There are two radically different ways to make a positive change in your life, which one is better?

If your opinion is "it waries, depends on you" then of course the question is how to know which one is right for you?

Option 1 - Static Balance. Small, regulated positive changes, in the form of routine. To save money, stick to a realistic budget every month. To lose weight, stick to a calorie budget every day and a regular exercise regime - every Tuesday is a chest and legs day etc. Advantage: can be easier. Disadvantages: it is boring to have regular routines, to have every day or month like the other, to have this organization. Small, easy changes don't fulfill you with a sense of pride and challenge. And always something unforeseen happens that puts you out of the routine. 

Option 2: Dynamic Balance. Understanding that unforeseen events can upset any routine, don't have a routine, rather go all-in today and be OK with not doing it all in a month, then repeating it - go from one extreme to another, then your average will be in a good balance. Have a buy-nothing November then splurge in December. Overtrain like crazy for two weeks, then pursue some other interest for a week. Wanna lose weight, go crazy fast for two days, have a ridiculously restricted diet for a week, then accept your friends invitation to that all you can eat buffet. Advantage: going crazy gives you fulfillment and challenge, it is a fun game, and you are prepared for unforeseen situation throwing you off track for a while, because your average is still OK. Disadvantage: can be hard.


What do you think?

Tags: balance, changes, diet, frugal, loss, spending, training, weight

Views: 259

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I usually found that the static option was, well, static. So I pushed hard. It worked for some things.

Option 3, surrender, "turning it over" as they say in AA, was sometimes the only way change happened.

My issue with the post is that things are more of a continuum, rather than a couple of discrete options.

I would hazard that a series of small, discrete, intended changes in one's lifestyle is not a "static" endeavor.

Similarly, a wild swing between extreme behaviors is not a balanced endeavor.

As to the initial OP question, you know what's right for you when it works for you, and works longer than a couple of days or weeks.

+1, although are you talking about losing weight specifically? Or are talking about positive changes in your life as a whole?

But, it really *does* depend on you.

 

Depending on your own mindset, either approach is equally valid.  The incremental changes are typically less painful and more palatable, but sometimes you just have to rip off the bandaid.

 

I've found, for me, a "break" with the old in favor of a new habit is often my best approach.

 

With regards to weight loss, I might have a suggestion.  There is an app called LoseIt! which I found awhile back.  Basically it's a calorie counting app, approximately analogous to the Weight Watchers system as I understand it.  It seems to be working for me, and I'm already down 6.4 pounds, without the pain of an abrupt change.  Maybe worth a look?

My wife and I actually practice a stance between option 1 and 2.  Based on Edward Deming's work.

We call it Focused Consumption.  We are focused on one area, currently weight loss and put extra resources on that until we find the method that works and then we lock it in, monitor and reward progress.  The rest of life stays like option 1 - Static.  It allows us to find the pride in the changes and make harder ones than "little shifts", yet smaller then an extreme all or nothing like option 2.

Once the method is locked down and the progress metered and rewarded, we can focus on the next topic, without loosing the gains from the first goal.

 

RSS

Latest Activity

Silviu Ilyevich Tulbya posted a discussion

An intricate college dating situation

Hello my fellow AoM members,I have come to a point in my life, as a senior in college, where I am frankly not interested in being a child anymore and have arrived at the point where, simply put, serious intentions have been on my mind, both with regards to my career, my spiritual and personal-growth life, and my romantic life. I want to clarify that I am not desperate to be in a relationship. I have been in 1 relationship that lasted one month, and I learned many things from it; including to…See More
12 minutes ago
Nick H replied to Patrick H.'s discussion Rowing
"I rowed all through my teen years. Competing in both sliding seat and fixed seat competitions. It's a great sport. As for sliding seat (the kind you're probably referring to). It can take a lot of practice before you really get your…"
13 minutes ago
Jay D replied to Tom Baker's discussion Masculinities and social class
"Josh isnt your son and calling him " as useless as a dog with two dicks." doesnt sound like a approbriate teaching method. Would you like it if random strangers talk to your son that way if he is asking for the link to a article someone…"
1 hour ago
Dannie Gray joined James Machamer's group
Thumbnail

Freemasonry

A place where many good and worthy fellows can discuss all things Masonic.
1 hour ago
Brian S left a comment for Rusty Rogers
"Hey Rusty, welcome to AoM. Not sure where you are in the "Beard" cycle but am somewhere between a trimmed and a full beard here. I think I will aim for a full trimmed if all goes to plan. So far so good anyway! Don't know if you chat…"
3 hours ago
Ben updated their profile
4 hours ago
Herb Munson left a comment for James
"Hi there James. Welcome to The Great Debate!"
4 hours ago
Brian Splash replied to Andrew's discussion How do you take your coffee? I prefer it black with a slice of butter in it.
"I only have one a day in the morning at home , French press with one tea spoon of condensed milk ."
6 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service