When is the right time to get involved with a significant other's family?  I've often bounced back and forth on the spectrum of involvement when it comes to past girlfriends.  With my current gf of almost two years, as of this thanksgiving I am now feeling too close of comfort.

I've learned, in the past, that you can get too involved with their family and lose your objectivity on the relationship.

Scale 0 ( You block them on Facebook from even seeing your profile pic and then meet them at the wedding.)

 to 10:  You move into an apartment with her male relatives, become a wolf pack and forget you even have a gf.

What do you think?

Tags: boyfriends, family, friends, gf, girlfriends, husbands, in, in-laws, law, parents, More…space, wives

Views: 139

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

In a marriage or relationship headed towards marriage, the primary relationship is with the romantic partner. You have a relationship with your partner's friends and family through your partner. If your partner has a close, healthy, helpful relationship with her family, you will be helpful and somewhat close with them. If your partner has a distant, unhealthy, or unhelpful relationship, part of the romance will be creating a good relationship apart from the troublesome "family of origin."

I can't put these concepts on your scale. Maybe if I add another factor. If your partner has a +8 degree relationship with her family, your relationship to them should be +7 or +6. [It'll never be as close as she is to them.] If your partner has a negative relationship with her family, you should try to be neutral towards them.

You didn't like my definition of 10?!

*shrug*

Your scale just doesn't in itself have room for the most important consideration.

I've been asked to be the neutral go-between between my husband and my in-laws. I knew better. Even if I could be neutral, I shouldn't be. My job is to choose my husband, always. And to avoid situations where I'm forced to choose between him and anything else.

RSS

Latest Activity

Jack Bauer replied to James!'s discussion Amnesty Intl petition against rape as punishment.
""Who will not wear the ribbon!?!" JB"
8 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Specs's discussion Yep... I shave the old fashioned way.
"I use an obsidian blade I knap myself."
13 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to James!'s discussion Amnesty Intl petition against rape as punishment.
"Meh. The equivalent of a wristband. If what India does bugs you enough to do something, do something substantive. If you're not moved to action, just admit it. I'm not moved to action."
21 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"Civilian gun classes.  It was Liam's analogy anyway.  Heh. You seem to be confusing 'feelings' with 'thoughts' or 'beliefs'.  Sloppy speakers often use the words interchangeably, causing confusion…"
23 minutes ago
Paul H replied to Specs's discussion Yep... I shave the old fashioned way.
"I have a Muhle R89. Love it! For my blades, I only use Personna Platinum. I tried a few different ones and I found the only ones that didn't irritate my skin were the Personna's. I use a badger hair shaving brush. No particular attachment…"
56 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"I took military level gun classes that solely went over the use of weapons. I took them over how to assemble them, how to tear them down for cleaning. I took them over proper shooting. We were watched over as we practiced shooting. We were graded…"
1 hour ago
Liam Strain replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
" And there's the morality - the top stuff is all very valuable, even without the latter. I think they can be separated. "
1 hour ago
James! replied to Sir's discussion Things that can't convince in the group The Great Debate
"Never underestimate ignorance. I know a person who was converted by being introduced to Pascal's Wager. Also a Baptist preacher once tried explaining away dinosaur bones to me and my friends by trying to convince us that they were…"
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service