Has any of you ever used "no homo" after a sentence, or thought about using it?

For the record, "no homo" does not indicate any kind of homophobia. It simply means, "I realize that what I just said might have a gay subtext, but don't worry; I wasn't implying anything of a homosexual nature."

Examples:

  • Dude, you look good in those khakis. No homo.
  • I'm glad I saw that musical last night. No homo.
  • Pass the hot dogs. No homo.

By the way, I'm not suggesting that non-gay men necessarily should or should not use this phrase; I just want to get a read on who does. Your thoughts?

Tags: conversation, homo, no

Views: 4106

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

i have never heard nor read this phrase before.

and i think it is utterly unnecessary.

I think it's stupid...

Never heard it before.  I expect it's readily punctured with a snigger and "Yeah, whatever you say."

Never heard of it.  Sounds stupid.  If people think you're gay because of random crap like that, "no homo" ain't going to change their mind.


JB

I think the phrase is unnecessary. I would hope your friends know you.

It's a joke guys my age say, usually after saying something very homoerotic. It sounds dumb if you are srsbsns about it.  

Regardless of its intention, it is a term derived from derogatory slang for gay people. Additionally, it is also implying that we cannot say things of an apparently effeminate nature without being associated with homosexuality while simultaneously implying we do not want to be considered a homosexual while saying these apparently socially unacceptable male phrases. Completely ridiculous phrase.

2nd. Well said.

Perhaps generational; never heard it used except here.
At my age I don't give a crap about what another guy would think about my sexual orientation.

Agreed. Unless someone is asking me out on a date, I really don't give damn what they think.  If I make an off the cuff comment and somebody misconstrues they can either man up and ask me to clarify or pound sand.

Now that was a funny post !

This link is hilarious!!

RSS

Latest Activity

Regular Joe replied to Chu Kim's discussion You Are All Figments of My Imagination
""Can you make anything appear by just wishing, " Noetic sceiences seem to think so. ;)"
25 minutes ago
Kit the Odd replied to Chu Kim's discussion You Are All Figments of My Imagination
"Depending on religious tradition you may add:   Moses, the rest of the city of Enoch, and 3 Nephites.   And even those might be assumed to either have gone through a death & ressurection event, or will in the future."
27 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Regular Joe's discussion Woman is thrown out of Paris opera after cast refused to perform unless she removed Muslim veil in the group The Great Debate
41 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to David F.'s discussion Pew Research on Trust of News Orgs. in the group The Great Debate
"Interesting since, a while ago, someone had posted up some research indicating that people who lean conservative are usually more fearful than people who lean the other way. "
42 minutes ago
Rick S replied to Larry's discussion Re: "those who have gotten their first letter from the AARP" in the group Men Over 50
"I once subscribed to Newsweek magazine, and used my cat's name instead of my own.  My cat got a letter asking him to join AARP. I think they buy mailing lists from anyplace they can."
1 hour ago
Rick S updated their profile
1 hour ago
Leto Atreides II replied to Upside down bloke's discussion Nature of relationships
"Priceless."
1 hour ago
Will replied to David F.'s discussion Pew Research on Trust of News Orgs. in the group The Great Debate
"So this exaggerates what we already saw in the original graph:  liberals trust media outlets way more (24) than do conservatives (5). And I'm almost ready to shell out for a WSJ online subscription.  I'm not quite there yet."
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service