Hello everyone,

I'm writing this post to share with you all my strength training program and all of the different ways I train.

I love training, and have always loved it and will always love it. So yes, I am obsessed, and to many it may seem like too much, but it's really not.

We men have been created to be physically dominant and to use our bodies. 

The famous quote from Socrates: "No man has the right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training. What a disgrace it is for a man to grow old without ever seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable."

With that said, here is how I train:

I wake up early in the morning around 4:30AM. This is when I work on my business.

Throughout the day, I perform 100 push-ups, 100 bodyweight squats, and 100 sit-ups. I either do as many as I can in one go, or I split them up throughout the day, it depends on how I feel.

Around noon, I go to the gym which is a minute away from my house.

I do my heavy lifting routine, which you can find on my website. It's the best I've ever done and I said something in another post about how I train depending on how I feel. The program doesn't give you set percentages and numbers to do, because it doesn't treat you like a machine, the program let's you train your body according to how your body feels. Amazing.

And at night time, I go to my MMA gym. This is where I get all my conditioning and endurance work, and I learn how to kick ass (while also getting my ass kicked). 

I love MMA, it makes you feel things you never would've felt before and it really tests your limits.

So that's how I train. If you guys have any questions I'll be happy to answer them.

Views: 1077

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"We men have been created to be physically dominant..."

Aah, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

You know this is the 21st Century, right? It's not the 19th. And this is not Misogynists Anonymous - you don't get points for admitting that you're a fan of this sort of reactionary BS, and we're not here to help you get better.

Please, tell me more about how you're dominating and becoming a musclebound hulk. I could do with a laugh.

I was referring to our biological nature, which still holds true today.

Our biological nature is that of a malformed woman. That is the reality of our genetic code. We have a deformed chromosome which makes us a man. The idea that we are "dominant" is ridiculously antiquated thinking. We are different thanks to a massive genetic mutation, and it's not something that we should pretend makes us "dominant".

Clearly you are a frustrated old man. 

I was merely sharing how I train with those interested.

You can go live your life being a malformed woman, a genetic mutation, or both. Whatever suits your frustrated self. 

But I have to go train in mixed martial arts now, so I won't waste anymore of my time on your ignorance.

Maybe it's because he quotes Plato or Xenophon, or says he does, neither of whom considered male dominance as being physical dominance over women, but I read that as men striving to be dominant over men.

The 46th Y chromosome is smaller than the 45th or 46th X chromosomes, true.  But I wouldn't call it "deformed" or even a "mutation."  The human race obviously needs that chromosome.  And, historically, it's clear that the understanding of human health was based on a healthy male, not a healthy female.

My problem is with the idea that dominance is something that is attractive. To me it's repulsive. But if others are attracted by the idea of dominance, that's fine by me, as long as I'm free to giggle at the embarrassing immaturity of it.

as long as I'm free to giggle at the embarrassing immaturity of it.

I didn't realize this was a discussion about your penis.

Our biological nature is that of a malformed woman.

as long as I'm free to giggle

Hmmmm

Shane wins. 

Our biological nature is that of a malformed woman.

 

That's a fairly unique self-loathing.  I am woman-ish, hear me roar, eh?


JB

Well Ian, aren't you a weird little dude. 

 While the OPs' wording was a touch clumsy, he's fundamentally correct. There is nothing misogynistic about it, it just is what it is. Men and women are opposites, built for different roles and imbued with different biological advantages in order to fulfil different roles. It's not about one being any better than the other. It's about two pieces that form one whole. And while exceptions certainly exist owing to the complexities of human psychology, women do not respect in any authentic manner men who fail to take the lead. Nor does life in general. He who dares, wins. He who does not dare, works as a clock punching wage slave for some guy who did. Or the Government. Neither of which are particularly noble results. 

Thing is, OP didn't say anything about women. I'm fairly concerned with this current trend to be outraged against offenses which don't actual exist. Might as well label OP a racist while we're at it.

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"@Liam The complainant used the word racial profiling. So what? As I said, a judge removed for bias and a mayor who stopped the process doesn't get to overturn the SCOTUS decision. @Clinton We're back to things that make you feel icky.…"
24 seconds ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"The attacks that Hillary levied against Trump were not brought up by Holt.  The '76 Law Suit, his not paying contractors, his desire to see the housing market crash, his support of Iraq.  All of these were levied by Clinton when she…"
11 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Does it bother you that you spend so much more time and energy campaigning against Trump than Clinton? What's your endgame here? I'm certainly not a Trump apologist. But, the reality is, if he doesn't win ... she will. Whether…"
15 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"The moderator brought up taxes, etc. Trump had to contrive the Bernie discussion. Not equal."
19 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"There is nothing wrong with racial profiling."
20 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"You said in a statement earlier that Trump did bring up Bernie.  Clinton opened the door wide open for him when she brought up the DNC hack.  Trump was given softball after softball and he swung and missed.  He would rather talk about…"
22 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"No, I am calling you out for accepting that NBC is grossly biased and expecting Trump to play on their terms. Why do you think it is natural for Trump to be interrogated while Hillary gets softballs? Why do you think it is Trump's job to go…"
25 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Have you looked at the numbers on "Stop and Frisk" in NY Shane.  it's something like close to 90% of people that were found with nothing.  And again.  These numbers were in the hundreds of thousands of people stopped.…"
26 minutes ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service