Let's keep it short and sweet.

My girlfriend lives with her grandparents. I was told he'd be mad if I spent more than a few bucks (as in like 20) and already bought a $100 bracelet. If he gets upset or something (he's weird, some things he likes when I don't listen to him, others he gets mad about) what would a proper, gentlemanly response be? I'm sixteen, by the way.

Views: 225

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"I chose a gift I thought your granddaughter would like and that I could afford, Sir."

However - Social taboos in play that the grandfather is reacting to, but can't articulate:

1. Expensive, ostentatious gifts

2. Jewelry as a first Christmas present, in a casual relationship

Both can (especially "in past generations") put the granddaughter in a tough position. They can imply you're trying to buy her. That the relationship is more serious than 16-year-olds should have. That your family is better than hers. That you're better than she is.

Consider, in my upper-middle-class family, full of adult professionals, very few gifts cost $100. I budget $100/person at Christmas, and only since I completed law school. My own family would be embarrassed - has been embarrassed - by gifts that expensive, even when there are no "How do they afford it?" issues. Expensive gifts from a teenager would have been rejected growing up.

People are just funny about presents. I often talk about how my in-laws give only cards at occasions (Father's Day, birthdays) when my family gives gifts and no cards. On AoM today was a story that could be interpreted as meaning a young person thought it was so important to give the boss a gift, she gave him stolen goods. My mother would be aghast to learn that I decided it wasn't worth the trouble to coach my new husband through giving me a gift. My husband is aghast at the inexpensive, unwanted gifts my mother puts so much effort into giving.

I know you don't mean any of those taboos I named. But they're part of our unwritten social fabric, or they were.

Stop using the word "like". 

 Make no mention, ever, to anyone about the dollar amount you spent on a gift. Ever. To anyone. 

If asked directly what you spent on a gift, respond with "What I could afford without going over my holiday budget". If pressed beyond that, respond with "I don't believe that is really' appropriate, to discuss the price of a gift". 

Your best response would depend on what he says.  But the best demeanor, I think, would be detachment from the attack, and focusing on other things.

And that may be wrong.  He may like a good fight.  A joke may turn it.  An excuse.  "

But I'll go with Rebekah:  if you're not, say, engaged, a $100 bracelet is a major statement that you aren't ready to make yet.  Women take jewelry gifts seriously (so women tell me).  Can you return it?  Or save it for a time when the commitment is strong enough to merit it?

RSS

Latest Activity

R. Max commented on Jack Bauer's status
7 hours ago
Jack Bauer posted a status
"Good grief; it was a kangaroo with a beach ball, not an insurrection. I was making fun of taking seriously such a toothless thread topic."
7 hours ago
Johnzerd1 replied to Braeden P.D.'s discussion Post-Mortem Symposium
"This reminds me of the old Steve Allen series  Meeting of minds .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6XPCgL8X28"
8 hours ago
Hesse posted a discussion

First date: success not optional but mandatory

I have a date tomorrow night with a girl I met online. While this may sound like great news and the answer to lifelong joy, I want to make sure that this leads to a second date, and that I don't make a "death move" to end all chances of seeing her again. This is the early cultivation phase of a relationship, the kind of relationship I have been praying for , that leads to romantic love, marriage and procreation.  All of my experience with the few dating I have has been unsuccessfulSo, at this…See More
9 hours ago
Sir replied to Henrik Stroemblad's discussion Lacking in the most basic of common cortesy
"I couldn't have.Thread locked."
10 hours ago
John Muir replied to Henrik Stroemblad's discussion Lacking in the most basic of common cortesy
"but you sure are getting your giggles out of it"
10 hours ago
R. Max replied to Braeden P.D.'s discussion Post-Mortem Symposium
"Well I did say Lemmy.  I kid, that would be the most fundamentally important thing, but just for the sake of amusement, maybe not. "
10 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to Henrik Stroemblad's discussion Lacking in the most basic of common cortesy
"Such a strange thread to have go sideways. JB"
10 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service