How many Mad Men fan's do we have on here? I really just started watching it this season. I think I may enjoy the time period more than the show though. Don't get me wrong, it's a great show but I think I'm drawn to it because it was in the days of real men.
I've saw a few episodes in the past, but like you this is the first season I've tuned in regularly. I think I am a bit disappointed in it and I agree that I like the time period and their attention to detail in recreating it more than I like the show. I think maybe it is because it is built up so much in reviews and ads, it couldn't live up to what I expected.
The entire show is a character sketch of Don Draper... to really appreciate it you need to watch from the beginning. This season (so far) is all about Don wanting to be a better man, husband, father.
If you haven't been following along with his personal struggle to get to this point, you probably wouldn't catch on to that.
I agree; this show needs to be watched from the beginning. I've only recently started watching it because of all the buzz. I made a commitment to watch from Season 1 Episode 1 and I just finished the latest episode (here's a great write up on Time's Jamie Poniewozik blog about it, which illustrates how deep this show's writing is.)
Like most of us, the time period attracts me more than the show's drama, a time where people not only behaved like men, but adults.
Try your local library for the first season (and maybe the second season). AMC showed the second season in a marathon, and I DVRed them. My girlfriend loves the show, and doesn't have cable, so I'm DVRing the third season for her, and I'm most of the way through the second season myself to catch up to her.
So far: you're right, it's mostly about Don Draper, who is a fascinating bundle of contradictions. Without spoilers, his life is based on an escalating series of lies from the innocuous to the heinous, and it's fascinating watching him juggle them all without coming across as utterly contemptible. The attention to the period, not merely in fashions but more importantly in mores, is breathtaking. People drink alcohol and smoke heavily at work, the divide between the private and the public self is much greater, women have significantly different roles, even at work, and the attitude about fidelity is that finely-honed hypocrisy of my parents' generation. The characters are deep, and constantly surprising. It is a bad move to write off any character on the show as superficial, as they all have surprises that make them more enriching to watch. I find the show very compelling.
I like the show. Not only does it feel, "real," but I also find Don to be a very interesting character. I wouldn't say that he isn't the only interesting character, though. His name escapes me right now, but the character who's co-head of accounting, the one who's wife is having trouble getting pregnant, seems to be a very interesting character. Also, the entire English take-over is pretty cool as well. You get to see the gentle men of the 60's from across the pond.
That being said, I'm a sucker for history, and shows that recreate that history, so I may have a huge bias here.
I absolutely adore this show. I love the characters, I love the themes, I love the subtext, I love the ambivalence, I love it all! The design is outstanding, paying attention to every detail. I don't watch it when it's on; I'd rather wait and get it on DVD so I can watch them all at a faster rate.
By the way, if anyone wants more Jon Hamm, he made an appearance on my favorite podcast a while back. The podcast is called Never Not Funny. It usually only stars comedians from the LA-scene, but they often have actors, musicians and even radio personalities on as well. Jon Hamm was on, and showed he's more than just a great actor and a handsome fella': he's funny to boot! It is a pay podcast, but if you are interested, you can probably track that episode down (I believe from season 3 of NNF) at Pardcast.com.
"" If I was to say the reason women were so weepy is because they're lost little girls who had their masculin carved from them. If I was to proclaim men the saviors of women. I'm pretty sure I'd get kicked in the nuts for it…"
"Sure would. But if you instead said that the only proper emotional expression was FEMALE stoicism -- that women are weepy because the patriarchy carved out their inner confidence -- and that men are to blame for it -- that is, if you were a…"