Temperatures in the DC area have been pushing past 80 this past week, often with high humidity.  Summer in the swamp is beginning, bringing with it a sartorial dilemma, namely, balancing comfort, storage, and style. 

I tend to carry quite a bit on me.  At the minimum I'll have my wallet, phone, keys, and a pocket knife.  Usually I'll also have sunglasses, a handkerchief, a pocket watch, earbud headphones and, when I'm in Virginia, a 380 pistol with a spare clip.  When I'm wearing a jacket or coat there's little trouble, as the jacket plus my pants provide enough pockets.  The wide variety of jackets available makes it easy to dress up or down in combination with various shirts, pants, sweaters, etc...  The problem comes when the climate makes wearing a jacket miserable even when I do what I can with light-weight fabrics.  This makes it hard to dress well, because if I leave the jacket at home I lose most of my pockets, but if I keep it on I'm unhappy except in air conditioning.  This can be remedied by wearing cargo shorts or pants (and if I'm wearing cargo anything I might as well go all the way to shorts when it's summer), but that results in a more casual look than I often want when going out.  However, the jacket-less slacks + dress shirt + tie look doesn't work when every pocket is bulging.  Is there anything that will enable me to dress in that gap between cargo shorts and a jacket while also providing plenty of pocket space?  The solutions I'm aware of are to carry less stuff or put things in a separate bag; but I don't like doing either.  Nor does it help that I hate putting my wallet in a back pocket. 

Any suggestions?  Or will I have to choose between being overheated but dressy in a jacket or cooler but casual in cargo shorts?

Views: 975

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

@ Nick H.


I'm guessing by your post that you're not a "Gun Guy." Nothing wrong with that, to each his own, ya know?


In answer to your question about carrying extra ammo, there are a few reasons.  You are quite correct in that police officers are acountable for every shot they fire.  Infact, everyone who carries a gun is acountable for every bullet that leaves the barrel. 


Cops tend to carry larger, higher calliber firearms in 9mm, 40S&W, or 45ACP.  Those are some pretty big bullets, and the magazines tend to hold quite a few rounds, anywheres from 8 to 18.  The .380 that the OP is carrying is smaller and less powerfull than any of those.  It will also usually only hold about 6 bullets.  Keep in mind also, Police Officers also carry not just extra ammo, but an extra (or backup) gun. 


Furthermore, guns can jam for several reasons, and its not allways the guns fault.  Sometimes the magazine (clip) can prevent the gun from working.  If that happens, the only solution is to either draw another gun, or change the magazine.  its also possible that if an attacker gets to close and tries to gain control of the gun, the magazine could be inadvertantly released in the ensuing scuffle, and another magazine would need to be inserted. 


Thats probably more than anyone reading this ever wanted to know on the subject, so I'll just sum up my thoughts on it quite briefly.  If possible, I will de-escalate, avoid, and evade a situation rather than draw a gun.  If I draw my gun, things have already gone so unbelievably wrong, why should I expect good fortune in regards to the amount of ammo?


I have yet to meet someone who has been in a gunfight and wished that they had a smaller gun, or less amunition.


In a more general and widely aplicable sense, I believe that bad luck can be overcome by preparation.


Hope that answers your questions,

Chris Johnson

@ David F.


Obviously, there is nothing to worry about in Virginia.  If there was, the .380 would have been replaced by a .357 magnum a long time ago.........


Sorry, couldn't resist.

I never expected this thread to be subjected to such postmortem communication.  Since it's back though, I guess I'll address a couple points.


1.  On the extra ammo, Chris put it well.  My main carry gun has 6+1 rounds, for a total of 13 with a spare clip.  As these .380 rounds lack the stopping power of larger slugs, I prefer the extra clip.  As was noted, if something happens that's bad enough that I have to pull my gun and fire it, I want all the firepower I can get, including a few extra bullets.  This is especially pertinent in the summer, when I'm most likely to carry the smaller gun instead of a larger one (as I'm sure everyone who's been through a concealed carry class has heard, the best gun is the one that's with you when you need it).  For a further discussion of guns, concealed carry, self-defense, etc... I'd suggest the Great Debate.

2.  With summer ending, I suppose it isn't amiss to report what I did to bear the heat, which was a combination of most of the above at various points.  I wore lighter fabrics, left stuff at home, dressed down, wore a jacket with shorts and short-sleeved button-down (not as bad a look as it sounds), and sometimes just sucked it up and sweated more. 


Latest Activity

Penelope commented on Timothy Hyden's group Emergency Management-Disaster Preparedness
"Power out.  Used my cellphone to find candles and matches.  Used the candles to find the flashlights.  Dropped a battery getting a new flashlight up and running.  It's a good wake-up call as we head into El Nino."
2 hours ago
Brother Joseph replied to Sam K's discussion Good sources for political opinions?
"I really like the BBC not because they're totally non-partisan, but because they aren't here in America they tend to not care as much about taking sides. I agree with other comments though, the only real way to get what's really…"
3 hours ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"Sanders released his immigration proposals and its heavy on amnesty. You're wrong about socialized medicine and should stop taking a 15 year old statement out of context. As for taxing the rich, his progressive scheme is more fiscally…"
4 hours ago
Sir replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"We went thru that.  A soak-the-rich tax-and-spend advocate of socialized medicine is not a conservative.  Agreeing with Bernie Sanders on illegal immigration isn't enough."
4 hours ago
Shane replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"How is Trump not right wing?"
5 hours ago
Sir replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"Except for the "right-wing" part, yes."
5 hours ago
Sam K replied to John Muir's discussion Donald Trump Is A Greedy, Creepy, Ignorant Jerk in the group The Great Debate
"I'm not particularly fond of Trump; to me he's like a right-wing version of Bill Maher running for President, and I wouldn't be found of the idea of Bill Maher running the country even if I was on the left.To me though the least of my…"
6 hours ago
Sam K joined Herb Munson's group

The Great Debate

"Iron sharpens iron." A place for men to impact each other by debate and exchange of ideas. This is a group where no ideas are off limits. If your motto is, "I never talk about politics or religion," this group is probably not for you. A "gym" for thinkers.See More
6 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service