Just some insights anyone willing to share points of views.

Views: 448

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Lack of trust.

Not having a bond, if a marriage is held together by "things" that aren't each other. If a marriage is held together just for example the childrens sake, the mortgage, appearances etc. A marriage should be held together by each other, if everything was removed the couple should want to stay together.

Just my 2 cents.

A marriage isn't an entity that exists on its own.   It is entirely a product of the participants.  It is toxic if you're toxic; it won't be if you're not.  As for what constitutes a toxic spouse ... did you have anything more specific?

There are very few occasions where marital problems are one-sided.  If a marriage isn't working, there's probably something each spouse can do to push in the right direction.

JB

But one spouse cannot be the only one pushing; it takes two working together.  If you can't work together at the same time then it's over.

One of the main problems marriages have is that it is made up of two individuals.  When it gets to the point where any one individual cannot or will not look at things from the other individual's perspective then there is going to be problems.  When it gets to that point things will start becoming a tit-for-tat battle.  "Well he/she did this so I'll do that".

To start fixing the marriage you have to both agree to forgive and not bring up the past.  This is one of the hardest things to do especially when arguing.

Take the biggest problem (one or maybe two) the hot button thing and work on that first, ignore the rest while you work on those; again this is hard as it is not (really) just one or two things but a whole slew of things that have built up over time.  Once you get that thing down work on the next 'hot button issue' but don't forget the previous issue(s).  But, again, you both have to agree to this in writing with signatures.

 

BUT, what do I know, I'm having difficulties in my marriage so take it for what it's worth.

I disagree, with a few exceptions.  One spouse can very often change the entire tone of the marriage ... generally, by visibly and intentionally putting their spouse before themselves, by giving the wife/husband what she/he needs even if you're not getting it back.  By sacrificing rather than struggling.  It ain't easy in a toxic environment ... but, it can right the ship.

 

Like I said, there are exceptions.  But, most people who think they're an exception, haven't tried it ... and probably aren't.

 

JB

Thank you for your input and sincerity.

I'll back that up, having experienced some very difficult times in my marriage.  Thanks to some dedicated communication from both of us, it's better now than it's been in years.

Hey Rick
Just because there are problems doesn't mean you haven't hit the nail on the head with your post. It's so easy to have problems in a marriage, but so tough to find solutions that give enough satisfaction to two people to be workable. Speaking from my own experience. Obviously this is why it is so critical to choose a good spouse, but given enough time and a few poor decisions, even the best marriage can turn into the proverbial hot mess.

A toxic marriage is one that harms, rather than aids, the well-being of the spouses and/or their children.

I very much agree with this definition.  Dysfunctional is not the same a toxic.  There are some situations that you can "live with", but a toxic situation is one that is actively destroying the participant.

One that involves contempt.  That's also a doomed marriage.

Lol..

RSS

Latest Activity

Jaya Jagannath replied to Jaya Jagannath's discussion Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
"Shane @ so you believe that you actually landed on moon right ? but what is the evidence ? did you seen this moon landing with your  own eyes ? or who has seen this so called moon landing with his own eyes ? on `1 else has seen bogus moon…"
3 minutes ago
Jaya Jagannath replied to Jaya Jagannath's discussion Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
"The same example. Just like computer machine. you do not find that the machine is made by a brain which is different from this material. But you are trying to find out a brain from this. This is your childish thinking. The brain is different from…"
13 minutes ago
Jaya Jagannath replied to Jaya Jagannath's discussion Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
"i don't what ? rascal dog im still waiting for your answer ? that If everything is pleasure, then why you take the counteractive process ( in sex life ) ? Why do you want to kill child? Pleasure? Why do you take contraceptive method if it is…"
18 minutes ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to Jaya Jagannath's discussion Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
"This is too easy. Let's see what Jim does when we replace his coffee with Folgers. "
21 minutes ago
Jaya Jagannath replied to Jaya Jagannath's discussion Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
"Man is known by his company." If your best friend is dog, then what you are? We can understand your position. Because you sleep with dog, you eat with dog, your best friend is dog, so what you are? you are nothing but an street dog who is…"
45 minutes ago
Jaya Jagannath replied to Jaya Jagannath's discussion Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
"i already know it that you are all shameless street dogs and your western civilization is soul killing civilization or suicidal civilization. so you do not know how right ? so simply answer to my this question that If everything is pleasure, then…"
1 hour ago
Jaya Jagannath replied to Jaya Jagannath's discussion Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
"once again you are imposing your personal nonsense without explaining anything at all. just look at the fun of your rascaldom. you are nothing but street dog."
1 hour ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to John Muir's discussion A Time To Kill in the group The Great Debate
"Lube"
2 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service