominic replied to Sir's discussion Are you better off? in the group The Great Debate
"Unemployment in 2006 was 4.7. 2016 is 4.9. At the height of the recession, it was 10. So yes, we're better off."
1 hour ago
Dominic replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"I don't suppose the lack of evidence has any bearing on throwing around statements like that or any attempt at perceiving reality."
2 hours ago
Shannon N. Clark replied to Michael's discussion Has my Faith Made me Weak?
"Sounds like you had a good learning experience. I bet you'll do better next time. "
4 hours ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"I'll be more specific. The Clinton Foundation has: -killed masses of people on two continents by denying aid they've collected money for -laundered hundreds of millions of dollars for weapons sales -collected hundreds of millions in…"
5 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service