Hello Men,

     Need some advice. A friend of mine in the states (Liscensed but under 18 yrs. of age) let a friend of theirs (someone who only had a permit) drive their vehicle. However, That driver wrecked the vehicle. The owner of the vehicle switched seats with the driver, and took the blame for the accident, and was issued a wreckless driving ticket.

    Legally, what would happen if they admitted/came clean to the police that it wasn't really them that caused the accident, and the one that was really driving decided to take the blame?

**NEED RESPONSES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE**

Views: 127

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It depends on the state, but from what I understand, the one with the permit wouldn't be able to drive for a long while (Think of it as he was on probation and violated parole) and he would have to wait to be able to drive again. The owner might be hit with a violation of driving laws, but I don't think it would have impacted him much in comparison to a reckless driving ticket.

Thank you for the response. And Virginia.

Was there an insurance claim filed on a comprehensive coverage policy?  If so, they're probably guilty of insurance fraud.

If the uninsured, unlicensed driver remained accountable, the insurance company would undoubtedly deny any coverage since I am sure that the policy states that only licensed drivers will be covered.  Kids do stupid things though.  Despite their best efforts the truth will eventually come out and the fallout is always worse than if they had told the truth to begin with.

RSS

Latest Activity

Liam Strain replied to Sam K's discussion Materialism and Marxism in the group The Great Debate
"FWIW - usually things done under the role of Moderator - are pretty clear (and tend to be labeled as such). We can participate in discussions as members as well."
6 minutes ago
Pale Horse commented on beardsworthy's group Men Who Like Comic Books
"Wow, you're pretty good."
19 minutes ago
Sam K replied to Sam K's discussion Materialism and Marxism in the group The Great Debate
"But you can't name any. Or even make a reply which isn't empty sophistry (that run of the mill argument of authority fallacy up therefore example). So far all I've seen you reuse the same genre of fallacies even after being called on…"
25 minutes ago
Sam K replied to Sam K's discussion Materialism and Marxism in the group The Great Debate
"I've got to work on that - when I get a reply from Sir that isn't just a logical fallacy that'd be refreshing."
31 minutes ago
David F. replied to David F.'s discussion How to fast? One meal or two? in the group Catholic Men
"We decided to go with one meal.  Indian for lunch and a shake for dinner. It worked out well. "
36 minutes ago
David F. replied to David F.'s discussion How to fast? One meal or two? in the group Catholic Men
"I think you will find it is church teachings founded on the bible which is based on Jewish tradition."
39 minutes ago
Native Son replied to Sam K's discussion Materialism and Marxism in the group The Great Debate
"Marx wasn't writing about czarist Russia.  Marx was writing about pre-1870 Prussia and labor conditions in industrial Europe. I've seen contemporary commentary (years ago, can't recall the actual citations) that expressed…"
41 minutes ago
David F. replied to David F.'s discussion How to fast? One meal or two? in the group Catholic Men
"Ya the fish sandwich was my go to. Today it will be lox at a bagel shop."
41 minutes ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service