Prostate Cancer Screening -- Necessary or Unnecessary?

I've always heard that the conventional wisdom was that when you turn 40, you should start planning to get a prostate cancer screening.

But my doctor told me today that the conventional wisdom may not be that wise.

I'm fortunate to have a physician that is a no-B.S. professional. He will tell me straight up what's up; he won't treat a patient who is not sick; and he is really skeptical of insurance and pharmaceutical companies to say the least. He's kept me and so many others healthy because of his attitude toward his practice and his patients. Needless to say I've learned to trust the guy with my well-being.

So when I told him I turned 40 recently and that I thought I should get a PSA test, he told me "not so fast" and pointed out to me that getting the test may lead to proper treatment and prevention, but it has just as much chance of leading to overtreatment and unnecessary complication.

My father once had prostate surgery, but my doctor says even if it's hereditary, it doesn't mean I'll be diagnosed with it. Indeed, as I've done my research I'm finding many in the medical community questioning the necessity of constant prostate screening.

I mean, I have no reason to think I may come down with prostate cancer, and if I take a test and they find something that might not even be cancer and take treatment then I may well suffer adverse effects.

On the other hand, if I take it and they do find something, I could either a) live with it and likely die 60 years from now of something else; b) take the treatment and save my life; or c) die of prostate cancer within the next five years.

The doctor's argument did sound reasonable, and he didn't tell me not to get the PSA, he just said I could choose to do it or not to and that it might not really make any difference long term if it don't. But at the same time, if I do, I run the risk of treatment that might be ultimately detrimental.

Those of you who have made the decision to get the screening, what motivated you to do so? Do you wish you hadn't? Do you think the screening made any difference? What might have happened if you chose not to?

Thanks.



Tags: Cancer, Prostate, Screening

Views: 120

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

My father's screening caught his very aggressive prostate cancer before it could kill him. Even though he had it removed, he still has a 50% chance of having it reoccur. It's worth the test.
I recommend this to everyone - go read the book Overtreated and then make the decision for yourself.

Topher is right - it's a screening test, though not a very good one. It produces a lot of false positives.

I am very involved in PCa work because of what happened to me.  (My understanding now is that African Americans should begin PSA tests at age 40 and other men at age 50.)

I had my first PSA as part of my annual physical when I turned 50, and it looked a little unusual.  So the next year I had it done again, and it looked even more unusual.  They did a biopsy followed by a more thorough digital rectal exam than before and found that I had cancer in my prostate.

Of all the options that were available to me I chose surgery, which I had done in 2000.  That makes me a 12-year cancer survivor.  Thank you, God!  (Contact me privately if you would like to know why I chose surgery over the other options.  And if you'd like to know how I overcame common post-prostatectomy side effects.)

I know that a PSA test is not perfect; no medical test is (as far as I know, as I am not a medical professional myself).  Any doctors worth their salt would follow a suspicious PSA with another one, and then do a variety of other tests before making a diagnosis and discussing options with the patient (and the options include active surveillance, aka watchful waiting).

No doctors worth their salt would say, "Oh, your PSA is [a certain number].  That means you have prostate cancer.  Let's do surgery/radiation/chemo/hormones."  A PSA number is not a magic tell-all finding.

All I know is that since prostate cancer does not have symptoms (until it has spread to the bones and then it's too late), PSA tests saved my life (and the lives of quite a few other men I know).  But of course what persons do with their own bodies is up to them.  A person's body is extremely personal, isn't it?

Screen, if you have it then assess the situation.  Some cancers are so slow as to not be a problem, some are not.  There is a concern about over treatment. 

Trust me on this.  You really need to keep the old body's systems checked.  It's analogous to checking the underhood fluids in your car.

Far, far better to discover that your enlarged prostate (yes, I am that old) is not due to an inoperable cancer.  The one you didn't get diagnosed because you didn't mind peeing half a dozen times a night.

You are wise (and fortunate to be able) to trust your personal physician, but the bottom line is that YOU are ultimately responsible for your health, not your doctor.  Sounds to me like he really cares about his patients.

Learn what the signs of prostate cancer are.  I'm not a doctor, and I don't put myself out there as one.  But 40 does appear to be too young.  Since your dad had it, you might be at increased risk, but your doctor is right: that doesn't mean you'll get it.  Still, know the signs.  Have anything suspicious checked out by a licensed physician.

RSS

Latest Activity

Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion After Chattanooga in the group The Great Debate
"Eritrean People's Liberation Front, fightin Ethiopian forces in the late 1980s for independence, were revolutionaries, not terrorists.   But if theyd set off bombs in Addis Abbaba, id call em terrorists. Custer's nemesis, and the…"
2 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Pale Horse's discussion After Chattanooga in the group The Great Debate
"Sounds about right. "
10 minutes ago
ClubmanPinaud replied to Thomas's discussion Cooking for one
"If you have a rice cooker I recommend beans and rice. Red kidney beans and brown rice is a great way to get fiber, protein and carbs to keep you going physically and digestively. Red kidney beans for some reason vary in protein content so check the…"
28 minutes ago
Mongoose posted a discussion
33 minutes ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Pale Horse's discussion After Chattanooga in the group The Great Debate
"If the enemy does it, it's terrorism. If we do it, it's gorilla warfare/spec ops/special tactics. Basically."
42 minutes ago
Regular Joe added a discussion to the group Christian Men
Thumbnail

The Crypto-Catholic Background of A Jamestown Leader

A Skeleton, a Catholic Relic, and a Mystery About American OriginsA newly discovered artifact buried with one of Jamestown’s most prominent leaders suggests he could have been a crypto-Catholic.The finding is a historical bombshell, unearthed in a grave on the site of what was once the first church built at Jamestown. Which means researchers may have just discovered proof of an underground community of Catholics—including Archer and perhaps the person who buried him with the relic—who pretended…See More
1 hour ago
Vendetta commented on Mongoose's status
1 hour ago
Mongoose posted a status
"Why does watermelon-flavored candy always taste sour when watermelon is not sour?"
3 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service