How do you gents discuss past relationships with your current girlfriend / wife / partner? How much is necessary? What's ill-advised, and what's helpful for both people? Any advice on how to broach such conversations would be really helpful.

Views: 303

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm for historical honesty with a romantic partner, especially if you expect the relationship to be long term.

 

Though, full down-and-dirty details aren't absolutely needed.

 

I dated Jenny for 3 years, we slept together.

 

Done.

 

Not; Man, Jenny was a FREAK. I used to do her doggy... and MAN, the stuff she could do with her TONGUE! OH MY GOD! I used to eat Jello out of her butt crack. It was CRAZY! Then we did coke this one time!

 

 

Short and simple.

I don't want to know anything about my girlfriend's past. I know she had a boyfriend before me but that's all. I don't know if she had any sexual partners in college, I don't know how many guys she's kissed - nothing. And I don't want to know. The thought of it really makes me jealous and angry. I've even asked her not to talk about her past. Plus, she doesn't like hearing about mine despite it being shorter than hers.

If you are worried about STD stuff, just ask the woman to get tested. If she cares, she will do it. Don't be bashful about it - being responsible is nothing to be ashamed about. I've done it and am glad I did it.

Less is more, in this case.

Note, if I get to the point of a life long commitment, I may ask about this stuff if I didn't already find out. But I really don't know since I've never gotten there. It can be nice knowing everything about the person you love but somethings may be better off never knowing. It's a toss up.

You discuss what is relevant to the present. Regarding STIs, that may or may not involve discussing past relationships. You could just get tested, as has been suggested. Or you could discuss just enough about past relationships to satisfy each other you don't need to get tested. I'd say err on the side of relationship confidentiality and testing, so if one partner wants to talk, and the other wants to get tested, you should get tested and not press for a history.

Regarding relationship issues, my relationships before my husband shaped the person he met. They taught be about myself and what I wanted in a spouse. Lots of these things are personality issues that would have been very hard to explain without just stating my experience. For example, I don't think that punctuality or tracking finances are generally moral matters, but they were things I had to have in my life to feel what's commonly called happy. Other people (such as my husband) may learn such things about themselves in other ways, or be able to express them without giving the history, but I couldn't.

Of course, the longer I'm with my husband, the less my past experiences matter, and the less we talk about them.

My wife knows about all of my relationships and I of hers.  Its not something we talk of much.  Sometimes it comes up but not as a comparison between her and any one of them.

 

Like the others, if asked, I talk about it with as much as is necessary but not the super details.

If she wants to share, she can, and they usually do, a little or too much.

We never talk about it.  Broad details -- I have dated before -- are enough.  Who wants to hear that sort of thing?  Knowing she's the only one now is all she cares about.

I answer questions as they arise, however I never bring up ex-girlfriends for any reason if I can avoid it.  I never ask her questions about her past relationship.  I see no good coming from that.  

RSS

Latest Activity

Native Son replied to Joshua's discussion Democratic presidential nomination in the group The Great Debate
"Bernie makes some noise.  But whoever runs simply must overcome the combination of MSM love and donor cash attaching itself to the name Clinton."
36 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Dallas, if Jesus Christ descended from the heavens and told you it was a baby, you wouldn't believe it. Your arguments are degenerating into something between insanity and an utter lack of cognitive, linear logic. Your standing in the shower…"
37 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"You're killing your own argument Dallas. Just because you say it, doesn't make it so. You just offered why you are wrong."
48 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"I am flat out telling you, for those who are on the other side of the argument, it has everything to do with all of it. Just because you, and Jack and anyone else say no, doesn't make it so."
51 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"False pretense. The support of children in need does not require government bureaucracy. That is a comically dumb notion."
58 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to David F.'s discussion When is it better to be morally correct knowing it causes a worse out come? (The failure of Abstinence only educations) in the group The Great Debate
"In Colorado they have been running a program on free birth control for the past 6 years.  The numbers on this are quite eye opening in my opinion. A quote: Between 2009 and 2015, "teen births dropped 40 percent, abortions fell 35…"
1 hour ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"To answer your unbelievably douche question directly, I'm a thousand times more comfortable providing for a child than murdering it. Basically the opposite of liberalism which operates on the idea that a less than ideal start to life…"
1 hour ago
Steve Dallas replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Cite it please. At best, I have found where science has given four unique definitions of life."
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service