In light of our recent Return of Kings article, I thought it might be interesting to see what's coming from the other extreme.  Courtesy of "The Good Men Project" -- a site run by women, wherein women write helpful articles about how men ought to be ...


Does Redshirting Boys Help Them Succeed Academically?


Her theory is that all boys should be held back a year in school.  Because boys are immature.  And girls aren't.  Which makes school challenging for boys.  Even smart boys.  And, apparently, "challenging" is a bad thing for these poor fragile boys.  They just can't keep up.  Here are a couple of pull quotes ...


Typically boys mature more slowly than girls and redshirting a boy will give him a year more of maturity to help him with his studies.

Whenever I’m asked whether or not to hold a child back, I always answer a resounding “yes.” I firmly believe that holding a child back helps the child to grow socially and intellectually giving the child added confidence to assist him with learning.

For instance, when you are teaching a child to read it is so important that the child have confidence with reading while learning. If a child struggles while learning, he loses confidence with reading. Little confidence leads to a child disliking to read. When a child dislikes reading, he does not like to learn to read. When teaching a child to read, it should come easy to the child. If a child is not ready to read intellectually, he will struggle and the downward spiral of self confidence and disliking reading begins. For this reason, I think it is always better to allow a child to grow more and become more reading ready, and ready for other kindergarten activities.


But, lest you think that a "gifted" boy who can already read should study alongside the average (or even below-average) girls ... think again.  Even if he's brilliant, he's still just an emotionally-stunted boy ...


What if it is clear the child is ready to read? I still believe the child should wait to enter school. In fact, I encouraged a child to wait for entering kindergarten even though he was already reading and understanding at a high school level. In this case the child was clearly gifted and would be throughout his years of schooling. I wanted the child to be able to emotionally and socially handle his giftedness.


This article rather pisses me off.  We're literally discussing using sex differences to justify intentionally setting boys a year behind for the entirety of their lives -- from kindergarten, to graduation, to employment, to financial independence, to job competition with same-age girls, to earning-years before retirement.  Just ridiculous.



Views: 1099

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Their intra-mural sports teams usually do better that way, too. 

Boosting scores by stunting students seems fairly irresponsible.  There's no way I'd send my kid to a school like that.


You guys still learn cursive?

I recently found out that they stopped teaching it up here a few years ago.

I really don't understand why it's being taken out. So many modern and utilitarian demagogues think it's useless and impractical, but I say it's the height of written language. We were able to move from merely crunching a bunch of crude sound symbols together, to actually linking them in an aesthetically appealing way. To me, learning cursive is no less important to the mastery of the written language than puns and double entendres are to mastering the spoken language--We don't often use it in practical language, but it represents a higher command.

What more contemporary practices (like typing or just computer use) would you omit to keep it in? or would you lengthen the school day?

For real? What the heck do they do for seven hours??

Teachers are often very jealous of classroom time.  It's certainly a limited resource.  Like an administrative assistant with increasing responsibilities, we may be able to pile on instruction requirements to a point, but not infinitely.

I went to a private Christian school for a few years, and I started learning cursive in kindergarten, and could go to town with it by second grade. So could most of the kids. I wasn't held back, and only a few were, so that's not really a sure fire sign. I never heard of schools doing that. Interesting tactic.

Are you trying to make us laugh or cry. why are you quoting anything from "that" site?

If "that"site said the sky was blue ....... i would have to say i must have been wrong on the color all these years .

"You just made the case for unisex education"

unisex: designed to be suitable for both sexes

I feel like an idiot. I've been seeing references to "The Good Men Project" here for quite some time. I always thought it was an AoM group, just another one of the many. But it's a site run by women? I'm going to have to check it now.

As to your question: no, absolutely not. I have a son. He's 16 now, but I would've been very upset if he'd been held back a year. And it's been challenging over the years, too, but I've been there for him. It's really only been in the last couple of years that he's gotten more serious about his studies. Better late than never. Still, I wish he'd read more. I mean on his own time, as opposed to a homework assignment. The kid lives for video gaming. 


Latest Activity

Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"His history is extremely one sided. He completely ignores the fact that 4.5 slave states remained in the Union, 4.5 left the Union only after the attack on Fort Sumter, the same economic warfare England had used on the American colonies the North…"
18 minutes ago
Dominic replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"I think the thing about when neo-confederates pull out the "ordinary soldier didn't fight for slavery" argument is that few, if any, ever cite actual soldiers' words in support of this argument. Surely there are CSA soldier…"
24 minutes ago
Paul H replied to Peter O'Reilly's discussion Fasting and Intermittant Fasting
"Worth checking out Dr Rhonda Patricks episodes on The Joe Rogan Experience too. She talks about this on some of them."
25 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"You could be right. We just don't know what these folks were told when they were being recruited. Some may have been told, yes, this war is about slavery, but it's also about...Personally I think all this, is good for our country.…"
36 minutes ago
Dominic replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Even if a monument "commemorates those that gave their lives", it is commemorating those that gave their lives in the service of a political regime whose primary goal was enslavement of blacks, regardless of how those individual soldiers…"
41 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Braeden's discussion Trump's Afghanistan Declaration in the group The Great Debate
"I think the fact that he's taking his cues from those that are fighting, is a good sign. The timing, might be to distract from all of this. Trump needs a win with those of us that are just trying to figure out what the hell he's doing, and…"
42 minutes ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Thanks. And that's an understandable position."
45 minutes ago
Shane replied to Portnoy's discussion History in the group The Great Debate
"Muir gave a good summary of where some of the memorials came from."
46 minutes ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service