Just some insights anyone willing to share points of views.

Views: 482

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Lack of trust.

Not having a bond, if a marriage is held together by "things" that aren't each other. If a marriage is held together just for example the childrens sake, the mortgage, appearances etc. A marriage should be held together by each other, if everything was removed the couple should want to stay together.

Just my 2 cents.

A marriage isn't an entity that exists on its own.   It is entirely a product of the participants.  It is toxic if you're toxic; it won't be if you're not.  As for what constitutes a toxic spouse ... did you have anything more specific?

There are very few occasions where marital problems are one-sided.  If a marriage isn't working, there's probably something each spouse can do to push in the right direction.

JB

But one spouse cannot be the only one pushing; it takes two working together.  If you can't work together at the same time then it's over.

One of the main problems marriages have is that it is made up of two individuals.  When it gets to the point where any one individual cannot or will not look at things from the other individual's perspective then there is going to be problems.  When it gets to that point things will start becoming a tit-for-tat battle.  "Well he/she did this so I'll do that".

To start fixing the marriage you have to both agree to forgive and not bring up the past.  This is one of the hardest things to do especially when arguing.

Take the biggest problem (one or maybe two) the hot button thing and work on that first, ignore the rest while you work on those; again this is hard as it is not (really) just one or two things but a whole slew of things that have built up over time.  Once you get that thing down work on the next 'hot button issue' but don't forget the previous issue(s).  But, again, you both have to agree to this in writing with signatures.

 

BUT, what do I know, I'm having difficulties in my marriage so take it for what it's worth.

I disagree, with a few exceptions.  One spouse can very often change the entire tone of the marriage ... generally, by visibly and intentionally putting their spouse before themselves, by giving the wife/husband what she/he needs even if you're not getting it back.  By sacrificing rather than struggling.  It ain't easy in a toxic environment ... but, it can right the ship.

 

Like I said, there are exceptions.  But, most people who think they're an exception, haven't tried it ... and probably aren't.

 

JB

Thank you for your input and sincerity.

I'll back that up, having experienced some very difficult times in my marriage.  Thanks to some dedicated communication from both of us, it's better now than it's been in years.

Hey Rick
Just because there are problems doesn't mean you haven't hit the nail on the head with your post. It's so easy to have problems in a marriage, but so tough to find solutions that give enough satisfaction to two people to be workable. Speaking from my own experience. Obviously this is why it is so critical to choose a good spouse, but given enough time and a few poor decisions, even the best marriage can turn into the proverbial hot mess.

A toxic marriage is one that harms, rather than aids, the well-being of the spouses and/or their children.

I very much agree with this definition.  Dysfunctional is not the same a toxic.  There are some situations that you can "live with", but a toxic situation is one that is actively destroying the participant.

One that involves contempt.  That's also a doomed marriage.

Lol..

RSS

Latest Activity

Paul MacAlindin replied to Paul MacAlindin's discussion "I like guns" in the group The Great Debate
"Would love to see that data. Can you provide the link, please?"
50 minutes ago
David Egerdahl replied to VH's discussion What's your workout?
1 hour ago
Suburban Sentinel replied to Farris's discussion Business casual laptop bag
"I don't think your budget for a good quality leather bag is realistic, even if you buy it used. Might want to take a look at canvas/leather briefcases from places like Filson or Duluth Pack"
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Paul MacAlindin's discussion "I like guns" in the group The Great Debate
"I looked into this once.  Per capita, US gun massacres are comparable to those in other Western countries.  Wikipedia can help."
1 hour ago
Farris replied to Farris's discussion Business casual laptop bag
"Thanks guys. My main hangups were from reviews saying that the bag fell apart after a few weeks and left stains on clothing. After my post, work told me that I'd be getting a new laptop. I may hold off to make sure that it's not too big."
3 hours ago
VH replied to VH's discussion What's your workout?
"I'm a big fan of bodyweight exercises. Hadn't heard of the Lauren book. I'll have to check it out."
4 hours ago
VH replied to VH's discussion What's your workout?
"That looks pretty serious. I almost hesitate to ask: What's "back to normal?""
4 hours ago
Nick H replied to Paul MacAlindin's discussion "I like guns" in the group The Great Debate
"Using psychologist to determine if someone is entitled to a nation's rights is a dangerous path to follow. Don't forget that many of the dissent voices in soviet Russia were sent to the gulag or psych hospitals after being screened in a…"
5 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service