Men, I am in a bind of sorts.

I own a 1977 Corvette. Great shape, runs well. That is the good-

The bad is that i dont drive it but a few times a year, i dont have a Garage so it stays far away from me in a storage unit. I have to pay for storage and insurance blah blah.

So the issue is- i have something worth a little bit of money that i almost never use. There are certainly other things i could do with that money (like buy a motorcycle). Not sure if i should hang onto it and wait until i have some time and money to put into it or just sell it and get a new toy i can use more often.

Keep or sell.

Views: 307

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

sell.

Much more trouble than its worth.  Sell.

JB

"Toys" tend to sell easier and for more in the spring and early summer if you can hold onto it that long.  On the other hand, a motorcycle might be cheaper now. 

Do you have pictures to post here? 

Not a bad looking car at all.  L-48 or L-82?

48... so only has about 180 HP although it has more torque than the 84

No bites ?
Sell it. Surely that storage unit is costing a few bucks. Just make sure to quickly spend the money on a more useful toy before someone tries to make you spend it on someone more practical.
My father has a classic Buick that he stores at a museum that is insured with the building , before that it was at an auto parts store on display , you might find something similar .

Shortly after this i thought a bit about what to do with it. Decided i should actually move rather than sell it. I need a garage, every man does. i like to do woodworking and there is just no room in my townhome, or the back porch to be specific. Moving closer to my work, getting out of the city, get a yard and a garage. sounds good to me.

 

I think if it was more readily available i would get more use out of it.

 

haha so rather than selling a car i dont use i decided to move to a new house. Shows some attachment i guess.

RSS

Latest Activity

Sir replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"Yes."
25 minutes ago
Sir replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"Yes."
25 minutes ago
Shane replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"Yes"
5 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"You're looking at this wrong.  This is the test phase.  Not only is failure an option ... failure may be the best option.  Couple of reasons for that mindset. First, neither of you know each other at all.  You're still…"
5 hours ago
Daniel replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
""Do they let men know when they are ready to meet his work callouses?" -Is this a euphemism?"
5 hours ago
QuackXP replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"Take it from someone who though that the only way my life could be complete is if I meet someone, get married, have kids, etc, etc, etc. If your putting all this pressure of the rest of your life in the first date you are doomed to fail. The first…"
6 hours ago
Carl Monster replied to Steve Dallas's discussion Corporate Stupidity
" Liquid nirvana. Dry, dry, and oh so cold. One usually suffices."
7 hours ago
David F. replied to Hesse's discussion First date: success not optional but mandatory
"Well said "
8 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service