Perhaps FEMA should advocate preparedness for a fortnight?

I was listing to the BBC this morning and they where discussing the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.  The thought came to me that perhaps FEMA should advocate preparedness for 14 days or more.

Currently they just say you need 3 days of supplies.

What do my fellows think?

Views: 302

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ay-yup.

I live in walking distance of a store so I am set. I also feel much better now that Bush is no longer President because under his leadership surviving something like a hurricane would be terrible.

When the problem is overreliance on FEMA, maybe more FEMA declarations aren't the answer.  "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help."


JB

I agree with the your sentiment about over reliance on the government.  However it is an honest question do we need to stock pile 14 days or should it be more?

I guess the better question is when do we expect to be able to return to our lives after a disaster.

You didn't ask about preparedness.  You asked about FEMA advocacy about preparedness.  My point was those are two very different questions, and conflating the two doesn't help matters.  People look to FEMA to rescue them rather than preparing.  Making FEMA out to be some authority on the matter will make things worse, not better.

 

If a storm is headed your way, you should be prepared to be without power for at least a couple of weeks ... and expect no help from FEMA or the Red Cross or anyone else.  People need to learn to think for themselves, not to wait around for the government to tell them what to do.

 

JB

I agree with you completely.  I'm surprised that FEMA doe not make that more clear.  I was surprised the recommended preparedness level was just 3 days. 

Making FEMA out to be some authority on the matter will make things worse, not better.

I disagree with this. FEMA is the authority on the matter.  They are the ones, with organizations like Red Cross, who study disasters and disaster response.  If they come out with a gear list, that list will be authoritative.

We can live for more than 2 weeks without food. If you have enough water for 3 days you can ration it and stretch it out as much as possible. You can also recycle urine and other things through evaporation. If you have the ability to boil and or treat water you can usually find a source or use that to help with the recycling. I just don't see a need to have 14 days of supplies available. If you are prepared for 3 and you have a plan and some knowledge you can stretch that for a longer period of time if needed. The three days simply allows you time to think and assess the situation without panicking and have a clear head while deciding on what to do next.

I just don't see a need to have 14 days of supplies available.

 


I can go a month, easy, with just what I have in my house.  Without any preparedness.  How do you figure there's no need for half that?

I think we are pretty much on the same page. I don't think you need a separate cache to sustain yourself for 14 days in addition to what one has in their house.

And the city folk who are used to stopping by the grocer every day and aren't in the habit of keeping a stocked pantry?

You can talk all you want but I doubt you will get through to them. Those are the slow members of the herd and are meant to be picked off.

RSS

Latest Activity

Lucius Artorius Castus replied to Will's discussion The red pill
"http://community.artofmanliness.com/forum/topics/the-red-pill?commentId=2357106%3AComment%3A1787784 Notice that little squiggly thing at the end... it looks like this one >>> ? <<< That's called a "question mark".…"
30 minutes ago
Chuck Knight replied to Kneller's discussion business casual shoes for under $100?
"Check in the store. They don't carry a full selection of widths in every style, but wide widths are common."
1 hour ago
N. Vest replied to Will's discussion The red pill
"Are you imply that we shouldn't be judging them by their words? which is the only thing we have to judge them by.  If it looks like a bunch of "men" bitching about women what evidence do we have to think that it is anything else?"
1 hour ago
N. Vest replied to Pale Horse's discussion Study Shows Men With Inhuman Eating Habits Have Trouble Making More Humans in the group The Great Debate
"NSFL"
2 hours ago
N. Vest replied to Pale Horse's discussion Study Shows Men With Inhuman Eating Habits Have Trouble Making More Humans in the group The Great Debate
2 hours ago
Penelope replied to Vince's discussion college:problem with procrastination
"Study 2 or 3 subjects at a time, beginning about 45 days before the exam on each subject."
4 hours ago
Lucius Artorius Castus replied to Will's discussion The red pill
"Of course it's necessary. Even kings have court jesters."
5 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Nick's discussion Th lonely life of full-time pastors
"If the congregation doesn't think that pastors have their own problems, then that's an issue with the congregation, not the pastor. From what I gather, much loneliness for pastors comes from the problems created by being both close friend…"
5 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service