How ought a woman to be treated? Differently than a man or in an equal fashion?

Some argue that men are above women in various ways or that a man ought to

have the final say in marital discussion. Should a woman open the door for a man

just as a man would for a woman? Should there be a strong divide between both

sexes for masculinity to be established in a man; e.g., if a man were to stay home

and tend to the children while the wife works or if the woman in a relationship be

the stronger or bolder person in character? Should we retain the old-fashioned

customs of bread-winning and getting the chair/door for the opposite sex or

should there be a level line of conduct between individuals? What are your thoughts?

- With Regards, J.S.

Views: 1186

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think women should have a right to vote and it would also be cool if they found their way into the workforce someday, but they should be kept from military service because emotional moodswings don't mix well with firearms.

Interesting views; I suppose women are already well-integrated into the workforce. I also read recently that "Women currently hold 4.6 percent of Fortune 500 CEO positions." This is interesting and worth noting, I suppose. Thank you for your post!

- Regards, J.S.

I think you missed the sarcasm.

I am often caught in the snare of sarcasm.

We can have a good laugh anyway. Haha.

- J.S.

Gender and how we view the roles and abilities of the different sexes are both socially constructed.

I am in agreement with you on the matter.

Do you believe these roles should be re-

constructed, de-constructed or are you

mostly indifferent?

- J.S. 

Gender and how we view the roles and abilities of the different sexes are both socially constructed.

 Really, dumbass? There is no functional difference between you and the women in your life in size, strength, stamina, temperament or disposition? 

  That answers a lot of things. 

There are differences, indeed, but the roles seem more socially constructed.

In regards to social evolution, I believe. I should add that I do not understand

the need for such insults within the realm of civil discussion, Mr. Denny.

I should add that I do not understand the need for such insults within the realm of civil discussion, Mr. Denny.

There is a long history there, James. Vytautus and I have a mutually shared contempt for one another.

In a world of baby formula and white collar jobs, once a child is not the smallest of infants, those biologically determined roles mean much less. Dad's can be stay at home caregivers, mothers can be primary breadwinners...

Also, not everyone has children. Gender is bigger than the roles of parents.

If you are using aspects of child rearing/parenting to determine "roles" it makes a difference.

And again - we are not saying those roles are not rooted in biology. But now, in modern first world countries - nobody is running around with spears. And even breastfeeding is seen by many as optional. So the biological role, is no longer as relevant. Leaving us with the social as the primary determinant.

If the reasons for the original "design" are no longer a factor (white collar vs. hunting/gathering, etc.) - then holding up the original design as "the way it should be" is flawed. Roles change to meet needs, not visa versa.

If the reasons for the original "design" are no longer a factor (white collar vs. hunting/gathering, etc.) - then holding up the original design as "the way it should be" is flawed. Roles change to meet needs, not visa versa.

 

Roles have changed, but not instincts.  By your logic, an infant should not have the sucking instinct because, since the advent of formula,  breastfeeding is now unnecessary.

 

Just because our technology has rendered the original reasons moot, it does not follow that the hard-wired neural pathways responsible for instinct have changed.

RSS

Latest Activity

blackjack posted a discussion

recommend a book

A lot of people ask me which book is my most favorite one, and I always proudly answer them “The Five Thousand Years History”, which is all history about China. This will be a long story for me to read this book. First time I touched this book is when I was 5 years old. My mother bought it to me as my 5-years-old gift. This is a really wonderful present to me,which is opening a history gate to me , a totally innocent boy. I almost forgot the dinner after I read the first page. From then on, I…See More
10 minutes ago
Nick H replied to Sir's discussion The cotton ceiling and other subtleties in the group The Great Debate
"This is an older post but reminds me of when I lived in Montreal for a summer. After it I've decided female beauty has no race. I saw hot women of all races on the streets of that town."
2 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Vendetta's discussion Passive Income
"Youtube channels take a crap ton of work actually if you want more than pocket change."
6 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Vendetta's discussion Passive Income
"Yeah the only thing I can think of that needs almost no work is capital gains."
6 hours ago
Gentleman Engineer replied to Vendetta's discussion Passive Income
"Quite. That income of a manner of rent may qualify in the event that minimal effort would be of requirement."
7 hours ago
Sir replied to Vendetta's discussion Passive Income
"I'm no expert.  But is any of this really passive?  Got a blog?  People won't come if you don't post.  Store?  You need new products now and then."
7 hours ago
Trevor Corey replied to Vendetta's discussion Passive Income
"There's so many ways to acquire passive income: Youtube channel, blog, or even renting out property... First off, what are your key strengths? Are you a good writer? etc Work off that."
7 hours ago
Trevor Corey updated their profile
7 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service