Hi all,

I'm wondering what your thoughts are regarding love in marriage (or relationships in general). Are you looking for "the one", for some ideal?

I have also seen the movie, The Wedding Planner, with J.Lo. It's a terrible movie, but there's a line in there that stuck with me. J.Lo's father (in the movie) said he married her mother in an arranged marriage and the two didn't like each other for they were in love with someone else each. But slowly, he developed an appreciate for her taking care of him when he was sick, that appreciation turned to respect, that respect turned to like, and that like turned to love so deep that he never thought possible.

What are your thoughts on this, especially to guys out here who are married? Did you marry your wives on the fairy tale-like love, a type of love from the movie above, or some other type?

Eugene

 

Views: 290

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I was taught that love is not the same as infactuation.  I was taught is something you decide to give to another person.  So, I am married 17 years to one person, the only person I ever dated.  I was also taught that love is like a canopy held by four poles staked into the ground.  Each person must bring the two poles of respect and trust over which love is draped.  Without these two love will not be able to stand over the two.  These principles shaped a lot of how I approached my choice in marriage and even my on-going approach to sustaining it.  It may seem less "romantic," but it has been what has worked for us.

I agree with what Rockeman wrote. And congratulations for your 17 years; may you enjoy many more together.

++Are you looking for "the one", for some ideal?

That sounds like a dangerous idea. It's not because of some special, magical quality that some "one" possesses. If that were so, then the "relationship" is doomed, because people change. And that belief does, indeed, doom a lot of marriages. One person says "You've changed. I've changed. It's time to move on". Then the ugly divorce and the kids are all messed up.

"Relationship" is a noun by the rules of grammar, but it's not something real. You can not put a "relationship" into a basket. Relate is a verb. It's something you need to do, and if the "relationship" isn't working out, that means you haven't been doing it. The primary components of the action of relating are talking (preferably amicably) and taking care of each other. I'm sure there are a lot of other actions you can do as well, to relate and relate well.

You need to appreciate your spouse for her highest potential of this very moment, rather than rueing what she is or isn't, or what she used to be, but isn't anymore. You need to be receptive to her value as it may be in this moment, accept that it might change, but remain receptive to the new values that she can grow into as she continues developing a a person.

And help her do the same for you.

Passion by the way is not a bad thing. Enjoy it while you can, and rekindle it on a regular basis. You won't find an ideal in a person, but you can find it in your own values and behaviors. Keep the honeymoon going forever. ;-{)

Similar to relate and relationship - quit looking for love and start loving already. Love is not a possession, your wife is not a possession, everyone are really free individuals. What makes the relating work is to actively love each other. Practice Dāna.

You're right, love is not a possession it is something you choose to give but the more you give the more you have.

At first it was the 'honeymoon'.  Once that is over each day you make the choice, the decision if you will that you love your spouse.  Somedays that is the only 'love' you feel.

Almost 43 years ago, my wife and I not only committed our lives to each other but we also committed to the marriage. For we knew in advance that we would fail one another in many ways over the years and that love is a choice not a feeling. Being committed to the marriage means that we knew that marriage is a sacred trust in which the two of us are bound together.The crux of it all is that selfishness can't hang around long if deepening the relationship is expected.

No, we didn't have a media wedding or a storybook wedding and life together where we all have lived happily ever after. I will insert my poem that I wrote long ago regarding long term relationships. Oh, by the way, my wife and I have a spiritual life together that makes it all work.

Davis

Now, the poem:

“Love's Long-Lasting Look for Today”

Slick covers say youthful looks

And sleek bodies are to be worshiped
In fleeting moments of
Sage less, ever-severing
Meeting of the sexes.
All are tempted to buy stock
In glossy, commercial fiction
Yielding no dividend,
No deposit, no return
Reality of dead ends.
Look around with eyes made
To see beyond what is seen
To find love springing up
From years of plowing, planting,
Harvesting the fruit from lives clinging to REALITY.
So many years are such a short time.
No time wasted on tomorrow
Or yesterday
When all you have is today—
Now-Time is time to lavish love.
Love’s beauty never fades,
For when it was first seen,
It was seen—Beautiful--
Ageless beauty,
Ever-present Loveliness.
“Friend and Companion,
Wealth untold is heaped
Upon this union when there is
None to lend or
To spend.”
Time is with these Dear Ones
For they have loved more
Today than Yesterday
And Todays always build
Better Tomorrows.

©2/27/1985

RSS

Latest Activity

Brad Williams replied to Josh Allen's discussion If you can tell me what religion you are then you are in a prison.
"It seems to have become a favorite pasttime on the forum to make fun of this Josh Allen person, about whom I know almost nothing.  I think on the internet though, we ought to just look at ideas and principles and not personalities.  The…"
20 minutes ago
Native Son replied to Pale Horse's discussion Voter Scrutiny-- What's the Hangup? in the group The Great Debate
"Umm, Joe, down here south of your border, the various state governments have been fighting tooth and nail over adopting common standards for Drivers Licenses and non-driver ID cards since 2002.  I don't even want to think about how much…"
44 minutes ago
Native Son replied to Pale Horse's discussion Voter Scrutiny-- What's the Hangup? in the group The Great Debate
"More likely goofing like someone who really thinks the NSA is scanning every email for keywords."
54 minutes ago
Native Son replied to Pale Horse's discussion Voter Scrutiny-- What's the Hangup? in the group The Great Debate
"I believe, that by law, Social Security numbers and cards technically aren't identification for anything but individual Social Security "accounts" and matching that financial information with tax returns.  That's not to say…"
57 minutes ago
Wayne replied to Jonas Wright's discussion Button up V-Fit / Athletic Fit / any suggestions for shorter/slimmer guy with a broader chest
"Try old navy slim fit shirts. I have a 42 inch chest and a 35 inch waist and they fit me perect. I wear a large but the medium would probably be a good fit your your build. I have the problem of large shirts fitting my shoulders and hanging like a…"
58 minutes ago
Brad Williams replied to Jedi Knight's discussion Getting to Know a Woman
"That's like 95% of guys.  It's completely natural.  Sometimes when one door closes, another opens pretty fast.  Carpe Diem."
1 hour ago
Brad Williams replied to Jedi Knight's discussion Getting to Know a Woman
"I've met lots of girls on the internet.  We use the internet to find apartments and homes, to apply for jobs or find employees, to find music, movies, and games, as well as to preview and buy books.  The internet allows you to buy and…"
1 hour ago
Chuck Knight replied to Gary J's discussion Beard trends through history in the group Men with Beards
"But facial hair in some fashion has always remained attractive and desirable for men until the 20th century. We can blame the Great War for that one. Gas masks do not seal over beards, and "manly men" soldiers suddenly became clean…"
2 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service