Just some insights anyone willing to share points of views.

Views: 456

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Lack of trust.

Not having a bond, if a marriage is held together by "things" that aren't each other. If a marriage is held together just for example the childrens sake, the mortgage, appearances etc. A marriage should be held together by each other, if everything was removed the couple should want to stay together.

Just my 2 cents.

A marriage isn't an entity that exists on its own.   It is entirely a product of the participants.  It is toxic if you're toxic; it won't be if you're not.  As for what constitutes a toxic spouse ... did you have anything more specific?

There are very few occasions where marital problems are one-sided.  If a marriage isn't working, there's probably something each spouse can do to push in the right direction.

JB

But one spouse cannot be the only one pushing; it takes two working together.  If you can't work together at the same time then it's over.

One of the main problems marriages have is that it is made up of two individuals.  When it gets to the point where any one individual cannot or will not look at things from the other individual's perspective then there is going to be problems.  When it gets to that point things will start becoming a tit-for-tat battle.  "Well he/she did this so I'll do that".

To start fixing the marriage you have to both agree to forgive and not bring up the past.  This is one of the hardest things to do especially when arguing.

Take the biggest problem (one or maybe two) the hot button thing and work on that first, ignore the rest while you work on those; again this is hard as it is not (really) just one or two things but a whole slew of things that have built up over time.  Once you get that thing down work on the next 'hot button issue' but don't forget the previous issue(s).  But, again, you both have to agree to this in writing with signatures.

 

BUT, what do I know, I'm having difficulties in my marriage so take it for what it's worth.

I disagree, with a few exceptions.  One spouse can very often change the entire tone of the marriage ... generally, by visibly and intentionally putting their spouse before themselves, by giving the wife/husband what she/he needs even if you're not getting it back.  By sacrificing rather than struggling.  It ain't easy in a toxic environment ... but, it can right the ship.

 

Like I said, there are exceptions.  But, most people who think they're an exception, haven't tried it ... and probably aren't.

 

JB

Thank you for your input and sincerity.

I'll back that up, having experienced some very difficult times in my marriage.  Thanks to some dedicated communication from both of us, it's better now than it's been in years.

Hey Rick
Just because there are problems doesn't mean you haven't hit the nail on the head with your post. It's so easy to have problems in a marriage, but so tough to find solutions that give enough satisfaction to two people to be workable. Speaking from my own experience. Obviously this is why it is so critical to choose a good spouse, but given enough time and a few poor decisions, even the best marriage can turn into the proverbial hot mess.

A toxic marriage is one that harms, rather than aids, the well-being of the spouses and/or their children.

I very much agree with this definition.  Dysfunctional is not the same a toxic.  There are some situations that you can "live with", but a toxic situation is one that is actively destroying the participant.

One that involves contempt.  That's also a doomed marriage.

Lol..

RSS

Latest Activity

David Xtra replied to David Xtra's discussion A "Holster" for a Phablet? in the group Man Bags
"That looks pretty close to what I was thinking. Hey, I could be Clint Eastwood :~) Homeland security would be kinda disappointed to find my phone hanging out in a holster. I'm not so sure about leather tucked under an armpit. Anyone here wear a…"
6 minutes ago
Carl Monster commented on thehuhman's group Men Over 50
"I hope turning 50 will be as awesome for you men as it was for me. 51, here I come, lol."
15 minutes ago
David Xtra replied to David Xtra's discussion A "Holster" for a Phablet? in the group Man Bags
"Personally I would much rather watch the gecko than Flo. The gecko is funny at least. Flo is just "everywhere" to the point of obnoxious. What I don't like about Geico, is that it stands for Government Employees Insurance Company.…"
16 minutes ago
Carl Monster replied to Tim's discussion Male vanity.
"I see what you are saying about FB, but the gym, those mirrors are essential. Yes, checking form is important, but I use them for one more thing. To me the gym is more mind game than anything else, and visualization is an important part of that. In…"
21 minutes ago
Curtis replied to Tim's discussion Male vanity.
"Lol!"
23 minutes ago
Carl Monster replied to Wolf & Iron's discussion New to the boards. Long time fan of Manliness!
"I totally get your desire, and yes, those images really support the site character.  Glad you took the critique positively, establishing a unique identity online when so much has been "done" already, is very difficult, and a manly…"
29 minutes ago
Wolf & Iron replied to Derick Cummins's discussion Looking for ideas . . .
"I agree that working on something is critical. Part of growing in manliness is feeling accepted into the world of men (you). Also, I would try to point to the manliness of Christ. There is an old book by Thomas Hughes from 1887 called The Manliness…"
35 minutes ago
Wolf & Iron replied to Wolf & Iron's discussion New to the boards. Long time fan of Manliness!
"Thanks Carl and I definitely accept the feedback! I certainly don't want to be AoM and try to stand out as much as I can while still being in the same vein of ideas. The things that differentiate Wolf and Iron from AoM will likely present…"
42 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service