I'd like to think of myself as a gentleman and I often end up acting more like a male, but at the same time I'm very happy/comfortable being a female.

In your opinion, can a woman consider herself a gentleman? Can she follow the guidelines of what it is to be a gentleman?

What exactly do you think? Yay or nay for the lady-gentlemen, and why exactly?

Edit:

By 'gentleman' I'm referring to the behavior, as in being polite and your mannerisms and such. Not so much what's in your pants, even though gentlemen happens to be a male pronoun.

And typically women who call themselves ladies are usually preppy and girly, I wouldn't say I'm extremely masculine but I'm certainly not girly.

This isn't about whatever gender I identify as, more so the general idea of women behaving as gentlemen.

Views: 2906

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sorry, no.  "Gentleman" is a gendered term.  She can follow whatever guidelines she likes to be as "gentle" as she wants -- but she's still fails the "man" part of "gentleman".

 

I've heard the term "gentlewoman" or "gentlelady" before.  Kinda clumsy.  "Lady" is better.

 

JB

"Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken." -- Tyler Durden, Fight Club

 

JB

In this case, your donut/danish analogy works better if you flip it ...  "A danish with a hole is a donut."

 

JB

Brilliant response! I couldn't agree more.

I think you're on the wrong site, good luck with your search

Why is she on the wrong site?

Art of Man-liness should say it all.

My sexual orientation really doesn't have anything to do with manner I behave in.

Everything you DO is a choice, including how you behave or with whomever you choose to have sex.

Have you ever had your reading comprehension formally tested?

I generally take this kind of response to these questions as "Yes, I'm attracted to women, but still too insecure to act proud of it."

Also, totally inappropriate conjecture on someone's personal life. Leave your passive-aggressive remarks at the door.

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"@Liam The complainant used the word racial profiling. So what? As I said, a judge removed for bias and a mayor who stopped the process doesn't get to overturn the SCOTUS decision. @Clinton We're back to things that make you feel icky.…"
2 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"The attacks that Hillary levied against Trump were not brought up by Holt.  The '76 Law Suit, his not paying contractors, his desire to see the housing market crash, his support of Iraq.  All of these were levied by Clinton when she…"
13 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Does it bother you that you spend so much more time and energy campaigning against Trump than Clinton? What's your endgame here? I'm certainly not a Trump apologist. But, the reality is, if he doesn't win ... she will. Whether…"
18 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"The moderator brought up taxes, etc. Trump had to contrive the Bernie discussion. Not equal."
21 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"There is nothing wrong with racial profiling."
23 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"You said in a statement earlier that Trump did bring up Bernie.  Clinton opened the door wide open for him when she brought up the DNC hack.  Trump was given softball after softball and he swung and missed.  He would rather talk about…"
24 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"No, I am calling you out for accepting that NBC is grossly biased and expecting Trump to play on their terms. Why do you think it is natural for Trump to be interrogated while Hillary gets softballs? Why do you think it is Trump's job to go…"
27 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Have you looked at the numbers on "Stop and Frisk" in NY Shane.  it's something like close to 90% of people that were found with nothing.  And again.  These numbers were in the hundreds of thousands of people stopped.…"
29 minutes ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service