When is the right time to get involved with a significant other's family?  I've often bounced back and forth on the spectrum of involvement when it comes to past girlfriends.  With my current gf of almost two years, as of this thanksgiving I am now feeling too close of comfort.

I've learned, in the past, that you can get too involved with their family and lose your objectivity on the relationship.

Scale 0 ( You block them on Facebook from even seeing your profile pic and then meet them at the wedding.)

 to 10:  You move into an apartment with her male relatives, become a wolf pack and forget you even have a gf.

What do you think?

Tags: boyfriends, family, friends, gf, girlfriends, husbands, in, in-laws, law, parents, More…space, wives

Views: 138

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

In a marriage or relationship headed towards marriage, the primary relationship is with the romantic partner. You have a relationship with your partner's friends and family through your partner. If your partner has a close, healthy, helpful relationship with her family, you will be helpful and somewhat close with them. If your partner has a distant, unhealthy, or unhelpful relationship, part of the romance will be creating a good relationship apart from the troublesome "family of origin."

I can't put these concepts on your scale. Maybe if I add another factor. If your partner has a +8 degree relationship with her family, your relationship to them should be +7 or +6. [It'll never be as close as she is to them.] If your partner has a negative relationship with her family, you should try to be neutral towards them.

You didn't like my definition of 10?!

*shrug*

Your scale just doesn't in itself have room for the most important consideration.

I've been asked to be the neutral go-between between my husband and my in-laws. I knew better. Even if I could be neutral, I shouldn't be. My job is to choose my husband, always. And to avoid situations where I'm forced to choose between him and anything else.

RSS

Latest Activity

Regular Joe replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"Correct. But most people associate history with memorizing names and dates. "
6 minutes ago
Will replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"What's going on here, Joe?  That's the second time today you've understood me to endorse an opinion I was explicitly rejecting."
9 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"'Why?' and 'how' are always more important -- and more interesting -- than 'who, what, where?' JB"
9 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
""I think we are still taught myth.  Instead of "this is the destiny of a nation:  to bring democracy and freedom to the world by example,"" That's taught in history classes in the US? "
12 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Vytautas's discussion What Do We Learn From History?
"" "WE'RE ALL THE SAME, CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSITY!!!"" It also begs the question: If we're all the same, how can it be diversity?  "
18 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to East London Gent's discussion Business Trip Anxiety
"Everyone wins!"
25 minutes ago
Tim replied to Kevin's discussion Abercrombie advertising in the group The Shirtless Man
"Yes, I think this is disturbing too but it is not a new phenomenon as it is already happening in advertising geared towards women and girls (e.g. Victoria Secret). More exposed flesh, more $$! Note that in many of these ads, photoshop is often used…"
25 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Christian's discussion 20 year old looking for advice from you "white collar" gents.....is the money worth it?
"First, there are two sides to the wealth-building equation.  Income is one.  Outgo is the other.  With intelligent personal finance, you can build a solid mountain of wealth on much less income than you'd think. …"
25 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service