Hi all,

I've run into a dilemma with styling my hair. I've basically defaulted, time and time again, to the "Bieber" hair style because of my fine hair.

I don't mean "fine" as a vain word to describe good hair, I'm talking more of "each piece of hair is thin" which therefore leads to my main concern: My hair does not contain volume very well. This makes it difficult for me to style it in some of the more fashionable "poofy" hair styles, without using hair spray or greasing it up.

I'm wondering what I might recommend my barber to try with my hair? Currently it looks the same as it is in my profile picture although it's an older photo (below for a bigger view):

Ideally, I'd like to get some extra volume in it. I've tried a volume-adding shampoo and it hasn't worked in the long run. My barber told me that "shampoos that add volume are only temporary... if you think about it, you only have them in your hair for a brief period of time, then you wash them out". It makes sense to me.

Are there any others out there that share my pain? What do you do about it?

PS. I would definitely like to go for a "Jason Bateman" hair style if possible, which can be seen on this page:

http://www.thehairstyler.com/celebrity-hairstyles/jason-bateman

I'm just not sure whether my fine hair will work well with these though. I use Pom-aid and everything but most of the time my hair just flops back down into my face sometime in the day.

Any advice is appreciated.

Views: 21097

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Can you not go and ask advice from a hair stylist or hairdresser? 

I would if I knew any :/ but for now, I'm hoping someone on here might be able to offer some advice...

There may be, if not just walk into a hairdressers and present them with your issue... I am sure they will be happy to give you advice 

Fine hair simply means that each hair is thin.  We need more information.

 

It looks, in your photo, like your hair is combed down and forward...and it has some decent volume already.  It's just too long and too heavy.  Counterintuitive as it may seem, longer hair tends to weigh itself down and appears thinner than if it is cut short and allowed to spike up for some volume.

 

I don't know that you could successfully pull off the Jason Bateman haircut, but as an interim choice I could see you with a taper, full on top, swept forward, with a part on the left side.  Classic businessman's taper.  And, for those times you want more volume, sweep the bangs up or back.

 

Do go in and talk to a barber.  Whatever you choose will have to be tailored for you, specifically, and a consultation will be a very good investment of time.  

No hair dresser. Barber yes.

I used to have my hair similar.  A year ago, I started going shorter on the top and sides, but just barely touching the ears.  I also did away with any part.  So, it is now towel dry easy and go.  I've found I like it much better that way, and my wife does as well.

Best of luck !  

RSS

Latest Activity

Chris J. left a comment for Matt J K
"Hey Matt! I hope you are doing well. Thanks for add, hope to chat sometime."
7 minutes ago
Elon Erani replied to Alan Robertson's discussion Personal Challenge Log -
"Alan Hi. How long ago did u start your routine of jogging & walking? U do it twice a week/ For 1/2 hr. I need to get into a routine. My depression is really zapping me of all my energy. I must lose weight & gain muscle. U r my guru. LOL.…"
13 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"It may currently be 'hard' but when welfare was enacted all the way up to Clinton it wasn't required as much.  And even now it's not all that hard.  Plan 1:  Stay on welfare for 3 years, enroll in a school, get…"
17 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"Why is welfare a "benefit" and not a handout? JB"
22 minutes ago
Jack Bauer replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"Even with all of that -- 26-weeks, lower maximum, better enforcement, etc. -- it's still a handout.  It's just a better controlled handout. Its a tax and a government check with the candy-coated term "insurance" to make…"
23 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to John Muir's discussion The End of Quantitative Easing As We Know It in the group The Great Debate
"True, so it is possible that Keynes did not even consider 'drains' to the money supply in such a manner."
23 minutes ago
John Muir replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"Yep"
25 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Will's discussion What's going on in those heads in the group The Great Debate
"Some of what you propose has been used in the past to no effect.  For example a television show in the 60s about a ghetto black family (Dynomite!!!) included a father.  Purportedly the show was intended to provide positive characters.…"
30 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service