Positives

University girl.
You didn't ask for her number upon first meeting her, but she gave it to you when you asked for it the third time you saw her.
She has waken up at 5 am to exercise with you.
She has also waken up at 5 am to go feed the homeless with you.
You and her have had 2 lunch dates
She was willing to get in your car after barely a month of knowing you.
Responds to 98% of your texts/calls.
You haven't spent a dime on her yet.

Negatives

Failed the "door test" (Example)
Canceled a proper date to study for chemistry final (understandable lol)

Keeper or no keeper??

What are your thoughts??

Views: 773

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Who said the guy drove a new car?? He drives a 96 Pontiac.

Dated a girl once in college who put on cake when I came over, thats a keeper. haha

You've considering it a negative because she turned down a date to study for a final? If you are not in university or if are but take it less serious than her, I think it might you who might end up not being a keeper.

And I put in parenthesis that a final is understandable, so let's not go there...

In university, the whole year is a final sometimes. I mentioned this because I had a female housemate once in university who was dating a guy who never went before (he worked as a mechanic). She got on with him but it never worked. To him, he thought of school the way you do in high school and took it personal when she couldn't go out on a week night or sometimes had to stay in the library on a Friday night or weekend. She ended up dumping him because it became too stressful.

Also, sometimes even when both went to university but one is either less dedicated or finished there can be friction because the other still needs to spend a lot of that time in school. I met my wife in Medical School and to be honest I don't know how any of my classmates managed to have relationships with people not in the program. Their partners must have been forever waiting on them.

I'll assume this is not serious.  Surely nobody seriously wonders whether to give up on a girl because she didn't open the car door for him.

Probably that one with all the animal skins on it

She was willing to get in your car after only knowing you for a MONTH, dude? Only a MONTH? and she got in your CAR?

 On top of that, she did not unlock the door for you? 

 Seriously dude, lose her. Dump her immediately. She is a complete and total floozy. You should not have anything more to do with this girl ever again. 

 And as a rule, never ever date a Woman who is willing to get in your car that quickly. 

 Women these days. Such trollops. 

I hope you're not serious...I'm sure she took precautions or told someone where she was going.

Not too quick on the uptake.

He was making fun of you.  It shouldn't take a girl a month to feel safe getting into a car with you.

JB

Too easy.

I don't see why everyone is so negative here....

RSS

Latest Activity

Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion AG Sessions in the group The Great Debate
"And that's not even how he found out. He saw a news segment and thought it was a prank. I still lol about it."
6 minutes ago
Portnoy replied to Pale Horse's discussion AG Sessions in the group The Great Debate
"Personally, I think he is mentally imbalanced and this is it showing. Things aren't going that well for Trump in other ways, so he is going back to the well of anti-Hillary, seeing how it is working with the AM radio crowd. Throw that out there…"
14 minutes ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion AG Sessions in the group The Great Debate
"He fired Comey, who was 3000 miles away on official business/using official transportation, by sending his personal body guard (not Secret Service) over to Comey's office with a letter."
15 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion AG Sessions in the group The Great Debate
"Yeah, the only thing keeping me from going "Wow, what a numbnuts," is the fact that he's proven me wrong before. He's not as profligate as people make him out to be."
15 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion AG Sessions in the group The Great Debate
"As bad as this looks already? Would be easier if he cordially either did it to coincide with Scaramucci's joining, or timed it a good while after."
17 minutes ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion AG Sessions in the group The Great Debate
"Pieces are moving. "Time will tell"."
17 minutes ago
Vendetta replied to Pale Horse's discussion AG Sessions in the group The Great Debate
"Simply put, it would look bad.  That's why he hasn't fired him."
19 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion AG Sessions in the group The Great Debate
"Then what's the endgame here? I would think, like everyone else, that Sessions crossed him, but bringing up Clinton confuses me, because that's under the direction of Trump himself."
27 minutes ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service