What do you think. is it manli to smoke.?

Views: 1232

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I guess it depends on what you're talking about.  I don't think it's manly at all to rely on a substance of any kind.  I'm a pipe and cigar smoker and I don't feel the least bit of addiction. That being said, I do think pipe and cigar smoking can be considered manly.  There's just something about the relaxation and contemplative mood it creates that does indeed seem manly.

Enjoying a cigar on occasion is manly.  Standing outside by yourself in 20-degree weather because you need a cigarette is pathetic.

 

JB

Black tar lungs aside, nothing sexier than a man who can hold a cig with distinction:

I hate to admit it but it really is. There was a time when it was considered taboo for women to smoke because the cigarette is the symbol of a penis

Whereas if a man did it, it was manly?

Really?  If that's true ... its bizarre.  I've never heard the "symbol of a penis" theory.  You'd figure it'd be less stereotypically manly, and distinctly more womanly, to have a penis-symbol hanging from your mouth ... particularly in that day-and-age.

 

I'm sure I've seen pictures of fairly well-renown, and admired, women of the 30-60s smoking ... Marylin Monroe, Audrey Hepburn, Rita Hayworth, Marlene Deitrich, Bette Davis, Lauren Bacall, Lucille Ball (who smoked on I Love Lucy, during a time when married couples couldn't share a bed on TV, and the word 'pregnant' was banned), etc., etc.

 

It couldn't have been all that taboo.  Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.


JB

It was longer ago than that, though the sentiment did persist through those decades (and even to today, to some degree, I imagine).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torches_of_Freedom#Smoking_as_an_inapp...

And I think it's safe to say that Alexei didn't mean that smoking a cigarette literally symbolizes sucking on a penis. In my opinion it's easy enough to see it the same way a big gun might be a phallic symbol in a movie (or real life). 

The wiki page is exactly what I was talking about. Thanks for the link for everyone to see. 

 Ask yourself this: If I smoke, do I have more of a manly character then if I do not? You will have your answer.

Note: This does not mean, "do I look more like a man with a cigarette in my mouth?"

"Manly" also refers to activities befitting a man's man.  Stuff men do, not necessarily just things that make them men.  Its certainly not limited to "character building", or even character-revealing ... so long as it isn't revealing a flaw (like nicotine addiction, for instance).

Steak doesn't build character, either.  Or bacon.  Or cowboy boots.  Or pick-up trucks.  Or guns.  Or war movies.  Or any of a thousand other stereotypically "manly" things.


JB

 I realize that. I was just focusing more on the idea of character, rather then activities that men often partake in and find and interest in doing.

 Since, as you said, a lot of stereotypically manly things have nothing to do with building a manly character. (and if they have an influence it is rather unrelated to the thing itself, rather then what it teaches, and what it teaches is up to how it is used and percieved)

There is nothing unmanly in enjoying smoking every so often, it just isn't something that defines a man.

Smoking a pipe is definitely manly.  Smoking a cigarette is definitely not.

RSS

Latest Activity

crandles commented on Stephen Larsen's group Banya Men!
"Hi. I'm going to be in Rome and Paris soon Does anyone of some nice baths/saunas in either. In Paris I've only ever been to the one at mosque but that is closed now."
11 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Sir's discussion How far apart we are in the group The Great Debate
"Free speech has gone from freedom to speak to requirement to be heard to borderline crimethink. Interesting, you're right. It used to be skewed to "I can say what I want anywhere I want and you can't stop me." Now in colleges…"
11 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"In which case? I you mean Terry v. Ohio, there is still a "reasonable suspicion" barrier to overcome. We've already agreed that's a different situation than how "Stop and Frisk" has been implemented in NYC."
14 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Sir's discussion How far apart we are in the group The Great Debate
"I do feel Obama has been handed a raw deal.  I know many will disagree with me on this, but congress said outright they would fight him on every move he made, good or bad.  That's a raw deal.  It's brought our government to…"
17 minutes ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion How far apart we are in the group The Great Debate
"We've been divided politically. All the sorting taking place since JFK has been building to a head. The regressive left has gone insane. Media is no longer a watchdog against big government, but a collaborator. Entire industries are set up to…"
24 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Sir's discussion How far apart we are in the group The Great Debate
"I think most of us here are a different breed. Because if you can't articulate and substantiate your claims you will be made a fool, there is a certain level of accountability in the posts. Everyone here can respect those with other views, as…"
29 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Sir's discussion How far apart we are in the group The Great Debate
"I always liked when Colbert started the Colbert Report and had the word Truthiness. Both sides are guilty of it. We see our truths, regardless of facts.  Facts, like math, like stat, don't lie, but if you don't ask the right questions…"
34 minutes ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"SCOTUS doesn't agree with you."
34 minutes ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service