One thing that really pisses me off is getting up at 0500 walking to the coffee pot and finding that some nimwit has already made a pot of see through "coffee". Or theyve made some hazelnut or wintery frilly crap that will make all the pots for that day have a horrible after taste. What is your take on people making horrible coffee?

Views: 525

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

If they made it for themselves; then to each his own. If they offer me any I would decline. If it is a community coffee pot; then they should make regular strength, regular flavored, coffee. If an individual drinking from a community pot wants it flavored they can add flavor, if they want it weaker they can add water.

I completely agree. Its a community pot and almost all of us like strong black coffee. We have creamer and sugar. Theres like 5 guys who are from a different unit and they make the worst coffee ever haha. But im just pissed off today and mad at the world so im in hardcore complain mode haha.

Pour the pot into the tank and run it through the grounds again.

lmfao i just drank the rest of the weak pot and made a good one haha. People get pissed if we run it through twice (most pointless ass chewing ive ever gotten) The entire time i was like are you really fucking yelling at me for this haha

My take is that "horrible coffee" is redundant -- you could just say "coffee."

so wait. You dont like coffee and youre a member of the art of manlines.... Taliban.

 

Just kidding man, to each their own haha.

BLASPHEMY!!!

Agreed haha.

Agreed with Will

d;bbbbbb
I NEED my coffee to become human, otherwise I am walking undead.

Jarid,

Here's an solution from an Army Reserve facility I'm at regularly.The common pot contains the traditional black as sin good strong coffee.  The coffee fund bought a Keurig brewer.  Those who require hazelnut or whatever buy their "K-cups" and use the K machine.  Problem solved. 

we did that for a while but the Kuerig broke lol.

RSS

Latest Activity

Steve Dallas replied to Jack Brenner's discussion Interim Bill
"I f'n hate tipping so damn much"
5 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to David Johns's discussion Male insecurity?
"  It may not be entirely symmetric ... but its probably moreso than that makes it sound.  Pants are a unisex article of clothing.  Like t-shirts.  They make pants specifically for girls.  Dresses aren't at all…"
9 minutes ago
Lex Goretoy replied to Morgan Land's discussion Firearms for the unfamiliar
"YouTube University. You can find a lot of videos explaining safety, shooting technique, and how to properly clean a firearm after use."
10 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Jack Brenner's discussion Interim Bill
"Damn you can't even understand simple English.  I gave examples of why someone would do this, I didn't judge them based on some damn ass-upmtion I made about their situation, you all did.  If you can't tell the difference…"
26 minutes ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to Jack Brenner's discussion Interim Bill
"You've been speculating. You've been making all manner of assumptions. You've been making excuses for why someone would do this. Then you deride others for speculating and making assumptions. Can't have it both ways."
40 minutes ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to Jack Brenner's discussion Interim Bill
"This."
44 minutes ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to Jack Brenner's discussion Interim Bill
"<insert dragging this out further self-identification text here>"
45 minutes ago
Will replied to David Johns's discussion Male insecurity?
"It's not symmetric. A boy wearing a dress is a freak, but a girl wearing pants is, well, a girl. Same for makeup. Same for a backpack with Hot Pink Princess Barbie v. Transformers.  Although the girl might get a raised eyebrow on that…"
47 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service