I am interested in any ratio people have noticed either in college or work experience. What is the general ratio between reading and writing for example for a particular research report. For every three hours you read is there one hour of writing you are able to gleen from what you have read?

Views: 118

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Depends on what you do, the purpose for which you're writing, and how well you know what you're talking about.  As you learn more, it takes less research to get your bearings and make your point.

 

I'm an attorney.  I don't write many "research reports" anymore.  For the most part, I write more than I research.  For the occasional wild-goose-chase motion or brief, I'll have to research longer than I write -- but that doesn't happen all that often.  Writing is production.  Research is overhead.  I try to reduce the latter as much as I can.

 

I imagine a history writer, for instance, might answer differently.

 

JB

I work with lots of different types of data and I practically never write anything like a paper one does in school. I do have to do "research" sometimes like when I had to understand geodetics and how a datum and projections work together. My end product is information supplied to the correct individuals that is loaded into a program or all summed up in a spreadsheet.

RSS

Latest Activity

CSil replied to Dietrich Adonis's discussion The Manly Tradition of the Pocket Notebook
"I carry the tried and true Field Notes book in my left back pocket. I did just switch my edc pen to one of those small space pens shown in the OP.  While I love my fountain pen the smaller space pen is easier to carry around"
1 hour ago
David R. replied to David R.'s discussion How women dress
"Something occurred to me: I was in high school in the '60s, when mini-skirts were being introduced.  My father thought they were scandalous and so distracting!  "How can a [heterosexual] man stay focused on anything when…"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Cruz spoke by invitation of Trump."
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"You guys and your rabbit trails and redherrings. Why are you arguing over a bullshit statistic?"
3 hours ago
John Boy replied to leadership's discussion How can a man know that he has achieved manhood and earned the title of man?
"In the words of the Westminster Catechism, "Man's chief and highest end is to glorify God and fully to enjoy Him forever." As long as we are still living on this earth and continuing to sin then we are not glorifying God as we ought,…"
3 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"So you would agree that a father should be paid less than a childless man? Afterall - 52% of men still showed up on that research as "having a job and family is difficult." Does "it's difficult" mean that they necessarily…"
7 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"It shows that women have a harder time holding a job while raising a family than men do. fwiw, my original statement that you quoted used intentionally general terms, to make it about mothers compared to non-mothers, instead of mothers compared to…"
7 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to Sir's discussion US Presidential primaries in the group The Great Debate
"Doesn't really answer the question I asked. But interesting nonetheless. "
7 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service