Perhaps FEMA should advocate preparedness for a fortnight?

I was listing to the BBC this morning and they where discussing the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.  The thought came to me that perhaps FEMA should advocate preparedness for 14 days or more.

Currently they just say you need 3 days of supplies.

What do my fellows think?

Views: 308

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ay-yup.

I live in walking distance of a store so I am set. I also feel much better now that Bush is no longer President because under his leadership surviving something like a hurricane would be terrible.

When the problem is overreliance on FEMA, maybe more FEMA declarations aren't the answer.  "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help."


JB

I agree with the your sentiment about over reliance on the government.  However it is an honest question do we need to stock pile 14 days or should it be more?

I guess the better question is when do we expect to be able to return to our lives after a disaster.

You didn't ask about preparedness.  You asked about FEMA advocacy about preparedness.  My point was those are two very different questions, and conflating the two doesn't help matters.  People look to FEMA to rescue them rather than preparing.  Making FEMA out to be some authority on the matter will make things worse, not better.

 

If a storm is headed your way, you should be prepared to be without power for at least a couple of weeks ... and expect no help from FEMA or the Red Cross or anyone else.  People need to learn to think for themselves, not to wait around for the government to tell them what to do.

 

JB

I agree with you completely.  I'm surprised that FEMA doe not make that more clear.  I was surprised the recommended preparedness level was just 3 days. 

Making FEMA out to be some authority on the matter will make things worse, not better.

I disagree with this. FEMA is the authority on the matter.  They are the ones, with organizations like Red Cross, who study disasters and disaster response.  If they come out with a gear list, that list will be authoritative.

We can live for more than 2 weeks without food. If you have enough water for 3 days you can ration it and stretch it out as much as possible. You can also recycle urine and other things through evaporation. If you have the ability to boil and or treat water you can usually find a source or use that to help with the recycling. I just don't see a need to have 14 days of supplies available. If you are prepared for 3 and you have a plan and some knowledge you can stretch that for a longer period of time if needed. The three days simply allows you time to think and assess the situation without panicking and have a clear head while deciding on what to do next.

I just don't see a need to have 14 days of supplies available.

 


I can go a month, easy, with just what I have in my house.  Without any preparedness.  How do you figure there's no need for half that?

I think we are pretty much on the same page. I don't think you need a separate cache to sustain yourself for 14 days in addition to what one has in their house.

And the city folk who are used to stopping by the grocer every day and aren't in the habit of keeping a stocked pantry?

You can talk all you want but I doubt you will get through to them. Those are the slow members of the herd and are meant to be picked off.

RSS

Latest Activity

John Muir replied to Steve Dallas's discussion First God.... in the group The Great Debate
"right you are, Will"
9 minutes ago
Will replied to Milo Morris's discussion Definitions in the group Out to Build Bridges
""Adult"?!  Another label!  I am offended!  :o"
14 minutes ago
Brown Fox commented on thehuhman's group Men Over 50
"My first colonoscopy, my sedation wore off just as they pulled out the scope-- Talk about a rude awakening!"
16 minutes ago
Jay D joined Ian Wilson's group
Thumbnail

Out to Build Bridges

This is a GSRM (Gender Sexual Romantic Minorities or LGBTQ+) group.  But And straight men and cis-men are encouraged to join as well.However, unlike the already established AoM group "Gay and Bisexual Men", this group is wide open, no privacy settings enabled.  The overall purpose of the group is to encourage conversations between the straight and non-straight communities.  This already happens in AoM, but it is scattered.  And it can't happen in the private "Gay and Bisexual Men" group.Debate…See More
20 minutes ago
Danny j pasichnyk replied to Milo Morris's discussion Definitions in the group Out to Build Bridges
"I prefer human. Labels are created by adults who need to categorize, criticize, marginalize, etc."
39 minutes ago
UrbaNick6 replied to Jake's discussion What are some clothing brands that are made to last?
"Not sure how relevant it is to overhauling a wardrobe, but Patagonia is a brand that I would recommend looking at. They have quality products that last and its a class act corporation. I'm saying this without owning any of their products, but I…"
43 minutes ago
Milo Morris replied to Milo Morris's discussion Definitions in the group Out to Build Bridges
"Yup. None of these factors--either alone, or in combination--is typically enough to make a person depressed enough to commit suicide. Yet the gay orthodoxy continues to lay the suicides of sexual minorities at the feet of "homophobia" in…"
1 hour ago
Vytautas replied to Pale Horse's discussion Called It in the group The Great Debate
"Because you voluntarily went out of your way to find pictures of a woman you consider unattractive, then proceeded to complain about how much she doesn't attract you, and not only that but society's ideal of beauty is completely wrong…"
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service