"Sad, my first preference in a better sipping brand that is under $50 would be Bulleit. Not sure on the prices of Willet, Hancock's President's Reserve or Prichards Double Barrel. If I am not drinking one of those 4 I will be mixing which…"
This is what Prada thinks we should dress like, apparently.
Found this on another message board I frequent. Behold Prada's Men's Fall 2012 lineup.
Your thoughts, gentlemen? At first I curled my lip, then I noticed that there are no neckties in there. I quite like the idea of a future without neckties.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Chris C. on
-
Steampunk and pseudo-goth. Not my scene, but I suppose some of the younger guys could pull it off. Of course, I'd laugh at them, but hey, my dad's generation probably laughed at my parachute pants and hypercolor T-shirts (I don't know why, I'm SURE I looked cool!).
-
Permalink Reply by KermitKebab on -
Quite.
-
Permalink Reply by Jack Bauer on -
Looks interesting. Wouldn't wear any of it ... but I'm more impressed than I thought I'd be. Might just be because Gary Oldman is a badass.
JB
-
Permalink Reply by Chuck Knight on -
Fabulous, but totally inappropriate for daily wear outside of an office situation. And the smoking jacket? Beautiful. I wonder what they'll call it, though, since smoking is out of fashion?
But why do they all look so unhappy...and is it just me, or do they all look like Dr. Lovelace, ready to hunt down Special Agents Jim West and Artemis Gordon?
-
Permalink Reply by Mike Wisbrock on -
+1, Chuck!
-
Permalink Reply by Rebekah on -
High-fashion models are usually posed and pose unhappy/straight-faced/angry. The best reason I know of is it puts the focus on the clothes. Don't want people associating the clothes with only a certain mood/emotion. Even when the clothes are wedding dresses, the models don't smile.
I also read recently that models are concentrating hard. I can believe this, as it's as much the model's job as the photographer's to make sure the model's chin is at the right angle not to cast an unattractive shadow, etc.
-
Permalink Reply by JonEdanger on -
Conrad/Martin, not Smith/Klein, of course.
-
Permalink Reply by Chuck Knight on
-
Like there was any doubt.
-
Permalink Reply by Mike Wisbrock on
-
Don't even mention that garbage
-
Permalink Reply by Karl Helweg on -
At least I could wear the 2012 outfits to a cowboy action shoot. Better than 2011: http://ascbs.blogspot.com/2011/03/man-whispers-prada-mens-fall-2011...
Latest Activity
Bill commented on Eric Sherwood's group Tennessee"I was born, raised, and still live in Memphis. I've been here for 57 years and don't see that changing any time soon.
"
Paul_of_TX replied to Nate Thallas's discussion Good bourbon on a budget"I will second the Wild Turkey 101 suggestion. This is what I keep in my bar and I look for good value and good quality when buying alcohol. You can buy something better but dollar for dollar the 101 is hard to beat."
David F. replied to Big Bad Moose's discussion Questions of Morality"The problem with N.U.T.S for me is the Un-alterable part.
I'm fine with having base guides and adhering to the guides during times of stress. I'm not fine with thinking that they will not change or need refinement.
I have a few rules…"
Leif Gunnar Selberg commented on Leif Gunnar Selberg's blog post should I help younger brother become smoker?"Hi guys ,
By proud smoker I mean that I don't hide the fact that I smoke and I know I am an addict but most of the times really enjoy smoking"
Carl Monster replied to Christian's discussion Favorite Manly Poems"Spring has sprung!
The grass has grizz!
I wondere where da birdies iz."
Jess Levens replied to Nate Thallas's discussion Good bourbon on a budget"Blanton's is $40-50
Woodford Reserve $40ish (My favorite)
Buffalo Trace is $25-30 (By far the best at this price point)
Rare Eagle is around $30 - Also really nice
Wild Turkey is around $20 (The 101 will destroy you if you're not…"
The Dutch Dastard replied to James Head's discussion Women, my curse!"Techera, would you please explain why you keep calling things 'cowardly'? I honestly don't get what you're getting at (as in, I really fail to understand to how what and why it is referring).
Also, you might be right a lot…"
© 2013 Created by Brett McKay.
Powered by
