There was an idea stuck on my head in this week. I went with some of my friends in the theater and we saw a movie. The movie was "Ana Karenina" inspired by the book of Leo Tolstoy. As the movie started I started to dislike it. The choice of the actors was awful. I want to speak for the main character Ana interpreted by Keira Knightley. She tried to emphasize the gestures of nobility of that time but she looked ridiculous. She was about to smile in an attractive way and what she does, a duck-face. It is not personal but just to introduce my idea. 

As I see today many books are ruined by these "post-modernism" movies To me that I have read plenty of books who are being today movies is a big delusion from the cinematography. They keep ruining books. I can't say that all movies are rubbish but those who makes millions of dollars of income aren't that satisfying. My friends I wanted to share my opinion and to know yours about these kind of abomination.   

Views: 139

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I remember seeing the first part of the film adaptation of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness.  The book was beautifully written, sending the reader into a deep, dark jungle, with strange things lurking about just beyond sight; terrible atrocities, lazy, depressing cruelty upon an undeserving people.  When Marlow spoke, I felt that I, too, was on the River Thames with him, listening to him in that darkness.

To say the film was a poor representation of the book is a vast understatement.

Yeah the same idea got stuck at my head. They spend a lot of money and work in a poor representation. 

In drama studies, one of the things they stress to both the actors and the playwrighting students is that the theatre of the imagination is always greater than anything that can be put on stage or screen, and it is essentially true.  One can always imagine things that are hindered by something in the material world.  That's why cinema and theatre are never as good as the book.

  Hello Bruno

  I'm not sure if you've seen the discussion we're having on the changes from book to movie in John Carter, but it's much along the lines of what you're talking about. It's not an identical subject because we're talking about recent film incarnations of pulp novels, but you might find it interesting.  I started it because of my frustration with the modernization and softening up the protagonist. Some of the responses had some great insight.

    At times though, modernization and anachronistic behavior is what some people want.  My darling wife for example, is a middle ages fan and loves the old Heath Ledger movie; A Knight's Tale.  It's not a bad flick, and it's anachronisms are intentional.  A much more fitting view of Knights in action however, was the movie Ironclad, which she didn't make it past the first few uses of that Zwiehander.   

  As Shields said above, the real flavor of any book is bound to be altered to introduce it to a wider film audience. It is, after all, a money making industry, and they are keeping the concerns of the average viewer (who probably hasn't read the associated book). Thus the "action" added to the Hobbit, and the songs and feasts taken out of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. They were popped in, or taken out to make would hopefullly be a better movie.   

   In short, some of us will always be dissapointed with certain incarnations of book to film translation.  We're at the mercy of the director and cast to bring our stories to life.  That being said, thanks for the warning about Karenina, Keira was the crush of my misspent youth, I wouldn't want the duckface to ruin her!

                                                             Sam

RSS

Latest Activity

Sir replied to Conor's discussion I need help moving on, it's been six weeks now.
"Journaling, counseling, reading relevant books, ManKind Project, Codependents Anonymous,  talking here or IRL, inner child work... if it's a big enough deal to merit it, try everything in sight til something works."
23 minutes ago
Wes McArthur replied to 2risewhenfallen's discussion Have you Worked in Companies/Industries with Massive Inefficiency?
"I cannot be certain, but I suspect the frustration I have felt in the criminal justice system is comparable. It is not only inefficient, but at times borders on the farcical."
2 hours ago
Wes McArthur replied to Kerim Oğuzcan Yenidünya's discussion Is to dwell on a subject manly?
"I concur with salt. If it's a traumatic event we are discussing, then I would say take the steps you need to put it behind you. In other words, if you cannot alter it then it's probably best to drive on...just my humble opinion."
2 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to David R.'s discussion "Iron sharpens iron" in the group The Great Debate
"What is Mic? I'm thinking of things like Richard Spencer replacing his Pepe emoji with a milk emoji.  I'm always inquisitive. "
2 hours ago
Conor replied to Conor's discussion I need help moving on, it's been six weeks now.
"Thank you, i feel a bit better now, i had a weekend away from everything and it made me feel better. As i said above i saw her when i went to town with another guy and it made me feel really bad at first and then i felt anger so when i ran into them…"
3 hours ago
Conor replied to Conor's discussion I need help moving on, it's been six weeks now.
"I know it's stupid and that i just make up excuses for her to justify her behaviour towards me, i know this in my mind but in my heart i just ignore it somehow... I actually went away this weekend to an old friend i haven't seen for a…"
3 hours ago
Conor replied to Conor's discussion I need help moving on, it's been six weeks now.
"Ah, okay. I will try to stay away from it all together to be honest."
3 hours ago
Conor replied to Conor's discussion I need help moving on, it's been six weeks now.
"And how do i focus on this, what can i do? I feel totally lost right now."
3 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service