Hi there! I am a 46 year old man from Norway who has been struck by the realization that there are more boys than men out there, even at my age! I was also struck by the realization that my own status in  that regard was not all that favourable. So I decided to change that.

What does "being a man" to mean me? 

First of all, it is a matter of responsibility. Boys indulge and blame. Men take responsibility and act. If your wife complains that you do too little around the house, ask yourself what your responsibilities are, and whether you follow them up. 

Second, it is a matter of a certain cleanliness of body and spirit. A man has rid himself of "childhood trauma" and can appreciate his parents, whatever shortcomings they might have had, and will always look up to his father. He carries this out into the world, looking more to work on the man within than to pick quarrels with those outside.

Third, a man values function and form. He is not dazzled by the lights like a boy, but asks what the function is, and whether it has a good form. A man thus dresses sensibly, and has his nice clothes, but does not hanker for jewels and glitter.

Fourth and last for now, a man is a self-starter, and knows when to speak and when not to.

Views: 66

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Welcome to AOM. You have clearly differentiated the men from the boys. Based on your definition, I'd say, now I know what is wrong with America.....

We don't have enough Norwegians?

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Brexit in the group The Great Debate
"Because GDP is not a proper metric for economic health when running a nation. It's the same situation there as it is here. The bankers are getting rich while middle class jobs are off shored, and what isn't offshored is being soaked up by…"
47 minutes ago
Nick H replied to Pale Horse's discussion Brexit in the group The Great Debate
"A few years ago The Economist did an article comparing the number of new business start ups and growth in the USA vs the EU countries and it was not good for Europe. It showed most new innovative companies (Apple, Google, Facebook, Tesla, etc) were…"
54 minutes ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion Brexit in the group The Great Debate
"I'll list a few arguments, without commenting on how they match up to counterarguments. Nick's point:  EU's not doing well. UK will now be free to drop trade barriers with nations outside the EU. EU will hurt itself by putting up…"
58 minutes ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion Brexit in the group The Great Debate
"Well, this was my big concern after the vote:  that the people would speak, and the government would ignore them. Good thing here is that the Lib Dems are generally way behind on voting day.  I just hope Labour and Conservative don't…"
1 hour ago
Nick H replied to Pale Horse's discussion Brexit in the group The Great Debate
"Maybe untying yourself from a sinking ship?"
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion Brexit in the group The Great Debate
"Chisosto is racist. Chisosto supported "Leave." Therefore "Leave" is racist. Aristotle would never approve."
1 hour ago
Milo Morris replied to Pale Horse's discussion Brexit in the group The Great Debate
"I don't have a full-blown economic analysis to offer. But I have seen and read a number of stories about small and mid-sized UK business having a hell of a time operating at desired profits under EU regulations."
1 hour ago
Steve Dallas replied to Pale Horse's discussion Brexit in the group The Great Debate
"Can someone explain to me how this benefits Britain in the long run economically? In an ever shrinking world where the market knows no borders I am just left shaking my head trying to find a good reason to do this other than short term…"
2 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service