I am interested in any ratio people have noticed either in college or work experience. What is the general ratio between reading and writing for example for a particular research report. For every three hours you read is there one hour of writing you are able to gleen from what you have read?

Views: 94

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's hard to say, but my guess is your number is reasonable.

It really depends. You can't put a specific ratio on it and then follow that ratio and expect to be successful. You have to read as much as is necessary to accomplish the task at hand. If you're doing thorough research, you might read three or four books on a given topic, plus a half dozen articles. You might get three or four pages from your research, you might get ten or twelve.

I really don't recommend trying to put a mathematical ratio on it. That will not be useful.

Same as the above said, it's a pretty variable number. If you're doing an analysis on some article another person wrote, you probably won't have to read much beyond the article in question before you can write about it. On the other hand, if you're compiling a report on the history of steam engines in Wisconsin manufacturing, you're probably going to read a lot more than you write in order to get all your facts straight.

RSS

Latest Activity

Profile IconPaul Spracklen, Aldebaran O. Moraes, jeff johnson and 8 more joined Art of Manliness
15 seconds ago
Andrew D, USA Ret replied to Jack Bauer's discussion Nevada Ranch War ... in the group The Great Debate
"5,000 Armed Militia Members Will Be Arriving In Nevada To Support Rancher  http://newswatch.us/5000-armed-militia-members-will-be-arriving-in-nevada-to-support-rancher/ I can recall nothing like that happening during my lifetime.…"
3 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Jack Bauer's discussion Nevada Ranch War ... in the group The Great Debate
"So is understanding facts one of the signs of being a pseudo-intellectual snob, while going with blind emotion a sign of a true American patriot? I am honestly confused, you claim you understand that what Shane is saying is true, but you side with…"
6 minutes ago
John C. replied to Josh Allen's discussion If you can tell me what religion you are then you are in a prison.
"Then I'm not concerned abou you Rick. My issues are obviously with others. Speaking of Catholics, the Vatican has usually been well versed on the science of the day. For example, they knew from their own observations that Galileo was right, but…"
6 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Jack Bauer's discussion Nevada Ranch War ... in the group The Great Debate
"Cowboy hat, gun and middle fingers? Shit, that is just about every asshole here in Texas, esp here in Houston, you are going to have to do better than that to win at 'Merica.  Hell, even us "elitist, intellectual snobs" who are…"
13 minutes ago
John C. replied to Josh Allen's discussion If you can tell me what religion you are then you are in a prison.
"http://www.concordatwatch.eu/topic-841.843 "In 1929 the long wait finally paid off when Mussolini proved willing to enter an alliance with the Vatican. A precondition of the negotiations was destruction of the parliamentary Catholic…"
13 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Josh Allen's discussion If you can tell me what religion you are then you are in a prison.
"Holy crap! Is that Internet Explorer?"
19 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Josh Allen's discussion If you can tell me what religion you are then you are in a prison.
"Ok, you are a child. When I was a child, I had thoughts such as yours. I would spend nights in arguments with the religious folks, trying so hard to prove to them that I was right, and so that they would see just how wrong they were.  I was…"
20 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service