Brett,

With regards to Provide, Protect, and Procreate, a tough question. What about those of us, after many years of trying, cannot have children. Health is the reason, and ongoing health issues disqualify us from adoption. Any advice on what to replace the 3P with to create the balanced identity you speak of? see

Views: 271

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Volunteer work with a childrens' charity. 

Donate sperm?

Some couples can't have kids, simple fact of life. Doesn't make either of you lesser human beings  IMO.

Some couples can knock out kids by the dozen and they are shitty, worthless parents, whacking out a few small people isn't everything. Don't beat yourselves up over this, be the best people you can be, and live your lives as good decent folk.

No need to replace the procreation part with anything...just be good, honest, decent people!

Agreed. 

However, If you still feel that absolute need to work with some form of "procreation" why not start coaching little leagues? I know that almost every little league, be it football, baseball, basketball, rugby, golf, tennis, bowling, chess, etc. are always asking for and needing more volunteers for coaching.

Isn't it more trying to accomplish the 3Ps that really counts?

If childbearing and adoption are both out of the question, but you want children around, you can foster.  It's needed.  Supposedly it's rough.

If you can't do that either, well, the world needs parents, but it needs lots of other things too.  What else are you drawn to, qualified for, good at, or called to?

Replace "procreate" with "parent" (as  verb rather than a noun) and the 3 Ps still stand for people who are unable to procreate but wind up adopting, being foster parents, being a de factor surrogate parent in various forms (big Brothers / Sisters, mentor to kids, active community member involved in kids' programs, etc.).

You can think of procreate in a more abstract way: to leave a little piece of ourselves, hopefully our best part, for someone else to pick up, use, and enjoy, so that when you are gone there are those who will miss, but also be glad that you were around in the first place..  Theodore Geisel was physically childless, but, on the other hand, as Doctor Seuss he had many children, some of the best I ever read.   If you cannot procreate, then at least create and find your joy in that.

You need to boil this thing down to the basic principles, and work from there.  Once you cut away the trappings ... "provide and protect" is merely a statement that men are better when they're responsible for more than themselves.  Self-sufficiency is the baseline.  Responsibility for others is the goal.  "Procreation" is about leaving a mark when you're gone.  Making the world better because you were in it.

 

Raising good kids is one way to accomplish those.  There are plenty of others, though.  You can provide for, and protect, more than just your own kids.  And, you can leave a mark in other ways.  Start a business that serves a need, makes a difference, and provides for the people involved ... for instance.  Put your money, heart and soul into a charity of some sort.  Go on a church missions trip.


You may have to think a little outside the box ... but not all that far.


JB

I would say that it isn't too much of a stretch to say that all of the aforementioned things create the conditions under which procreation is desirable so while he might not be procreating kids of his own, he's contributing towards procreation within his community. I'd say that's a pretty important role to play. 

Do you have nieces and nephews that are close to you (physically)?  Oh hell, I just thought of something that will suffice.  Volunteer at a Children's Hospital, join a men's group that takes on projects that help kids, sign up as a teacher at your church's Sunday School, make yourself available as a mentor for young men at your church.

My thanks to all of you. I think all I've read touches upon what Regular Joe said, change "procreation" to "parenting". Parenting, raising children to be citizens of this world, doesn't necessarily require giving birth to a child. I never saw how being an uncle, a god-parent, and a Sunday school teacher in my place of worship, could improve my sense of male honor. I understand that now.

RSS

Latest Activity

Will replied to Leto Atreides II's discussion Sony pulls The Interview Christmas Release in the group The Great Debate
"Love the humor of this idea from the WSJ: US government: buy the movie from Sony. Distribute it free on the Internet. Dubbed in Korean. Drop DVDs of it, and maybe The Interview:  A Celebration!  booklets by plane all over…"
25 minutes ago
Will replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"Peggy Noonan on this: let Castro die seeing US tourists with their smartphones taking pics of the ruins he made of Cuba.  Bringing capitalism to Cuba does not "legitimize" (per Rubio)…"
32 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to John Muir's discussion Oil in the group The Great Debate
"Only by economists who can't actually run a profitable business.It's a demonstrable fact of everyday life."
40 minutes ago
Will replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"I won't say I know the fix, but it's strange that the remedy for an illegal search is to disallow the evidence, rather than to prosecute whoever did the illegal act.  I am definitely all for limiting government power -- it has so much…"
46 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Christian Schmidt's discussion Let's Have A Spoiled Christmas
"It's an espresso machine manufactured by faema, you ignorant dolt. Kinda like your love of Lexus, when in truth Lexus is just a toyota with upgraded interior options."
49 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Christian Schmidt's discussion The Word "Manly" Is A Burden
"Heard a recipie on Cigar Dave today for chipotle and bacon fudge. There is a way to manup anything."
59 minutes ago
Jay D replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"Still, what to do with cases were the policeman cant be sure? "
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"The annotated law book sitting in their front seat?"
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service