Thanks for having me. I make clocks, incense burners, lamps, and whatever else comes to mind. I enjoy fixing broke stuff, and don't mind lending a hand to those in need. I look forward to discussions and learning genuinely useful things.

Views: 49

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Welcome, Daniel.  It's very nice to meet you!


A clockmaker!  One of my favorite topics.  I've studied and even attempted gear hobbing, and even clockmaking.  I just love clockwork mechanisms, but I always fail when making the escapement.  It seems to require more precision than I can muster.


Any hints for someone who has yet to bring one to life?

Angle and spacing on escapement teeth is critical. if they are off it will run away or not move. Which do they usually do?


It never moves.  I know this can be an issue of depth, or or angle, or of friction as well.


Say, you don't have a drawing for a grasshopper, do you?  I have the design PDF, but without a practical model it's all theory.

grasshopper is pretty complex. I have messed with deadbeat escapements. the teeth on the escapement are cut at two different angles, the deeper ones to hold the gear and the outer one is cut for " impulse" to keep the pendulum going.

I've tried basic deadbeat, and even recoil escapements.  Graham is a "simple" one.  But I never seem to end up with a successful escapement.


The grasshopper is of particular interest to me, because my interest lies in woodworks.  Very beautiful, but very high friction, which is not a weakness of the grasshopper.  Harrison was a genius.


Wouldn't mind a Grimthorpe gravity escapement, either...or a MacDowall single pin, but talk about something that's *deceptively* simple looking.  Wow,

I dont think the actual design is the problem, build one and adjust the tooth angle a tiny tiny bit at a time.

If it has a pendulum make sure it is heavy enough.



Latest Activity

Vendetta replied to John Muir's discussion When Is the time to talk about gun control? in the group The Great Debate
" ; Interesting article from the New York Times. Thought this would be appropriate for this thread."
11 minutes ago
James replied to Specs's discussion Movember 2015
"This almost made me shoot coffee out of my nose. Comment of the year, right here!"
1 hour ago
Jay D replied to David R.'s discussion In trouble? in the group The Great Debate
"1. No, no one would notice. In case someone would want to attack us for it; we could talk us out of it. 2.Not politically. Even though, it would be bad business practice. Why not offer services in spanish to our spanish speaking customers?"
1 hour ago
Sir replied to David R.'s discussion In trouble? in the group The Great Debate
"OK, we've discussed it.  Is there more to be said?  What else?"
1 hour ago
Vendetta replied to Mongoose's discussion Thoughts on the Baltimore Ravens Cheerleader who Raped a 15 Year Old?
"We get it, you don't like that statutory rape is called rape. Guess what... It is. By law statutory rape is a form of rape. Get over it."
2 hours ago
David R. replied to David R.'s discussion In trouble? in the group The Great Debate
"Sir, it's not "leading" anywhere.  Just some topics I thought might be interesting to discuss."
2 hours ago
Native Son replied to Pale Horse's discussion "Dear Fat People" in the group The Great Debate
"Legally, San Francisco tried to "dis-incentivize"the "Happy Meal" by banning the toys.  Net result, a lot of carping in the local papers and a tad higher profit for the franchisee(s)...who no longer had to buy the toys."
2 hours ago
Mongoose replied to David R.'s discussion In trouble? in the group The Great Debate
"1) No. However, though it is not wrong or illegal, it COULD be a symptom and could be used as evidence to support a sexual harassment case and/or gender discrimination. In and of itself, refusing to support breast cancer while supporting prostate is…"
2 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service