So I was pondering the subject of Justice in the AoM book, and one of the pieces of advice was to read and watch reputable news  sources. I know this can be a touchy subject about skewness, but what I usually try to do is to go on sites like CNN and Fox and read the headlines to get a broader picture of what is going on. I also prefer reading than watching. Is it better to get the Google mash up. For my local news I usually go to the Eagle Tribune which has the been the go to paper for years in my area.

Views: 795

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Do you mean getting the news?

My suggestion, especially if you prefer reading, is to read your local paper, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. Throw in a couple magazines, like the Atlantic and the Economist. Get some foreign views as well with the BBC or Al Jazeera English.

Would you say the New York times for the Left-Leaning source and the WSJ for the right?

That is correct.

Is there a particular section for the NYT and WSJ to key in on?

Their reporting overall is superior to other American newspapers.

So should I just head to the U.S section of the journal when I visit the site?

If you want to find out what's going on in the U.S., yes.

I love the Economist

Sometimes you have to look a little closer to the news. I remember a story that a Pastor of a church was put behind bars because he spoke against homosexuality, it made news all over as how our country is persecuting Christian beliefs. Look a little closer and you find out the "Pastor" was calling for the deaths of gays and this happened in Canada. He never served one day in jail and the only reason he got in trouble is because he broke the law of what Canadian laws call 'hate speech.'

 

Although Canada has laws against hate speech I doubt anyone spent time in prison because of it.

As Cisco stated - "He never served one day in jail"

The story morphed to the point of; "Christians are being put in jail because of their beliefs" on Christian websites, they really believed it. I used to think there was a tit for tat between the more extreme elements of both the gay and Christian communities, but I started to see most "Christians" are really going full throttle against anything smelling of gay equality and turning around with saying they're being "persecuted" for their beliefs when the gay community fights back.

Perfect example of blaming the victim.

RSS

Latest Activity

Michael Rowland replied to Benjamin Hodge's discussion Question about love languages for anyone that's done them...
"We both took that quiz as well! I got Physical Touch. My wife got Acts of Service. She really enjoys a clean house. So when I've got the time and want to do something, I find something that needs cleaning. I typically do more than my…"
12 minutes ago
Josh100LuBu posted a photo

Josh100LuBu - Heading Out

Quick photo before I head out.
25 minutes ago
Will replied to Rusty Rogers's discussion Politically-Biased History? in the group The Great Debate
"http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/05/12/weak-men-are-superweapons/ Also, big claims elicit big opposing claims.  As Orwell noted, specifics are less likely to deceive.  Good reason to avoid specifics?  I would hope not."
33 minutes ago
Michael Rowland replied to Gus Parker's discussion Honorifics
"I tend to use someone's full name when I first make contact with them. I will only use an honorific if it's something like Doctor, Professor, or Judge as that's an earned honorific and should be respected. Only when I'm…"
39 minutes ago
Vytautas replied to Rusty Rogers's discussion Politically-Biased History? in the group The Great Debate
"Yes, Fox is a prime example of the latter, Rusty."
40 minutes ago
Josh100LuBu replied to Stein's discussion Being called by your last name
"I like to be called Lord. I am officially a Lord so it's what most usually call me. "
43 minutes ago
Shane replied to Rusty Rogers's discussion Politically-Biased History? in the group The Great Debate
"Interesting. I'd wondered what became of those kids. I always assumed they'd had to choose their world."
53 minutes ago
Michael Rowland replied to Stein's discussion Being called by your last name
"I generally prefer going by my first name. I work in academia, and everyone uses their first name. The only time someone refers to someone else by their last name ("Dr. Smith" or "Professor Smith") during a normal day is when…"
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service