We've all heard of misogyny, and I'm pretty sure most men here have heard of misandry. Do you see cases of this in the media? If so, feel free to post them here, and we can discuss if it's really misandry or if we're just being overly sensitive.

Views: 620

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Absolutely not. I'm pretty certain most men know what an encyclopedia is, on or offline. It's the reactionary trend of feminism, really. We had lots of misogynistic commercials for a long time, the stereotypical "woman in the kitchen" type of thing. Now, the media has swung the other way, with men in general, and dad's specifically, being mindless children who need a woman to keep them in line. Sad but true. Or as a pansy who is useful only when buying things for women, nothing more (see Zales, Kay, Hallmark).
We've had these discussions before. I actually think the pendulum has been swinging gradually back toward the center over the past few years. Sites like AoM attest to the fact that we're waking up to the realization that men aren't the bumbling morons that they were portrayed to be during "La Revolución."

Even in the worst cases, I rarely see a stupid father/husband anymore who isn't accompanied by an equally stupid mother/wife.
BTW, I was describing what AoM is (as well as what it isn't) to my parents last weekend (when they asked about my copy of the AoM book), and during my explanation, the word "misogyny" popped up. My mom wasn't familiar with the word.

Isn't it funny when women don't know things? Silly women. :)
That ad is pretty offensive.
I'd say it was a blend. There was definitely a generational thing between the dad and the daughter, but the wife was extremely condescending to the husband, practically treating him like one of her children. The sad thing was that the husband didn't even look offended or annoyed by the chastening; he just scampered off to obey.
yeah I go crazy when I see stuff like this. I have a hard time thinking of a TV sitcom dad who isn't either totally stupid or totally creepy. I think the role of the father/husband/man has been really pooped on by the media over the past 10-15 years. What's a society supposed to do when there are no positive role male models?
One that I find minorly offensive is the Yopait Light one. It's not as bad as some older ones, but it's the constant mild "thickheadedness" that bugs me. Even the AT&T "leftover minutes" dad is kinda that way, very passive, and a little slow.
I don't know; I actually like those AT&T commercials. It seems to be poking fun at all of our moms (and having sympathy for the rest of us) more than anything else.
yeah, the older ones were more "momzilla". Something about the newer dog-fetching one is just a little more anti-dad. Like i said, it's just annoying, not really offensive.
I don't think I've seen that one; I'll keep an eye out.
I've gone on about misandry for some time (note that although it's a real word, you'll get it underlined in red on most systems because they don't recognize it!). I subscribe to the RSS feed of Men's News Daily. Although there is a significant amount of political stuff there, you can also get plenty of illustrations of how male bashing is the "in" thing, about a biased justice system and all kinds of stuff. Also, I recommend reading the Weblog by Dr. Helen Smith, a forensic psychologist who detests male bashing. Here is one example from her.

One thing in advertising I don't get, the double standard. If they treated women like they treat men (stupid buffoons), they would lose business.

RSS

Latest Activity

Regular Joe replied to Titus Techera's discussion Another chance to talk about good & evil in the group The Great Debate
"Private life or public life? Both.  Is there any meaningful understanding of quality of life? There are several frameworks that define and measure quality of life using a variety of benchmarks. Some are quite detailed and scientific, like…"
8 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Will's discussion Moral relativism in the group The Great Debate
"I don't think people can make moral laws.  The problem, to me, isn't with the word "moral" ... people can make their own moral decisions.  The problem is with the word "law".  A law has to be…"
9 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Regular Joe's discussion Responsibility Towards A Brother
"I missed the part where you live in Canada. In that case and in any case I don't see what else you can do other than, maybe, talk to your parents and advise them to get him out of their house as Jack suggests.  If they are fine with him…"
11 minutes ago
Jack Bauer commented on Herb Munson's group The Great Debate
"The exceptions are to the definition of 'murder', not the rule itself.  The rule stands without exception.  There are killings that are not murder.  There are no murders that are moral."
17 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Regular Joe's discussion Responsibility Towards A Brother
"That's the nail that done got hit."
17 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Regular Joe's discussion Responsibility Towards A Brother
26 minutes ago
Anthony Evenden joined Dennis Leber's group
27 minutes ago
Will added a discussion to the group The Great Debate
Thumbnail

Moral relativism

I like to post my answers in a thread, to our topical discussions; so I'll put my thoughts here, and invite others to do the same.  The topic, I believe, is moral relativism.The part I want to comment on right now is Dallas's comment, "Why does a moral law giver have to be God?"  It's worth answering, at least partlyPeople can give moral laws without being God.  The question is, are they the right moral laws.  I say it's wrong to kill people for being Jewish, Herr Hitler said it was right --…See More
27 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service