What kind of things, if bought thoughtfully and is quality-made, can you purchase once and have your entire lifetime?

For example, I'm in the midst of buying a series of Saddleback Leather Co.'s bags and luggage.  I think they will last longer than me.

Any thoughts?

Views: 4318

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

A Buck knife.
Firearms
Sure we do. We just don't complain about having to register and pay for the licenses. ;)
Diamonds. Duh.

Thinking about the things in my apartment that are older than I am: Depending on how often you wear it, classically-styled, well-made formal wear. Jewelry generally. Flatware, especially silverware. High-quality furniture. Certain books. Fine china. Winter clothes. Photographs.

In addition to all these, at my parents' house, things older than or about as old as they are: Original artwork (most wasn't bought, though; ancestors created it). My grandparents' marriage license. (I guess they didn't buy that. How about their marriage license as a buy-once item?)
Everything.
Nothing.
Just depends on how well you take care of your stuff.
A razor and, possibly, badger hair brush

Shoe care valet
1. Razor. Either double-edge safety or straight.
2. Watch. Pocket or wrist. Mechanical or quartz.
3. Fountain pen. From a good manufacturer.
4. At least one good suit.
Good knives. Just bought a MercWorx Sniper Chili in S30V steel. I have no doubts that it will outlive me.
I second this...

KA BAR
My parents had several wedding gifts begin to fall apart at right about their 25th wedding anniversary. Their high-quality, high-carbon knives were among them.
Are you talking kitchen knives? I'm more discussing knives with a more...um...utilitarian/sinister purpose.
Kitchen knives, and it was just the constantly-used paring knife.

RSS

Latest Activity

R. Max replied to Pale Horse's discussion Things You Hate
"I didn't even realize that the term "chick" was considered offensive until I went to an evaluation, started talking about some celebrity woman that was anti-vaccines, called her a chick, did not go over well. At least I passed the…"
8 minutes ago
Gentleman Engineer replied to Brandon's discussion Over-dressing-- How inappropriate is this?
"Such would fail to exist as superior to that haberdashery of desire for aught but those activities likely to result in damage to such raiments."
12 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Ok.  I wasn't sure about that because the site I read said the delegates "may" list their supported candidate.  It was the "may" that hung me up. Good to know.  I should have dug a little deeper on that.."
16 minutes ago
Roughshod replied to Pale Horse's discussion Things You Hate
"With what I can only imagine to be tiny exceptions, being called "girl" does not offend women and it is not a subtle put down by men.  Women call each other "girl" all the time, e.g. "What's that girl doing?",…"
40 minutes ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Indiana isn't do or die for Trump. He can still pull 1237 without it. Cruz has no shot unless they hit 4-5 ballots. At that point, the GOP will have destroyed itself, so it doesn't matter."
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Things You Hate
"The lack of offense likely has more to do with you, than with the people you encounter."
3 hours ago
Carl Monster replied to Pale Horse's discussion Things You Hate
"Would you like it if I called you boy? I've seen grown men say things like "I'll have my girl type that for you." Or the "go see that girl at the counter". Both are women in their fifties. It's a subtle put down…"
3 hours ago
Sir replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Consulted the woman in my house:  showed her the pic.  She snorted.  One vote for "OMG this is dumb.""
4 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service