I'm planning a camping trip for a group of men and I haven't really found a lot of variety when it comes to what we can eat. We will be out in the mountainous hills of Georgia for 3 days and 2 nights. I've looked at a few videos about cooking over a campfire and I've seen a few good ideas like wrapping up some fish or a potato with some other vegetable and seasonings in tin foil and putting that over the fire. Another one I saw that was pretty interesting is bannock, the guy who was making it in the video called it the omelet of the camp fire because you can put just about anything in it. Does anyone have any good bannock recipes? or any other good campfire recipes?

Views: 620

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Depending on your budget you cannot beat a steak cooked over real flames!

You could definitely go the hobo dinner route, dicing up your meat, taters & whatever vegetable, seasoning, adding lots of butter and wrapping in tin foil. Put the entire pack in the coals and let it roast for 20-30 minutes. Probably terrible for you but quite delicious.

Avoid anything too complicated; you're there to poke the fire with a stick and look at the stars. You can keep it simple and still impress the guys with your culinary skills. No self-respecting guy is going to complain about the variety of food offered in a 3-day 2-night trip.
Iron skillet, bacon bottom layer, beans middle layer, eggs top layer.
That sounds really good, and also incredibly bad for you!
(drooling)
You can try army field rations. Those are actually pretty good. You just boil the package in water and go.
MRE's are fantastic. They taste good, they're extremely filling, and very convenient. The only problem is that they have a lot of packaging, and you'll have a lot to carry out.
Third for MRE's. To solve the packaging problem just break them down before you head out and discard the stuff you know you will not need. Easy-peezy. I have used these many times. Good stuff!
I have to disagree with you on that. I have seen civilian ones, and the ones they call "Military MRE's" but they aren't really the ones we use. They seem to be alright. I don't know what kind of MRE's you actually get, but the ones the military get are horrible. The 8,000 Calorie a meal thing really isn't for leisure camping, it more for survival. And the meat they use is Grade D meat. I don't know, maybe its because I've been stuck eating them for extended periods of time, that I find them grotesque now. The first one I ever ate was in Boot Camp, and I remember thinking that it wasn't bad, but now I can't stand them
Chris, I get mine in a "black market" in Seoul. The vendors get them from the US bases. The 8k calories figure is, I'm pretty sure, an urban legend (unless they really do have some kind of insane emergency-ration type kits). Once, I counted up the calories, protein, etc. in a regular one (each package has all the nutrition figures on it), and it wasn't even 2k for the whole bag ("spiced apple cider" packet and all).

However, I'm SURE that if I had to eat a lot of MREs like you do, I'd end up tired of them pretty quick. As for an occasional camping/hiking thing for civilians like me, they're still okay (for now)!

As for meat, even if it were a slab of beer-fed Kobe beef, I wouldn't eat it if it were just sitting in a plastic bag for what might be years before consumption. I get the vegetarian ones (pasta usually...sometimes omelets), and they're fine. Of course, I have the luxury of choosing which ones I want in a marketplace setting. Field environments probably don't let you be so choosy :)
Way back in 93 they were 2500 cal but still tasted like shit thats why they put the hot sauce in every pack
Two words: Mountain House. http://www.mountainhouse.com/
I would agree. For pre-packaged ones, these are among the top.

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Shane's discussion Cup Holders
"Yeah.  I can only find almost what I'm looking for.  Found another style, but it's too shallow.  "
50 minutes ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
""Touching in an unbroken sequence" does not mean or imply a solid span. You interpolated that on your own. Especially since he's said since the beginning there were natural (or other) barriers which needed no wall, and some areas a…"
52 minutes ago
Liam Strain replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"Touching in an unbroken sequence.And really? You are going to hinge your defense of his inability to craft unambiguous EOs, and general abuse of clear communication and language use on "or other?"Why do you talk to me?"
1 hour ago
Pale Horse replied to Shane's discussion Cup Holders
"Well you're the one who can't operate google."
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Shane's discussion Cup Holders
"This shouldn't be a difficult thing."
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"I'm pretty sure you're the one who doesn't know what "contiguous" means. You're also ignoring the "or other" part. *shrug*"
1 hour ago
Pale Horse replied to Shane's discussion Cup Holders
"I still think you should go to some kind of furniture store and ask around. In this case you'll get better results than from googling."
1 hour ago
Liam Strain replied to Pale Horse's discussion Another Brick in the Wall in the group The Great Debate
"If he's defining words differently than what they mean, then it's a different problem, but it's not mine. "
2 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service