Hi,

There's a fine line between reflection, and whining. Usually, when I put a more esoteric question up for such a discussion, I seek for advice, not to vent.

So, I am really good at what I do, at least most of the time. Now, I have found that I generally tend to work slower than I'd like to. Usually to good results, but I tend to put too much thoughts into things. I feel like this is something that inhibits me from being more productive. - Yet, and I am not sure how to phrase this in English, this slowness has become ingrained in my working habit. So, what do? How can I work fastre, yet preserve my diligence in my approach?

Thanks,

Rafe

Views: 80

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sounds like you need to do a couple of things.  First, focus on the large issue at hand, not the minutae of the process (unless that's your job).  Second, one thing I've found is that a lot of projects have common requirements, that are documented or done in the same way, for every project.  If your job requires written results, often setting up a "Pony" documents file in your word processor or other computer program will save you a ton of time on projects.  You do have to make sure your "ponies" are current, but they generally don't change too much or too often.

There is a difference between efficiency and effectiveness.  You can be as efficient as you want but if you're simply producing garbage then you're not very effective or usefull to your company.  Is this 'slowness' an issue for your supervisor?  Another way to look at it is if you're just producing what the boss wants (the Jone's account report let's say) with only the information he asked for then your evaluations will be 'average'.  Alternatively if you're producing the Jone's account report with future data or business producing information (the Jone's investment trends carried out to the next few years or so) would that be more effective and valuable to the company?  It would take a bit more time to produce and as long as you're not going over the time limit for the job but you improve your potential for advancement.

It might depend on the type of work.  You're meticulous.  Can you make your next challenge to be meticulous something like "work faster yet preserve diligence?"

You make me think of "motion study," which is the management practice of analyzing what actions you do to accomplish a task, and find a way to do the same task with less motion.  Things like "make a batch file and run it rather than type in the commands every time" and "move the raw materials and the table you're working on next to each other rather than making trips across the room."

RSS

Latest Activity

Will replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
""National campaign":  say more about what you'd hope for."
40 seconds ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"Well now it's a SCOTUS precedent."
3 minutes ago
Kluk J. replied to Belmin Bratic's discussion Manly figures of the modern culture
"I think that Roger Federer is a good example. He is not my favorite tennis player. But so far as I know, he seems to be a good husband and father, respects his opponents, excel in his job without showing off.  Okay, I know that in the end of…"
11 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
""only that it's okay to be a retard and wear a badge (paraphrase)" We all know that."
14 minutes ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"On a side note someone should pick this up and run with it. If our laws are so vague as to be unreasonable for even our enforcers to enforce, it might we worth a national campaign."
14 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"I will say that the wrong argument was made about this.  It shouldn't have been about the ignorance of the law, although that could be argued as well as the officer didn't intend to give a ticket.  Stupid DA on this one."
16 minutes ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse... in the group The Great Debate
"That wasn't the argument. You do understand you're not actually allowed to argue the case before the Supreme Court. Just as you're not allowed to argue constitutionality before a municipal or state court, right? This turned into a…"
16 minutes ago
Kluk J. replied to Andrew's discussion How do you take your coffee? I prefer it black with a slice of butter in it.
"Hot coffee, cold milk, no sugar. Or only black coffee and no sugar.Or those things of Starbucks and similar stores with funny names and a lot ingredients coffee,, chocolate, sugar, cream, chocolate, strawberry whatever... and usually I take the cold…"
18 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service