So I was pondering the subject of Justice in the AoM book, and one of the pieces of advice was to read and watch reputable news  sources. I know this can be a touchy subject about skewness, but what I usually try to do is to go on sites like CNN and Fox and read the headlines to get a broader picture of what is going on. I also prefer reading than watching. Is it better to get the Google mash up. For my local news I usually go to the Eagle Tribune which has the been the go to paper for years in my area.

Views: 798

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Do you mean getting the news?

My suggestion, especially if you prefer reading, is to read your local paper, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. Throw in a couple magazines, like the Atlantic and the Economist. Get some foreign views as well with the BBC or Al Jazeera English.

Would you say the New York times for the Left-Leaning source and the WSJ for the right?

That is correct.

Is there a particular section for the NYT and WSJ to key in on?

Their reporting overall is superior to other American newspapers.

So should I just head to the U.S section of the journal when I visit the site?

If you want to find out what's going on in the U.S., yes.

I love the Economist

Sometimes you have to look a little closer to the news. I remember a story that a Pastor of a church was put behind bars because he spoke against homosexuality, it made news all over as how our country is persecuting Christian beliefs. Look a little closer and you find out the "Pastor" was calling for the deaths of gays and this happened in Canada. He never served one day in jail and the only reason he got in trouble is because he broke the law of what Canadian laws call 'hate speech.'

 

Although Canada has laws against hate speech I doubt anyone spent time in prison because of it.

As Cisco stated - "He never served one day in jail"

The story morphed to the point of; "Christians are being put in jail because of their beliefs" on Christian websites, they really believed it. I used to think there was a tit for tat between the more extreme elements of both the gay and Christian communities, but I started to see most "Christians" are really going full throttle against anything smelling of gay equality and turning around with saying they're being "persecuted" for their beliefs when the gay community fights back.

Perfect example of blaming the victim.

RSS

Latest Activity

Daniel replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion The Real Reason Women Cheat
"I see what you're saying, but I wouldn't considered it "cheating" or "extramarital" for the single one, since a single person has no commitments to cheat against, hence the distinction between extramarital vs…"
45 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion The Real Reason Women Cheat
"Cashing in on men who fear their wives are stepping out? Or -- based on the "change in relationship paradigm" thing -- men who want to be the ones doing the stepping. "
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion The Real Reason Women Cheat
"Play with it a little.  First, imagine that in your universe, nobody ever cheats.  So that's 0 hetero extramarital/amarital sex acts for women, 0 for men. Uh-oh.  Somebody did one.  It's hetero, so there's 1 man…"
1 hour ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"It is obvious. Liberals just refuse to accept that water is wet."
1 hour ago
Daniel replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion The Real Reason Women Cheat
"Valid point. And I suppose it's still "extramarital" even if he's not married? Or perhaps it would be "amarital"... Anyway, the statistic does seem off, but I wouldn't know."
1 hour ago
Daniel replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"A fetus is definitely an organism that is alive, and is definitely human; I don't see how that's not obvious. I mean, cells are replicating, what more do you need? I think what's being argued here is when the soul (or something like…"
1 hour ago
Pale Horse replied to Joshua Hudson's discussion The Real Reason Women Cheat
"And here it is: http://pinnacleofman.com "
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service