How do you gents discuss past relationships with your current girlfriend / wife / partner? How much is necessary? What's ill-advised, and what's helpful for both people? Any advice on how to broach such conversations would be really helpful.

Views: 285

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm for historical honesty with a romantic partner, especially if you expect the relationship to be long term.

 

Though, full down-and-dirty details aren't absolutely needed.

 

I dated Jenny for 3 years, we slept together.

 

Done.

 

Not; Man, Jenny was a FREAK. I used to do her doggy... and MAN, the stuff she could do with her TONGUE! OH MY GOD! I used to eat Jello out of her butt crack. It was CRAZY! Then we did coke this one time!

 

 

Short and simple.

I don't want to know anything about my girlfriend's past. I know she had a boyfriend before me but that's all. I don't know if she had any sexual partners in college, I don't know how many guys she's kissed - nothing. And I don't want to know. The thought of it really makes me jealous and angry. I've even asked her not to talk about her past. Plus, she doesn't like hearing about mine despite it being shorter than hers.

If you are worried about STD stuff, just ask the woman to get tested. If she cares, she will do it. Don't be bashful about it - being responsible is nothing to be ashamed about. I've done it and am glad I did it.

Less is more, in this case.

Note, if I get to the point of a life long commitment, I may ask about this stuff if I didn't already find out. But I really don't know since I've never gotten there. It can be nice knowing everything about the person you love but somethings may be better off never knowing. It's a toss up.

You discuss what is relevant to the present. Regarding STIs, that may or may not involve discussing past relationships. You could just get tested, as has been suggested. Or you could discuss just enough about past relationships to satisfy each other you don't need to get tested. I'd say err on the side of relationship confidentiality and testing, so if one partner wants to talk, and the other wants to get tested, you should get tested and not press for a history.

Regarding relationship issues, my relationships before my husband shaped the person he met. They taught be about myself and what I wanted in a spouse. Lots of these things are personality issues that would have been very hard to explain without just stating my experience. For example, I don't think that punctuality or tracking finances are generally moral matters, but they were things I had to have in my life to feel what's commonly called happy. Other people (such as my husband) may learn such things about themselves in other ways, or be able to express them without giving the history, but I couldn't.

Of course, the longer I'm with my husband, the less my past experiences matter, and the less we talk about them.

My wife knows about all of my relationships and I of hers.  Its not something we talk of much.  Sometimes it comes up but not as a comparison between her and any one of them.

 

Like the others, if asked, I talk about it with as much as is necessary but not the super details.

If she wants to share, she can, and they usually do, a little or too much.

We never talk about it.  Broad details -- I have dated before -- are enough.  Who wants to hear that sort of thing?  Knowing she's the only one now is all she cares about.

I answer questions as they arise, however I never bring up ex-girlfriends for any reason if I can avoid it.  I never ask her questions about her past relationship.  I see no good coming from that.  

RSS

Latest Activity

Larry replied to Regular Joe's discussion To circumcise or not to circumcise . . .
"Thank you, Brett!"
4 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Regular Joe's discussion G-Spot Officially Declared A Myth
"Michael D. Grafenberg.  Heh. JB"
13 minutes ago
Rick Shelton commented on Josh Allen's photo
Thumbnail

Captain Lamat

"N. Vest, I was actually referring to the post by Josh "Your a strange old man" and his lack of skill in written English, which is odd as he is such a 'highborn' peer and all."
19 minutes ago
Carl Monster replied to Rafael's discussion Explain this anti-rape add to me, please
"Yup, Grizzly Man. Movie was hard to watch, as he was obviously mentally off.  Sad that lady didn't see it. "that bear was full of people!""
23 minutes ago
Jon Glueckstein replied to Daniel's discussion What is a cheap skill/trade to learn that is high in demand?
31 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to Nathanael's discussion Common-sense gun laws, what would they look like for you? in the group The Great Debate
"I agree this is an issue. Creating a mechanism for submission of sales that isn't a financial burden on the private seller - I don't know what form that would take. But I could certainly see either a subsidy to FFL's to cover the…"
31 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Titus Techera's discussion Mr. Tyson, the clown in the group The Great Debate
"What I got from this is that philosophy is better because the philosophers said so."
32 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Nathanael's discussion Common-sense gun laws, what would they look like for you? in the group The Great Debate
"Its amazing the lengths we'll go to avoid the issue when the 'issue' makes us uncomfortable.  Even conservatives.   At this point, the conservative position on gun violence seems to be 'more guns, less…"
33 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service