I am interested in any ratio people have noticed either in college or work experience. What is the general ratio between reading and writing for example for a particular research report. For every three hours you read is there one hour of writing you are able to gleen from what you have read?

Views: 98

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's hard to say, but my guess is your number is reasonable.

It really depends. You can't put a specific ratio on it and then follow that ratio and expect to be successful. You have to read as much as is necessary to accomplish the task at hand. If you're doing thorough research, you might read three or four books on a given topic, plus a half dozen articles. You might get three or four pages from your research, you might get ten or twelve.

I really don't recommend trying to put a mathematical ratio on it. That will not be useful.

Same as the above said, it's a pretty variable number. If you're doing an analysis on some article another person wrote, you probably won't have to read much beyond the article in question before you can write about it. On the other hand, if you're compiling a report on the history of steam engines in Wisconsin manufacturing, you're probably going to read a lot more than you write in order to get all your facts straight.

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Oil in the group The Great Debate
"That's because we can see what happens when we force democracy on the world. It turns to shit pretty quick. And since we're not parochial like the Brits, we tend to hope for the best. And well, you can see how democracy works out in most…"
8 minutes ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"The fuck it can't. It's absolutely expected of the perpetrator."
20 minutes ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"No. Cops operate in black and white. Officer discretion has been effectively litigated out of existence. Having been on the other side of those lights I can assure you I have witnessed plenty of people get arrested and ten the cop spending half the…"
21 minutes ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"Too lazy to read it?"
26 minutes ago
Jay D replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"You should work on your manners. If someone opens a discussion he is resbonsible to present it in a way that is overseeable. Instead he created a thread and out of laziness put zero effort in doing it in a way that would actually lead to a…"
37 minutes ago
Josh100LuBu replied to Christian Schmidt's discussion Let's Have A Spoiled Christmas
"It's a Faema. End of discussion."
58 minutes ago
Jay D replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"Ah, i already was prepared to rant how the US do undermine theit 4th amendment rights more nad more, but i have to say i dont see a problem with that decision. It´s not that he didnt know the law, he didnt know the law word by word including…"
1 hour ago
Vytautas replied to John Muir's discussion Oil in the group The Great Debate
"I mean, I get that the arial font is offensive, but I didn't know it had military power."
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service